Well its upto you...
Both the GTX 260 core 216 and the 4870 1GB are very good..Either of those will give you high performance...
But WAIT for few more days. BOth ATI and Nvidia are set to launch new cards...So you will be able to get a very good deal then...
I agree with gkay09.Bothe the 4870 and GTX260 are good performers for around 200.But as stated by gkay,wait a couple weeks and you may get the card for even less.I actually have bothe those cards and am quite happy with the performance of them.I have 4 different systems.
Dahak
ASUS P5N-D
C2D E8500 STOCK
ZALMAN 9700 CPU COOLER
2X2GIG DDR2 1066 IN DC MODE
TOUGHPOWER 850WATT PSU
EVGA GTX 260
SMILIDON RAIDMAX GAMING CASE
LG 24IN WS LCD 1920X1080
250GIG HD/500GIG HD
LOGITECH G15 GAMING KEYBOARD
G5 GAMING MOUSE
LOGITECH Z-5500 5.1 SURROUND SYSTEM
500WATS CONTINUOUS,1000 PEAK
WIN XP PRO
Message edited by Dahak on 04-01-2009 at 11:29:31 AM
they are about as even as you can get, each one trades off being better than the other depending on which game your playing. So my advice...flip a coin or pick the one you think looks better lol thats about all i can tell you
Don't buy any 260 or 4870 at $200 now. If you really want an Nvidia, wait 1-2 weeks and see how the 275gtx pans out. If the benchmarks are reliable, and the 275gtx can be found in stock then it will probably be the card you want.
You could also buy a 4890 now for very close to $200-$220 (prices will drop every day), and that is well worth paying the extra for compared to the 260 or 4870.
Message edited by jennyh on 04-04-2009 at 02:35:56 AM
I guess I'll wait a week or two, that's a good suggestion. Now I need to get a processor, I'm leading toward the Intel Core 2 duo E8500, what does everybody think?
if u still want to spend less than that u could go with a dual-core rather than quad-core and u could go with 4GB of ram rather than 8GB, but thats up to you. Let me know if u need any other suggestions.
One more thing, if you want to save money without sacrificing performance you could go with an AMD/ATI based build, let me know if that would be something u want to consider. IMO u should go with amd/ati but thats just my personal preference.
Is it going to be slower than the one I showed since it has 2.66GHz instead of 3.16GHz, sorry, I'm kind of a noob when it comes to this stuff. On some of the reviews I've seen they say the duo is better than quad right now since games don't take advantage of the quad.
Is it going to be slower than the one I showed since it has 2.66GHz instead of 3.16GHz, sorry, I'm kind of a noob when it comes to this stuff. On some of the reviews I've seen they say the duo is better than quad right now since games don't take advantage of the quad.
There are going to be new games that take definite advantage of quad-cores. A quad is going to be more future proof.
Alright that sounds good, but would AMD be better?
ur going to get very mixed opinions about this, i personally think AMD is better because they are cheaper. With intel ur paying for the brand, but then again this is just my opinion, lots of people think intel is more reliable than AMD and maybe it is but who knows.
so many choices, what do you mean a dragon platform?
The Dragon platform is a Phenom II processor, a 790GX motherboard, and a 4800 series graphics card. (the RAM doesnt matter)
Honestly, it is a cheaper alternative to what lasoski suggested. It is supposed to get very good gaming performance as well.
That is a nice PSU. Its a recommended brand (or at least one that I would recommend).
That is a great CPU. It can overclock well, despite already being at 2.8GHz, and it is quad-core.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.