Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Can only keep E8400 above 4ghz if I go past 1.4v

Can only keep E8400 above 4ghz if I go past 1.4v

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Can only keep E8400 above 4ghz if I go past 1.4v

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey people,

Just like the title says, I have my E8400 @ 4ghz right now (FSB 445x9) @ 1.36v (1.33 CPU-Z).

However, to go anywhere past 4ghz, the CPU requires a significant bump in voltage... for example, I have it now @ 4.1 ghz @ 1.4v (1.384v in CPU-Z)...

My question is... how suicidal is this? Am I risking the life of my CPU? Would you guys accept 1.4v as a 24/7 voltage?

Temps are nice, i guess. On a Zalman CNPS9500, idle temps are around 38ºC and load temps are around 58-60ºC.

What do you guys think? Am I risking too much? Is 100 extra mhz worth this increase in Vcore?

I know most people will probably say no... but it's kind of a psychological mark you know, to actually have it above 4ghz... :ange:

Cheers!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

1.4V will work, but I wouldn't bother for that small of an increase in speed. 100MHz is probably unnoticeable as far as any normal operation is concerned.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

What are your temps at 1.36? If there is significant temp increase at 1.4 i'd say it is not worth the 0.04 incease for just 100mhz - which wont matter in any real application anw-
I wouldnt say you are risking the life of your chip but when higher ambient temps occur you might have much higher temps and throttlebacks.
At 1.4v you are usually more prone to damage from power flactuations aswell.

Reply to slo

If it makes you feel any better, you are going a little bit over 4 ghz.

For me 4 ghz is the milestone. However, if you want 4+, for whatever reason, then use 1.4. It's a little high, but you are not going to fry your chip. So, screw whether it is worth it or not in a strictly performance sense. If it makes you happy, then just do it. (And make sure you have good case ventilation as well.)

Reply to gimpy1

i'd have to say that anything past 3.6 is not too much of a benefit anyway.

I tested many different games/apps @ stock/3.6/4.0 on my E8400 and the jump from 3.0 to 3.6 is quite substantial in comparison to the little gain i got from 3.6 to 4.0.

In fact, some apps/games ran worse @ 4.0 than 3.6.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jonpaul37 on 06-05-2009 at 03:17:34 PM
------------------------------ ASUS PQ5 PRO - E4500 @ 3.3 - 4GB GSkill DDR2 800 @ 4-4-4-10 - Sapphire 4850 512MB @ 655/1015 - Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB 7200 RPM 32MB - Win 7 64-bit - PC Power & Cooling S61EPS 610W Power Supply
Reply to jonpaul37

its all theoretical as far as bumping up voltages and the life of the cpu. i really doubt it will do anything - i had my e8500 at 1.5 volts for a week solid just to test it and nothing happened.

------------------------------ E8500 oc'd 3.8 @ 1.25 vcore with 92mm Zalman
ATI 4850 oc'd 680/1158 with aftermarket Zalman
Asus P5Q Pro mobo
2 gigs 800 Corsair ram @ 4-4-4-12
Reply to werxen

jonpaul37 wrote :

i'd have to say that anything past 3.6 is not too much of a benefit anyway.

I tested many different games/apps @ stock/3.6/4.0 on my E8400 and the jump from 3.0 to 3.6 is quite substantial in comparison to the little gain i got from 3.6 to 4.0.

In fact, some apps/games ran worse @ 4.0 than 3.6.


I agree, 4ghz is only good for bungholio runs and little else.

Reply to mousemonkey

The 45nm C2D chips seem to have a sweet spot at 3.6Ghz around 1.29/1.31 v (Chip dependant) when it comes to performance against power use and heat production, but then this is always the case with overclocking your Cpu, the higher end of overclocks always create much more heat and use more power than the speed you get from it in return, To be fair though, I personally think 3.8Ghz is the best balance if you want the speed but want to stay within the 1.36v limit set by intel, I am happy with that and also know that it will run stable even on the hottest summer day! (Although I will probably be outside enjoying that day instead of sitting in front of my PC)

Loads of peeps run 1.4/1.45v on 45nm C2d Chips and not many fail, so it should be a safe enough practice, but cooling is essential at that speed and really, why? Ive long learnt that it matters not the speed of your processor, but the way you use it!

------------------------------ CM Scout Case|Asus P5Q|Intel 7200 @ 3.8ghz|Artic Freezer 7|4Gb Tracer 1066mhz 5,5,5,12|HD 4870 @ 850/4400mhz|750w Corsair TX|1Tb Samsung F1|1Tb Hitachi 7500k|500Gb Seagate|250Gb Samsung|80Gb WD in Icy Box|2x22" 1650x1080|G9 mouse|G15 KB Win7|Vista|XP|Mint
Reply to moricon
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Can only keep E8400 above 4ghz if I go past 1.4v
Go to:

There are 1044 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them