1) I will be running 4870x2 @ 1920x1200 res. on a 24'' monitor. Will there be a noticible difference in game performance with these two cards?
2) The 720 is only triple core but AM3 socket. 940 is quad core but only AM2+ socket. Since the mobo I'll be getting supports both AM2+ and AM3, I could theoretically upgrade the CPU in the future to another AM3 socket CPU. The 720 allows for DDR3 memory, while the 940 only allows for DDR2. (I think all that was right).
Mmmm it really depends, in technology the term "future proof" is very relative,the 940 is a more powerful processor,it's a quad core with 3.0 ghz clock speed and very over clocker friendly,the 720 is a tri core clocked at 2.8 ghz and also very friendly with overclocking (you should reach at least 3.4/3.3 ghz easily without adjusting voltage or cooling solutions),the only difference is that the 940 runs on the older am2+ platform while the 720 is designed for the newer am 3 platform. As far as performance goes the 940 smokes the 720 anyday however the abilty to go with the am 3 platform gives the 720 an edge since in the future when prices drop you could easily switch to a more powerful am 3 processor whereas the 940 would force you to change mobo and ram for future upgrades. As far as gaming goes both processors are good,the 720 is an awesome chip for those that dont want to spend money, the three cores multi task btter than any dual core,and its unlocked multiplier make it easy to increase the overall performance of the cpu so you wont have to worry about the cpu been the bottle neck in your case i would go with the 720 and buy an am3 board that way in the future (meaning next year lol) you won't be held back by the platform you chose and all you would have to upgrade is the cpu.
The question we wanted to answer in this article, “Is the Phenom II X3 720BE an alternative to the Phenom II X4 940 for a mid-range gaming system featuring CrossFireX?” We have to enthusiastically answer with “Yes!” to that question based on our experiences with the games we tested today and several others offline.
In fact, we think it even compared well to the Q9550 in our gaming tests. The Phenom II X3 720BE does not match the performance of the X4 940 or Q9550 in application testing, but it is no slouch either, especially considering the $136 price tag and overclocking capabilities. Compared directly to the $215 X4 940, we think the X3 720BE is a better value if gaming is your priority. Sure, any performance differences might be greater with a GTX 295 or 4870X2 at 2560x1600 resolutions, but we are discussing the performance capabilities of mainstream processors and video cards at two of the most popular gaming resolutions today.
When it came to actual game play experiences, our opinions still have not changed when it comes to a choice between the Phenom II or Core 2 Quad. The Phenom II processors are a better choice in Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts and Crysis Warhead due to fluidity of game play, especially with background tasks running or CPU utilization near 100%. In the four other titles, we could not tell any real differences in the quality of game play between the Phenom II X4 940, Phenom II X3 720BE, or Core 2 Quad Q9550.
There are single-card HD 4870 benchies in the article.
The performance of the PHII 720BE seems based upon the higher stock speed IMC/NB, and the gains from OC'ing it.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.