yes but look at the yields, I mean yes we still use it in benchmarks 2 yrs later, but look at cod4...still used...fear 1, even quake 4 and 3 are used.
they wanted to revolutionize the graphics and push pppl into upgrading, but during a recession and soon 2 be on, its not flowing. So whats next, keep it simple, pay 60$ for a game and have it on console.
They clearly said that they are doing console only because of piracy. I frankly am pissed off at them, because when Crysis came out, they pushed every1 to grab high end systems, then later released patch 1.1 which allowed me to play the game on High level with 1 8800 GTS 320. Before 1.1 ppl with 3 8800 Ultras couldn't even do med and high properly, now with 1.1 and 1.2, my laptop video card can even do High which is about the strength of 1 9600 GT lol.
So to answer your question, no they aren't. Making a game exclusive for a console or pc system just restricts them from attractin a much wider audience, I mean how much really of this planet are hardcore gamers, and how much can afford or want to afford a computer that cane play it with no headaches?
Look at GTA 4, Multi Platform, 3-4 million on 360, and 3-4 million ps3 (just an idea), now take away 1 console
, same goes for PC only
haha
We'll prob be seeing more of this, release it to platform, then bring it to PC if sales are high enough, like they did with GTA 4, Mirrors edge, and etc.