[I wasn't entirely sure which category to put this in, apologies if it should be elsewhere]
Hello,
I recently acquired a second hand computer, and am currently trying to install an operating system on it. Memtest86+ says that the RAM is ok, and various programs have told me that the HDD is also fine (one of Ubuntu's programs suggested that there was one bad sector, but that was well under tolerance).
Now, my problem is that. Installing Windows XP seems to be fine, until it restarts to run it and gives me the well known "Trap 00000006 Error - Exception" message. I've run chkdsk and that worked fine, and I've tried the Recovery Console to modify the ntldr file, but it didn't help.
I tried installing Ubuntu 9.10 as well - that also seems to install ok, but upon running it, it gives me a GRUB error and won't run. I can still run Ubuntu directly off the disk, but if I take the disk out and try and run it off the hard drive, it won't run.
Now, logically I would blame the hard drive for these issues (even with the passed tests), but somebody else has suggested the optical drive might be suspect and causing the corrupted installations. I'll try and replace each of them in turn and see if it helps. The question I have is: which should I replace first, the optical drive or the hard drive?
Any help is appreciated.
Hello,
I recently acquired a second hand computer, and am currently trying to install an operating system on it. Memtest86+ says that the RAM is ok, and various programs have told me that the HDD is also fine (one of Ubuntu's programs suggested that there was one bad sector, but that was well under tolerance).
Now, my problem is that. Installing Windows XP seems to be fine, until it restarts to run it and gives me the well known "Trap 00000006 Error - Exception" message. I've run chkdsk and that worked fine, and I've tried the Recovery Console to modify the ntldr file, but it didn't help.
I tried installing Ubuntu 9.10 as well - that also seems to install ok, but upon running it, it gives me a GRUB error and won't run. I can still run Ubuntu directly off the disk, but if I take the disk out and try and run it off the hard drive, it won't run.
Now, logically I would blame the hard drive for these issues (even with the passed tests), but somebody else has suggested the optical drive might be suspect and causing the corrupted installations. I'll try and replace each of them in turn and see if it helps. The question I have is: which should I replace first, the optical drive or the hard drive?
Any help is appreciated.