Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Ati 4890 vs Nvidia 275 vote

Ati 4890 vs Nvidia 275 vote

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Ati 4890 vs Nvidia 275 vote

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Which one you preffer ? or would buy ?




Warning, if you click on "see results", you won't be able to vote
Word :    Username :           
 

And the winner is ?? Personally I'm thinking of buying the zotac amp edition of 275
Core Clock: 702MHz vs. Stock 633MHz
Shader Clock: 1512MHz vs. Stock 1404MHz
Memory Clock: 2520MHz vs. Stock 2268MHz GDDR3
Stream Processors: 240 and 5 years warranty


Message edited by morfinel on 04-02-2009 at 06:44:24 PM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Neither is the winner. They are both massaged versions of current products and continue the dead heat the GTX 260 (216) and HD 4870 were in. Flip a coin or go with your brand loyalty. You'll game great regardless.

Reply to jeffredo

Why? there arent even retail versionsof the 275 out there yet.. how can anyone possibly make an educated vote on this poll at this point in time.. Its pretty clear that both cards are almost identical.. if and when the 275 is released on mass we will almost certainly see the same thing we did with teh 260 and 4870 last summer. Take your pic, flip a coin, same old story.

Reply to daedalus685

I have list of 4 e-retailers that already sell 275 and its the voute based on reviews and specification not feedback on product.

Reply to morfinel

Looking at the benchmarks, there is no contest, it's the 275.

Reply to computertech82
- -1 +

It's no contest? No, it isn't. 4890 matches the 285 and 275 goes dooown. Damn nvidia faggy fanboy. ***.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3539&p=23

------------------------------ AMD Phenom II 955 AM3
ASUS MA79T Deluxe
XFX ATI 4890
6GB DDR3 1600MHz
Reply to AMD4Life

I would probably go with the 4890, but the gtx 275 isn't a bad choice either. I have owned both nvidia and ati products and have liked both. The deciding factors for me are price and future plans. If you have an SLI board and want to SLI in the future or you are a fan of nvidia, go with the 275. If you have a crossfire capable board and want to crossfire in the future or if you want a slightly better price/performance ratio, go with the 4890.

------------------------------ Q9400 @ 3.4
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
2x2 Corsair Dominator 1066
Crossfire ASUS TOP 4850's
Reply to cappster

I know this thread is old, but just to clear things up for the readers here are the facts:

The GTX 275 tends to be faster when compared stock vs stock, but in my opinion it is not enough to justify the extra $$. The Sapphire Toxic/Atomic editions best the GTX 285 at stock and overclock very well after that and tend to trade blows with it, though from my experience they seem to come out on top.

The 4890 is a great card for the price.

Reply to The_Blood_Raven
- 0 +

The price of the GTX 275 is a bit more expensive. I'd have to go with 4890.

Reply to Armi
- 0 +

though I voted for the 4890 I am tempted by the improved visuals PhysX can offer - based on a few youtube examples I saw ages back, seemed pretty impressive !
Anyone think that PhysX is a descision breaker ???

but Asus (with Voltage Tweak for extra OCing) and others are selling cheap, £160 ish, 4890 that come with 950MHz core and 3900MHz mem

Dam tempting...

...but I think my trusty old 8800GT will hold me out till next Gen comes for my old 22" CRT 1600x1200 gaming

and then 1900x1200 gaming goodness on new screen too ^^

Reply to Pailin

PhysX is 100% useless and will NEVER amount to any tangible difference, those videos you watched were false.

If you can hold out, the smart thing would be to wait until the DX11 cards come out.

Reply to The_Blood_Raven
- 0 +

The cards are pretty much identical on performance, the 4890 is what $40-$50 cheaper? Unless you desperately need PhysX it's a no-brainer. The 275 is a good solid card though, definitely the top end Nvidia choice which basically makes it 1 of only 2 Nvidia cards worth buying, the other being the gtx260 although with the current 4870 prices even that is beginning to look very overpriced.


