Should I build a Q6600 system or use Older (and free) Dual Xeon system

rs2k

Distinguished
May 20, 2008
137
0
18,680
My websites are currently hosted on a dedicated hosted server. I have plans on moving my websites to a server located in my home office.

Our dedicated server rarely uses more than 10% of its processor power and about 40% of its RAM. It is a quad core Q6600 with 2GB of ram.

I have two older IBM Dual 2.8GHz Xeon servers available to use. One with 4GB of RAM and one with 2GB of RAM. I believe they are netburst architecture CPUs.


Which system would be faster? How much faster would that system be?

I assume that even though they are dual processor the Xeon machines are probably slower. The Xeon machines were dirt cheap and I can get more if need be. That is why I am leaning towards using those machines instead of building a server that is similar to our current dedicated hosted server.


Any thoughts would be a great help.
 

rs2k

Distinguished
May 20, 2008
137
0
18,680
The server will only run PHP and MySQL based websites that run on apache and centos. Nothing else.

It's not a good comparison at all, but XAMPP and windows XP on this dual Xeon machine ran the MySQL queries (and the websites) faster than my last dedicated server which had a dual core P4 and 4 GB of RAM.
 

Dahak

Distinguished
Mar 26, 2006
1,267
0
19,290
In some instances the dual zeons are faster,Being they are installed on a MB that was designed to use 2 processors.The Q6600 is,however,a great cpu for the money.In a test I would say the systems would perform on a similar level on average.

Dahak

ASUS P5N-D
C2D E8500 STOCK
ZALMAN 9500 CPU COOLER
2X2GIG DDR2 1066 IN DC MODE
TOUGHPOWER 850WATT PSU
EVGA GTX 260
SMILIDON RAIDMAX GAMING CASE
LG 24IN WS LCD 1920X1080
250GIG HD/500GIG HD
LOGITECH G15 GAMING KEYBOARD
G5 GAMING MOUSE
LOGITECH Z-5500 5.1 SURROUND SYSTEM
500WATS CONTINUOUS,1000 PEAK
WIN XP PRO
 

rs2k

Distinguished
May 20, 2008
137
0
18,680
Thanks for the info. I can get 5 of these dual Xeon servers for the cost of one decent Q6600 server build. I think I'll stick with the dual Xeon servers for now.
 

rs2k

Distinguished
May 20, 2008
137
0
18,680
After getting CentOS installed onto the server I ran htop and noticed a difference. When the CPUs are under a load in the Q6600 system they all go up at the sam rate (i.e. they all go to 25%). With the dual Xeon system the CPUs are always at different rates. Is this what the motherboard does?