I am trying to make the following setup, but i have no idea what size power source to use. Is there either a site that will calculate it for me, or some advice from the members here? I tried simply adding things up, but i couldn't find the power usage for most of the parts.
Please note that the results are recommendations for wattage. They're usually overestimated because there are a lot of low budget, low quality psu's of questionable performance.
A high quality, high performance power supply in the 500 to 550 watt range can easily handle an overclocked quad core system and any single video card made. It could even power some of the mutiple card configurations.
There are over 400 technical reviews of power supplies over at www.jonnyguru.com
Hmm...it recommended 845 W...but that's 100% load and with an extra 30% built in....
Seems like considering i'm already spending about 1500 on this system for everything ELSE, another 40 bucks for the upgrade from 650w(what i had planned) to 850w isn't a big deal...
I'll bet for system type you selected quad sockets. Your motherboard only has a single socket for a cpu. Your motherboard does not have four sockets for four cpu's.
I know, i didn't select quad sockets, i selected single, but i figured out where i messed up, i accidentally changed the video type(from single card to SLI).
I may get a larger power supply anyway because it will leave me room to add another graphics card and such later on.
I'm not using an i7 because i can't find one as cheap...the i7 extreme costs more than twice my current CPU, and a normal core i7 2.93 GHz is still higher cost than what i'm currently planning, but for slightly lower clock speed and lower cache.
I may get a larger power supply anyway because it will leave me room to add another graphics card and such later on.
4 GPUs scale very poorly.
Quote :
I'm not using an i7 because i can't find one as cheap...the i7 extreme costs more than twice my current CPU, and a normal core i7 2.93 GHz is still higher cost than what i'm currently planning, but for slightly lower clock speed and lower cache.
Core i7 920 is cheaper than Q9650. The lower cache doesn't matter, and it should easily clock to well over 3GHz.
What makes the i7 series so much better that you would recommend a 2.66GHz over a 3.0GHz that's only slightly more(the one's i've found have about a 30-40 dollar difference...so about 10%)?
I'm pretty new to choosing parts, so i don't really know what the differences are.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.