Message edited by jennyh on 06-27-2009 at 12:08:39 AM
Reply to jennyh
- 0 +

yeah, that all sounds about right and would prefer to buy ATI and support the underdog anyway

especially as they have the (better - maybe) cheaper card :)


Cheers

Reply to Pailin
- 0 +

i have to agree with The_Blood_Raven just wait you are not going to DIE. Its unreasonable to buy a 250-350 card knowing AT LEAST there will be a newer better faster AND cheaper (40nm). Stock VS stock 275 wins but almost all owners oc the graphic card and if you dont believe me i say it clear Most of the readers of a review to any graphics card checks the overclocking of the card. any reader checks the oc ability of the vga. so After oc i must say most 4890 variants beat the 275 if u r going to die either get the atomic 4890 or 275 FTW. or wait for msi gtx 275 lightning black edition ;) i think it tops all

Reply to MO BEEJ
- 0 +

reason HD4890 is cheaper and can be alot faster than even a GTX285 basicly its bites

------------------------------ Q9550 3.8Ghz//ramapge formular//OCZ reaper 4Gb// 3 seagate HDDs// sapphire HD4870 512 // CM HAF 932
Reply to AMG

i currently own a gtx 275 MSI dual frozr edition. It rocks but yet im no nvidia fan boy.. In my own opinion nobody who doesnt own one of these cards should be posting. Your only reading what the internet says and not what you say.. I do agree that ati sometimes has prices beat over Nvidia but i talk to some people who own 4890's in games and my gtx 275 is absolutely destroying them. But to be fair the 4890 and gtx 275 throw punches they were made to compete with eachother. Facts are youll see better gameplay in some games then others depending on the card. The real question is what kind of game are you planning to run?

Reply to matm1234

matm1234 wrote :

i currently own a gtx 275 MSI dual frozr edition. It rocks but yet im no nvidia fan boy.. In my own opinion nobody who doesnt own one of these cards should be posting. Your only reading what the internet says and not what you say.. I do agree that ati sometimes has prices beat over Nvidia but i talk to some people who own 4890's in games and my gtx 275 is absolutely destroying them. But to be fair the 4890 and gtx 275 throw punches they were made to compete with eachother. Facts are youll see better gameplay in some games then others depending on the card. The real question is what kind of game are you planning to run?



So, listening to professional revewers who make a living at grading cards is stupid, but listening to random stories from people you meet online who may not know a thing about comptuers is the way to go? Logical fail good sir. I got a good laugh from this I must say, damn those phoney reviewers makng *** up eh! I want to listen to uncredited randoms who bought both cards in order to become their own reviewers... far more believeable source as they are not influenced by 'the man.' Damn people for useing viable sources for thier oppinions! Stating thins like that makes you come off as a raving conspiracy nut by the way, though you are certainly not alone in the paranoid thoughts about authority figures (skepticism is good, blindness not so much)..

Both are fine cards, if one is too dim to get thier 4890 working as well as your 275 (or at least close enough not to be 'destroyed') they are not worth the energy to listen to.

If you want to buy both cards go ahead and make your own review.. but enough with your conspiracy mumbo-jumbo about reviews (granted some are idiots, but if you are unable to rank the validity of a review based on sources, settings, etc. you shuld not be on the internet.)

To add, I feel dirty for posting in a thread that was useless in april...

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

To mach trolling form both sides (ati fanboys and nvidia fanboys).

That is wrong with this fanboys is (ATI or NVIDIA) giving them a share of its profits to support it to death?

The truth is that both cards perform the same.

Reply to Successful_troll

matm1234 wrote :

i currently own a gtx 275 MSI dual frozr edition. It rocks but yet im no nvidia fan boy.. In my own opinion nobody who doesnt own one of these cards should be posting. Your only reading what the internet says and not what you say.. I do agree that ati sometimes has prices beat over Nvidia but i talk to some people who own 4890's in games and my gtx 275 is absolutely destroying them. But to be fair the 4890 and gtx 275 throw punches they were made to compete with eachother. Facts are youll see better gameplay in some games then others depending on the card. The real question is what kind of game are you planning to run?



