My eVGA 8800GT died 2 days ago, and while eVGA has accepted my RMA for replacement, I'm considering simply replacing it altogether with an HD4870 1GB and just selling whatever replacement card they send back. Though, I may keep the replacement for a 2nd system as my kid brother has been bugging me to build him a PC. Anyway, let me get to the main reason(s) I'm considering just replacing it.
My system components (minus the 8800GT):
WinXP SP3
MSI K9A2-CF AM2+ 790X Motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ BE @ 3.2GHz (16x200 - Stable and Cool)
OCZ Reaper HPC (2 x 2GB) DDR2-800 (XP only "sees" 3.25GB, but it's better than the 2GB crap Crucial Ballistix it replaced)
2X Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB SATA-II HDD (RAID-0)
Hanns-G HG216D 22" 1680x1050 Monitor
Now, since I've got an AMD/ATI 790X CrossFire-capable board and AMD/ATI's 4870 has dropped so much in price, I'm wondering if going to an all AMD/ATI setup is worth it. (The 3870 just didn't impress me in comparison to the 8800GT 14 months ago, nor does it now.) Dropping ~$200 for a 1GB 4870 isn't the concern, but the performance difference is. More specifically, the performance gain, if any, that I'll see is what's important to me. I know I'll gain the ability to CrossFire an AMD/ATI card in the future, but I see little need for that presently. I'd prefer to stay with a single-card setup and avoid what can become a CrossFire (and for that matter, SLI) nightmare.
Of course I've heard tons of complaints about ATI's drivers over the last year or so, so I'm a little wary in that regard, but the new Cat 9.3 seems to have sorted a great deal of those issues out. Maybe a list of games I play would help...
Crysis Warhead, Fallout 3, COD4, Warhammer Online, GRID, numerous NFS titles, Farcry 2, Savage 2, assorted HL2 titles/mods, and a few others. Honestly, my 8800GT handled just about anything I threw at it very well, only slowing down at all during very intense multi-player action in a few of those titles when 4xAA or 8xAA and 8xAF or 16xAF were enabled. For the most part, it ran single-player games at Max or near-max settings for just about everything.
One last thing to consider is I'll very likely start using a 32" 1080P HDTV (1920x1080) as a secondary (perhaps primary) monitor. With the slightly increased resolution, I'm betting I'd have to tone down my game settings on a replacement 8800/9800GT.
Of course, as a final option, I haven't ruled out a single GTX260 Core 216, either.
Thanks for your time!
My system components (minus the 8800GT):
WinXP SP3
MSI K9A2-CF AM2+ 790X Motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ BE @ 3.2GHz (16x200 - Stable and Cool)
OCZ Reaper HPC (2 x 2GB) DDR2-800 (XP only "sees" 3.25GB, but it's better than the 2GB crap Crucial Ballistix it replaced)
2X Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB SATA-II HDD (RAID-0)
Hanns-G HG216D 22" 1680x1050 Monitor
Now, since I've got an AMD/ATI 790X CrossFire-capable board and AMD/ATI's 4870 has dropped so much in price, I'm wondering if going to an all AMD/ATI setup is worth it. (The 3870 just didn't impress me in comparison to the 8800GT 14 months ago, nor does it now.) Dropping ~$200 for a 1GB 4870 isn't the concern, but the performance difference is. More specifically, the performance gain, if any, that I'll see is what's important to me. I know I'll gain the ability to CrossFire an AMD/ATI card in the future, but I see little need for that presently. I'd prefer to stay with a single-card setup and avoid what can become a CrossFire (and for that matter, SLI) nightmare.
Of course I've heard tons of complaints about ATI's drivers over the last year or so, so I'm a little wary in that regard, but the new Cat 9.3 seems to have sorted a great deal of those issues out. Maybe a list of games I play would help...
Crysis Warhead, Fallout 3, COD4, Warhammer Online, GRID, numerous NFS titles, Farcry 2, Savage 2, assorted HL2 titles/mods, and a few others. Honestly, my 8800GT handled just about anything I threw at it very well, only slowing down at all during very intense multi-player action in a few of those titles when 4xAA or 8xAA and 8xAF or 16xAF were enabled. For the most part, it ran single-player games at Max or near-max settings for just about everything.
One last thing to consider is I'll very likely start using a 32" 1080P HDTV (1920x1080) as a secondary (perhaps primary) monitor. With the slightly increased resolution, I'm betting I'd have to tone down my game settings on a replacement 8800/9800GT.
Of course, as a final option, I haven't ruled out a single GTX260 Core 216, either.
Thanks for your time!