one-shot :
I'm wondering what systems(CPU/Chipset) people upgraded from before their current Core i7 Rig.
I'm currently looking to build a new PC for college this fall and would like some insight from others. Thanks.
Heh, "what did you run before your Core i7 rig." I currently run a state-of-the-2005-art socket 939 Athlon 64 X2 4200+ with 4 GB DDR-400 as my main machine. I know it is many generations behind what most people have here, but it gets along well enough for me and I will run it for another year or so until I finally get out of school and can buy a new one. My Dell Latitude notebook is a lot newer as it is only about a half a year old, but it is a low-end unit with a 65 nm Core 2 Duo T7250 and 3 GB of DDR2 running at 667 MHz. I didn't need much more than a basic notebook as this is solely a machine to take to lectures and take tests with. It works perfectly for that purpose and I can't argue with the price (about $650 tax paid and shipped!) nor the build quality. It is a heck of a lot better build quality than the 2002-vintage Gateway P4-M unit it replaced, plus it was about two grand less. That's progress for you!
Many people here had the following list of upgrades during that time period:
- 65 nm Core 2 Duo- usually the E6300 or E6600.
- 65 nm Core 2 Quad Q6600
- 45 nm Core 2 Quad Q9xxx series or Core 2 Duo E8400-8600
- 45 nm Phenom II or Core i7
I also run two systems rescued from the dumpster, an Athlon XP 3200+ with 1 GB DDR-400 and a Pentium III Coppermine 1.0B with 256 MB PC100 SDRAM. The Athlon XP is my HTPC and the PIII is my file/print server. Those machines work well for their intended purposes and I am more than happy to take machines that are still perfectly usable but you guys think are too slow. I do intend to do a pretty fair upgrade in a year or two and have a dual Socket G34 Opteron setup with two 12 or 16-core processors (or whatever Intel has at the time, if it is better- their roadmaps don't go out that far yet) in my sights to replace my desktop.