/ Sign-up
Your question

OCZ RevoDrive 120GB vs. OCZ Vertex 2E 60GB in Raid 5

  • SSD
  • NAS / RAID
  • OCZ
  • Storage
Last response: in Storage
September 30, 2010 5:02:11 AM

It's time for a computer upgrade and my very old OCZ SSD drive has become rather slow and well, lacking in space.

I am currently in a dilemma and cant decide between the OCZ RevoDrive 120GB or buying 3 OCZ ertex 2E drives and placing them into a raid 5 array.

The drive are intended for all purpose from the OS to some of my favourite games, Photoshop etc.

The costs are almost the same and from looking at the specs of the drive, the RevoDrive has a read of 540MB/s and write of 490MB/s whilst the Vertex 2E has a read of 285MB/s and write of 275MB/s.

Essentially in a raid 5 (and as to my knowledge) I should be attaining a read speed of 855MB/s and a write speed of 550MB/s.

From this short conclusion, the Raid 5 setup is a winner.

Can anyone confirm this to me or am I completely wrong?

Thanks for reading and responding :D 

More about : ocz revodrive 120gb ocz vertex 60gb raid

a c 127 G Storage
September 30, 2010 11:49:29 AM

Sequential throughput should not be what you're looking for. Try comparing 4K IOps instead; closer to reality.

Also, keep in mind all write scores are fake; when writing zeroes. In the same way i can make a floppydrive do 10GB/s; simply write zeroes to it, compress it all to one byte per second; done! The real write speeds are about 100MB/s when writing incompressible data such as movies/music and other binary files.

Perhaps you would want to wait until beginning of 2011 when new generation of SSDs presents itself.
September 30, 2010 2:47:55 PM

Thanks for the info, I'll have a look at the 4K IOPs results then which should help.

How would a raid configuration affect the IOPs though or would it at all?

Even more interesting is your comment regarding the new generation of SSDs. Are you referring to the HSDL article here?
Related resources
a c 127 G Storage
September 30, 2010 3:40:10 PM

No i am referring to the new 25nm NAND coupled with new controllers (presumably Intel 6Gbps controller) coming in Februari. Perhaps other SSD vendors also come with innovations.

I'm not a particular fan of HSDL; if you want another interface than SATA then native PCI-express would be the preferred choice.

Regarding RAID performance; SSDs already use 'RAID' internally; RAID0 or striping or interleaving. Whatever you want to call it, it has the same performance characteristics as a RAID0-array.

Consider the Intel X25-M 80GB/160GB; it has 10 channels. Virtually all SSDs have multiple channels. Those multiple channels are always used when doing sequential I/O (large files read/write) but sometimes remain unused when doing random I/O with low queue depth. Advanced SSDs use AHCI/NCQ to allow the OS to send multiple requests at once. This can increase random read performance by a factor up to the number of channels - in this case factor 10. That means that random reads would behave just like a 10-disk RAID0.

You can observe this when doing CrystalDiskMark on Intel X25-M with both IDE mode and AHCI mode. You will see that in IDE mode, the 4K-32 read score is about the same as the normal 4K read score; but when using AHCI, the 4K-32 read score is almost 10 times as high as the 4K read score. This is where the 10 parallel channels come into action.

So to answer your question whether RAID does scale performance: yes it does; SSDs already use this internally. You doing the same with software RAID just means more stripes. This will scale random read, random write, sequential read and sequential write. RAID0 does not only scale sequential I/O; that is a myth. Though the quality of software RAID under Windows can be very poor at times; Intel onboard RAID should be decent.
September 30, 2010 9:01:44 PM

go with the revo!
October 1, 2010 12:09:17 AM

Interesting read on the new SSDs.

Why you say that lardacus? From all I can see, even with the Raid 5 penalty for IOPs, it is still far greater than the RevoDrive.

Also with the RevoDrive, I know my mobo can boot from it as I am not too sure with the RevoDrive. Its a Striker Extreme II I think (socker 775). Not opened the case for a long time and its currently in transit to my new home for a few more weeks.

With my intended upgrade in the near future to the Asus Rampage III Gene, my SLI config will be a tight squeeze and unless I get a bridge or spacer of sorts, it would be hard to fit the RevoDrive in with the VGA both taking up dual slots (or I water cool the whole system and free up the space occupied by the heat sinks).

But yea, why are you so convinced about the RevoDrive?
a b G Storage
October 3, 2010 2:58:58 PM

Well, I'll give it to him, he's not the only one who's convinced with the Revo, I have been using SSDs for sometime and now after a year after it's release, I do feel that the PCIe based storage has the future in it's hands.
A year ago the prices were maddening, but with the down scaling of the OCZ Fatality to a Revo, it became more affordable.
Me for one, would certainly like to see my OS and programs as good as printed on a PCIe Slot instead of a HDD anymore.
I'd love to leave the HDD for my Movies, Data and Music.
And yes, these drives are bootable so they certainly do take the cake.