The GTX 275 performs slightly better than a 4890, but in no way destroys it. However, for the price of that card you could get a Toxic or Atomic edition of the 4890 which both best a slightly factory overclocked GTX 285, and damn near run neck and neck with it when both are overclocked. That said your card is a great on still and if you SLI it later you will be in gaming heaven. Just try to keep things in prospective, none of the cards will ever destroy the other because at most we are talking about a 10 paper FPS difference that equates to basically nothing in gaming experience.

Reply to The_Blood_Raven
- 0 +

Successful_troll wrote :

To mach trolling form both sides (ati fanboys and nvidia fanboys).

That is wrong with this fanboys is (ATI or NVIDIA) giving them a share of its profits to support it to death?

The truth is that both cards perform the same.




excatly, however HD4890 gives that same for less, so it should be a no brainer yes? unless you will hate ATI

------------------------------ Q9550 3.8Ghz//ramapge formular//OCZ reaper 4Gb// 3 seagate HDDs// sapphire HD4870 512 // CM HAF 932
Reply to AMG
- 0 +

Have any of you PhysX fanbois ever tryed to run it on the same card thats doing the rendering? It sucks (at least in UTIII). It will drag your framerates to sh*t, if your going to use an nVidia card for PhysX, make sure its not the same one your using to render the game.

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3073/2578392638_2827857d10_o.png
Reply to B-Unit
- 0 +

The HD 4890 is generally cheaper, but that doesn't mean it is always better. In addition to price, the winner of the HD 4890 / GTX 275 debate can also be determined by what kind of games one plays (ex - Mirror's Edge, Battle Forge), whether or not they believe in the advantages of CUDA, PhysX, and/or DX 10.1, how much they like to fold, and where one gets their information...

Examples of articles / benchmarks / reviews with sometimes notably different results / conclusions...

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/g [...] gtx-275/18
http://www.techspot.com/review/164 [...] age11.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/v [...] html#sect0
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3539&p=23
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] ,1196.html

Final thoughts:

The HD 4890 does not flat out dominate the GTX 275 and the GTX 275 does not wipe the floor with the HD 4890. Both cards are competitive with each other and offer unique advantages in certain situations.

If you are tight on cash, go for the HD 4890. If you are a little bit better on cash and want a good card with a nice overclock, go with the Zotac card you mentioned in your first post.


Message edited by jzsang on 06-30-2009 at 02:45:46 AM
Reply to jzsang

The GTX275, I've caught so many ATI fans in massive lies, and there must be a reason they constantly feel the need to do such a thing.
Then there is the massive entire added value thing, plus the gigantically superior Nvidia drivers and CP, and ccc is a navigation nightmare and lame and a system hog, and ati has a piddly penny to spend on their driver team and game developement, and is bleeding a billion on only a billion in sales every year.
---
I can't stand amd/ati, nor their little economist minions, so I'll pay twice as much for an Nvidia card, because it is well worth it, and I'm not a grungy pauper crybaby trying to scratch every last penny out of a failing company's in the red bottom line then yapper about how much money it makes in some e-insane quack-- since it might destroy them (not like lowball ati fans give a crap if it does destroy ati, which it might).
If you love a company so much, pay them well for what they produce ! (Oh that's right it's all about proclaiming penny scratching for your own wallet).
-
Nope sorry, I am paying NVIDIA TOP DOLLAR because they ROCK !
Ok ?
Got it ?
I'm not rich by any means, but then I'm not a communist *rick either !
-
Don't even get me started on the power consumption crap talk either. If you're buying a high end vidcard and yer ragging about 25 or 100 watts, you probably should be shoveling the snow instead for a few extra bubble gum bucks.

-So like, it ain't even close.
I've seen 275's with TWO free full $50 games included as well, but never the 4890.
God I hate ati and their minions. I hope they lost the poll, but I had to vote for Nvidia so I didn't see the results.
YEAH mark me up!

Reply to silicondoc

According to THG's GFX performance chart, the GTX275 is significantly better. However, the price difference makes HD4890 a better buy!

Reply to andy5174
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Ati 4890 vs Nvidia 275 vote
Go to:

There are 1122 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them