Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > Holy Memory overloads Batman!!!!!!!

Holy Memory overloads Batman!!!!!!!

Forum Graphic & Displays : ATI - Holy Memory overloads Batman!!!!!!!

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Well I thought 1Gb was a lot for a single GPU until I saw this:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814102826

And no its not a typo or a X2. Its a 4870 2GB. It has 2GB of GDDR5 and so far since it is using better caps people have been able to hit 810MHz +/- core and 1025MHz (4100MHz effective) +/- in overclocking.

Now most games today may not benefit from this much like most games from yesterday didn't really benefit from 1Gb or even 512MB a while back. But I am thinking if more games come out like Crysis (who love large high quality textures and gobble up VRAM) or GTA IV that load a lot of textures into memory (when I max out GTA IV now it uses all of my current 1GB card) this may be decent.

Or it could be a cheaper (when the price goes down) alternative to a 4870X2 since whne in CF if you have 2 512MB cards you have 512MB of VRAM and so on and so forth.

So thoughts anyone?


Message edited by jimmysmitty on 04-02-2009 at 05:23:46 AM
------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I would say it depends on how long you intend on keeping the card.

Over 2 years... maybe.

Under 2 years... no.

1 year or less... absolutely no.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

Im thinking we arent far from a larher amount of 1 gig cards being mainstream. 2 gigs? Who knows? We will have alot more in DX11, and it could require it in some games, more than we see today

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

I have always been the one to jump ahead of the crowd. Back in 2007 when people said quad would be useless in games I said nay and got one. Now quads are starting to be utilized.

I also got SATA when it first hit knowing it would benefit a system.

For this I am tempted. I went with a 1GB 2900Pro because I try to make my systems last longer. Now that Rockstar has a engine that uses a lot we may see games in the future that can utilize 1GB +. Makes me want one.

I know I will get a 4870 to replace my 2900 in the near future. I am tempted between this or Sapphires Toxic edition thats OCed pretty nicely stock itself and shows good return in games. Choices.... they always suck.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

So you are saying this is just a 4890 but clocked to a 4870 speed?

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

jimmysmitty wrote :

I have always been the one to jump ahead of the crowd. Back in 2007 when people said quad would be useless in games I said nay and got one. Now quads are starting to be utilized.

I also got SATA when it first hit knowing it would benefit a system.

For this I am tempted. I went with a 1GB 2900Pro because I try to make my systems last longer. Now that Rockstar has a engine that uses a lot we may see games in the future that can utilize 1GB +. Makes me want one.

I know I will get a 4870 to replace my 2900 in the near future. I am tempted between this or Sapphires Toxic edition thats OCed pretty nicely stock itself and shows good return in games. Choices.... they always suck.





Well that is fine and all, but if you watch what happens when you jump ahead and buy the newest, latest, bestest, most EXPENSIVE.....what usually happens is by the time you really get to make use of it, there are less expensive options available that perform better than what you have.
Personally, I only buy hardware that is about 6 months to a 1 year old. Fewer bugs, way less expensive, and the performance gap in real world use is not far at all behind the new, more pricey hardware.
But to each his own, and his wallet!


Message edited by jitpublisher on 04-02-2009 at 03:50:19 PM
Reply to jitpublisher
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > Holy Memory overloads Batman!!!!!!!
Go to:

There are 993 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them