Hi everyone I would like to ask the community for a simple question,
I'm trying to buy a new graphics card to upgrade my nvidia onboard 8200
The price of the graphics card has to be less than $90 usd, the two cards that I'm looking at are:
If your PSU is up to it (any quality brand/model), then +1@mactronix. If your PSU is poopy, then get the 4670, as it uses less power than the 9600GT.
------------------------------There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Reply to jtt283
I did not mean to imply that the 4670 had better performance; it is one tier LOWER than the 9600GT on Cleeve's chart. A low-powered or poor-quality PSU would have less trouble with a 4670, and with a budget of $90, getting another PSU is not an option.
Of course, the OP hasn't listed his PSU. He may already have an Antec Earthwatts 430 (or 380, or 500, or...) in which case he can run a 4830.
------------------------------There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Reply to jtt283
To be perfectly honest it dosent look good The 4830 uses about 85 Watts at peak which is more than the approx 75 supplied by the PCIE slot.
Obviously this is why it needs a 6 pin PCIE power cable.
Trying to run the card on a weak PSU could blow the card or worse the whole system. Most likley it would either down clock or plain not work but the possability is there and very real.
So to be on the safe side with that PSU the 4670 is the way to go.
To be perfectly honest it dosent look good The 4830 uses about 85 Watts at peak which is more than the approx 75 supplied by the PCIE slot.
Obviously this is why it needs a 6 pin PCIE power cable.
Trying to run the card on a weak PSU could blow the card or worse the whole system. Most likley it would either down clock or plain not work but the possability is there and very real.
So to be on the safe side with that PSU the 4670 is the way to go.
Mactronix
Really? wow well I'm tempted to try anyways even thought I know I shouldn't as for the other two, the 9600GT seems like a better option if I can't get the 4830, thanks for the help, If anyone else wants to suggest something else I'm open to suggestions, less than $90 of course.
Thanks.
Sigma is not a good PSU, and that looks like an old design. The 4670 is a much safer choice.
------------------------------There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Reply to jtt283
and this one. It doesn't specifically mention the new cards but the writer says to wait............. meaning something new and probably a little better is on the way.
The 9600GT is generally faster, so go with that 9600GT especially since it has the nice rebate right now. The only way I'd say go with the 4670 is if you have a crossfire board (which it seems you don't), or if your PSU has a low amp ratting on the 12v rail.
------------------------------Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
Really? wow well I'm tempted to try anyways even thought I know I shouldn't as for the other two, the 9600GT seems like a better option if I can't get the 4830, thanks for the help, If anyone else wants to suggest something else I'm open to suggestions, less than $90 of course.
Thanks.
As you say you are tempted to try it anyway i will just throw this in.
The PCIE slot supplies 75 watts, its generally regarded as a standard but it isnt official.
Now if your PSU has a Native 6 pin PCIE cable, thats built directly into the loom and not made up with adaptors. Then in theory it should run the card or else why is the cable there if it cant deliver the power ?
Again the safe option is not to try it but as you seem likley to i figured you should have as much info as possable in order to make a choice.
If you do try it keep a very close eye on your temps as high temps on the card would be a good indication that its trying to pull more than the PSU can give it.
The 9600GT is junk for gaming. Dont waste your money. If you cant afford a 4830 or 4850, then just save a few more dollars. The 4830 is just as fast as a 9800GT and the 4850 is as fast as the 9800GTX+.
As you say you are tempted to try it anyway i will just throw this in.
The PCIE slot supplies 75 watts, its generally regarded as a standard but it isnt official.
Now if your PSU has a Native 6 pin PCIE cable, thats built directly into the loom and not made up with adaptors. Then in theory it should run the card or else why is the cable there if it cant deliver the power ?
Again the safe option is not to try it but as you seem likley to i figured you should have as much info as possable in order to make a choice.
If you do try it keep a very close eye on your temps as high temps on the card would be a good indication that its trying to pull more than the PSU can give it.
Personally i wouldnt do it but its your rig,
Good luck Mactronix
I appreciate the helpful advice and I do believe it has a native 6 pin cable and so I do believe that it should be able to handle this card and as far as the other two the 9600 GT seems better as you guys have described it, but I'm still looking.
------------------------------||Athlon X2 7750 for 60$ Other Thoughts: How can AMD still be in business if they are selling these for so cheap? The heatsink/fan itself is probably costing them around 10 dollars or so.||
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=548517
Reply to salem80
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.