Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > From 8800gts 320 to Geforce 9800GTX+
Word :    Username :           
 

Hi all,
Will it be worth while to upgrade from nvidia geforce 8800GTS 320 to Geforce 9800GTX+ for 55$.

Thanks


Message edited by hangman2004 on 03-13-2009 at 12:02:59 AM
------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650, Intel DP45SG MB, 6GB Dual Channel DDR3 1333 MHZ(Kingston),
EVGA Geforce GTS 250, WD VelociRaptor 300GB, Creative X-Fi Xtremgamer, BFG Ageia PhysX 128MB
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Yes

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2578392638_2827857d10_o.png
Reply to B-Unit

Maybe. They both are the same G92 chip - in essence, the 9800GTX/GTX+ is a slightly improved version of the 8800GTS.

You will see improvement, but it won't be significant. How much are 8800GTS nowadays? If they are under 100, you should get another and SLi them.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Bluescreendeath on 03-13-2009 at 12:32:15 AM
Reply to Bluescreendeath

Were the 320mb versions of GTS G92? I thought it was only the 512 versions.

Reply to robert4561

^ I think there were 320, 512, and 640 mb versions...not 100% sure

Reply to Bluescreendeath
- 2 +

G80=320/640 G92=512 which was superior to the older ones. 9800GTX+ is a big step up from 8800GTS320

Reply to rolli59

I wouldnt say a BIG step up, I dont think its worth the money.

Reply to anarchy4sale

Yeah I think there were 320, 512 and 640mb versions but the 512 is based on the G92 and the others are not. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Is the GTS 320 worse then the 8800GT? I think it is.

 

EDIT: ah, too late :P


Message edited by Dark Comet on 03-13-2009 at 01:03:31 AM
Reply to Dark Comet

Bluescreendeath wrote :

Maybe. They both are the same G92 chip - in essence, the 9800GTX/GTX+ is a slightly improved version of the 8800GTS.



Nope, the 320MB and 640MB 8800GTS used a crippled G80 core, the 512MB 8800GTS that was released later was based on G92.


Reply to turboflame

Wouldnt it pretty much be like going from the 320 to the Ultra?

Reply to anarchy4sale

People dont like those charts so i have heard, unreliable :(

Reply to anarchy4sale
- 0 +

I used to have a 8800GTS, then I like an idiot I spilt water all over the top vent on my case, and blew the 8800GTS (320) up. I then got a 9800GTX+ (512). I didnt expect to see much difference, but I really noticed a performance difference (mostly in crysis). Plus it runs cooler and overclocks better. You cant go wrong for what your paying.

Reply to Lee-m
- 0 +

8800GTS320 had a weakness with eye candy turned on because of how little memory was installed.

Reply to rolli59

If the OP plays at a fairly high resolution then should there not be a big difference as rolli59 has said there is not enough VRAM on that card?

Reply to Dark Comet
- 3 +

OMG, so much fail in this thread.

He has the old school, low end G80 8800GTS. The 9800GTX+ is as good as (untill you hit high res with lots of AA) the 8800Ultra. I can see the lack of enthusiasim if he was paying retail (~$150) but for $55, its a great move.

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2578392638_2827857d10_o.png
Reply to B-Unit

thanks for all the replies guys. keep the ideas coming here one more question

instead of going for 9800GTX+ why not i go for Geforce GTS 250. 512MB or 1GB???

Reply to hangman2004
- 0 +

hangman2004 wrote :

thanks for all the replies guys. keep the ideas coming here one more question

instead of going for 9800GTX+ why not i go for Geforce GTS 250. 512MB or 1GB???


The GTS 250 is just another rebranded G92 based video card. If the GTS 250 cost $20 more than the 9800GTX+ upgrade, I'd say it isn't worth it.

Reply to g3force

g3force wrote :

The GTS 250 is just another rebranded G92 based video card. If the GTS 250 cost $20 more than the 9800GTX+ upgrade, I'd say it isn't worth it.



it's cheaper then 9800gtx+

Reply to hangman2004

For only $55 it most certainly is worth it. I'm guessing you're going through evga's step up program or something. Anyway the 320 version is limited by memory so even a 9800GT 512MB would be a significant improvment with many modern games. Not only that but the G92/G92b chip is a little more efficient than the G80 your current card is based on so that coupled with the increased speeds and SPs means that you'll see a pretty big difference.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00

should i go with 512 MB or 1GB Geforce GTS 250. i plan to upgrade to 1920 x 1200 monitor soon. but i think GTS 250 will max out before it can use 1gb memory.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650, Intel DP45SG MB, 6GB Dual Channel DDR3 1333 MHZ(Kingston),
EVGA Geforce GTS 250, WD VelociRaptor 300GB, Creative X-Fi Xtremgamer, BFG Ageia PhysX 128MB
Reply to hangman2004

I guess i didnt see he was only paying 55 bucks... sure why not. Full price though, no.

Reply to anarchy4sale

Thanks to everyone for there input.

I sold my 8800GTS 320 for 80$ and ordered Geforce GTS 250 for 133$. Final Price 53 Dollars.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650, Intel DP45SG MB, 6GB Dual Channel DDR3 1333 MHZ(Kingston),
EVGA Geforce GTS 250, WD VelociRaptor 300GB, Creative X-Fi Xtremgamer, BFG Ageia PhysX 128MB
Reply to hangman2004
- 0 +

Good deal, poor sucker could have had hd4830 for less

Reply to rolli59

For 55 bucks i would go for it. Not for full price it's a good upgrade mainly for the more onboard memory of the 9800 and a little bit for the G92. I traded my old 8800gts 320 for a GTX260 awhile ago when the 216's hit the market

Reply to IzzyCraft

IzzyCraft wrote :

For 55 bucks i would go for it. Not for full price it's a good upgrade mainly for the more onboard memory of the 9800 and a little bit for the G92. I traded my old 8800gts 320 for a GTX260 awhile ago when the 216's hit the market



Yeah i just wanted an upgrade becuase of memory, didn't want to waste money by buying 260 or 280 now becuase by end of this year GTX 300 Series be out which will be Directx 11. I can pass 6 to 8 months with GTS 250. Thanks Man.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650, Intel DP45SG MB, 6GB Dual Channel DDR3 1333 MHZ(Kingston),
EVGA Geforce GTS 250, WD VelociRaptor 300GB, Creative X-Fi Xtremgamer, BFG Ageia PhysX 128MB
Reply to hangman2004

rolli59 wrote :

Good deal, poor sucker could have had hd4830 for less



i'm good with GTS 250 dude. it serves my need perfectly for now. I can buy GTX 285 or 260 but i see it as waste of money as directx 11 cards (GTX 300 Series) will be out in about 6 months. You go ahead and ENJOY your Ati 4830 man...

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650, Intel DP45SG MB, 6GB Dual Channel DDR3 1333 MHZ(Kingston),
EVGA Geforce GTS 250, WD VelociRaptor 300GB, Creative X-Fi Xtremgamer, BFG Ageia PhysX 128MB
Reply to hangman2004
- 0 +

"Sucker" meaning the person that bought a used 8800GTS320 for 80USD when you can pickup a new HD4830 for 75 with full warranty.

Reply to rolli59
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > From 8800gts 320 to Geforce 9800GTX+
Go to:

There are 1256 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them