I dunno.... we don't really have anything else that does it. Not like when we saw the difference between Core 2's FSB and K8/10's IMC. It should decrease latency on GPUs, but I dont know if it'll really offer any tangible benefits.
I think it'll just be a step closer to northbridge & southbridge becoming part of the CPU.
I would imagine its something that will be more useful as the other system bus's get more saturated, but for now, its not an issue. Its basically a preventive step, to avoid issues later on.
i7 would be the faster processer for gaming, hands down.
i5 will be dual channel memory and no hyperthreading, so the i7 is faster.
No i5 will have SMT as well. Well at least the ones coming out first. The Lynnfeild ones might not have SMT but the ones that we will see first will have SMT. I have heard some will have 4 threads per core.
And the i5 might have an advatage if the integrated PCI-E controller proves to be anything really special but until we have one there is no way of telling.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/1228 [...] index.html i saw here that the gigabyte P55 motherboard would come with a whopping 24 phase power possibly meaning that it will overclock the i5 like its on crack. And we do not know what extra features will be in the p57 mobo. . .
Therefore im also very confused about the i7/i5
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.