Crysis?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Crysis?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

which is the best combination for crysis? (for all parts, not graphic and displays only!!)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Please ask this in the Homebuilt section.
And do n`t double post.

Reply to coozie7
- 0 +

There is no certain combination for Crysis.
But there ARE several parts that will play it without a problem.
I assume that you want to game on ultra high settings, but what resolution are you planning on playing at?

Reply to boudy

SLI Nvidia high end graphic cards with an Intel i7...probably a 920 is the best performance /$$ and of course an x58 mobo with 6GB RAM kit and to top it off a proper PSU to push it all

Reply to SpinachEater

Crysis is a joke. If your building a system around Crysis, you should see a psychiatrist.

------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh
- 1 +

zipzoomflyhigh wrote :

Crysis is a joke. If your building a system around Crysis, you should see a psychiatrist.



If you build a rig for the one of the most hardware intensive game, then you will be able to play almost anything else.

Reply to boudy
- 0 +

Under more info look at my rig. Im able to run crysis @ 1920X1080 with all the setting max with 16aa avg 30fps

Reply to invisik
- 0 +

quad coore, crossfire/sli, lot's of ram, nice monitor.

Reply to mamw93

This is the only PC/server able to run Crysis at Ultra High @ maxed out resolution.


http://atlasfolding.com/

Reply to Bluescreendeath

invisik wrote :

Under more info look at my rig. Im able to run crysis @ 1920X1080 with all the setting max with 16aa avg 30fps


dude how the hell do you have you 260 oc to 730 i have sli 285 and i cant get mine to oc above 700 i have tried with nvidia software and rivatuner and to be exact my top speed it 700 my temp does not go above 63 just very unstable above 700

Reply to Brandon00000
- 0 +

Brandon00000 wrote :

dude how the hell do you have you 260 oc to 730 i have sli 285 and i cant get mine to oc above 700 i have tried with nvidia software and rivatuner and to be exact my top speed it 700 my temp does not go above 63 just very unstable above 700



You just answered your own question, he has a GTX 260 and you have a GTX 285. Why exactly would you think that your GTX 285 should be able to overclock more? Just because it is a faster card does not mean it can overclock more.

Reply to boudy

boudy wrote :

You just answered your own question, he has a GTX 260 and you have a GTX 285. Why exactly would you think that your GTX 285 should be able to overclock more? Just because it is a faster card does not mean it can overclock more.




well the fact that the 285 starts off with a faster clock i understand that some cards do overclock better than others i just find it hard to believe a 260 can oc over a oc 285 the most you can get a 285 is like 750 i have not been able to do it thats why i was asking how you did it so i can do it myself

Reply to Brandon00000
- 0 +

Brandon00000 wrote :

well the fact that the 285 starts off with a faster clock i understand that some cards do overclock better than others i just find it hard to believe a 260 can oc over a oc 285 the most you can get a 285 is like 750 i have not been able to do it thats why i was asking how you did it so i can do it myself



OIC
Well just think about this: you are faster without an overclock anyway ;)

Reply to boudy

boudy wrote :

OIC
Well just think about this: you are faster without an overclock anyway ;)



not really i cant get 700 he claims to get 730

Reply to Brandon00000

if that is the case why buy a 285 if you can oc a 260 more

Reply to Brandon00000

maybe he meant to say 630

Reply to Brandon00000
- 0 +

Brandon00000 wrote :

not really i cant get 700 he claims to get 730



Not Core speed-wise, but performance-wise you have the faster card
Look at the difference in specs here: http://www.nvidia.com/object/produ [...] 85_us.html
and this is the GTX 260: http://www.nvidia.com/object/produ [...] 60_us.html (btw on the GTX 260, the core 216 has 216 processing cores, not 192)

There are many factors that contribute to performance, but sometimes you dont even need a high overclock.

.......oh, and nice triple-posts there XD

Reply to boudy
- 0 +

boudy wrote :

If you build a rig for the one of the most hardware intensive game, then you will be able to play almost anything else.



Precisely. Most people fail to realize this.

Okay, here's one. You didn't give a budget, but anyway.

i7 920.
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R-SLI (cheapest X58) otherwise Asus P6T
3 or 6 GB DDR3 1333/1600
Hard Drive- whatever you want. Velociraptor/SSD if you can afford.
GTX260 SLI/ GTX 295 (again cost is the deciding factor)
Antec 900
Corsair TX750
Any 24" monitor (if you're interested in Nvidia 3Dvision, get what they give you. Its a 22" Samsung 120Hz)

+1 for the above post again. Anyway, a 30MHz difference is not that much practically. You can say this is 700 and that is 730, but when you play, it might be just a 1-2 fps difference.


Message edited by rags_20 on 04-10-2009 at 11:28:40 AM
------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20
- 0 +

invisik wrote :

Under more info look at my rig. Im able to run crysis @ 1920X1080 with all the setting max with 16aa avg 30fps


I don't understand why you have 6GB on a Core 2 system. 4 will do fine. 6 is kind of odd. Is it 2x2 + 2x1?

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

invisik wrote :

Under more info look at my rig. Im able to run crysis @ 1920X1080 with all the setting max with 16aa avg 30fps



Why people use 16xAA(1920X1080) in crysis, is much better to have 4xAA and avg 50fps instead or 30fps.
I have similar system with you (q6600@3.2GHz GTX295) and I run crysis @ 1680X1050 8xAA ultra high setting avg53fps, max71, min35fps.

Reply to michaelmk86
- 0 +

Brandon00000: you can achieve higher clocks by upping the voltage on the cards. This also will produce much more heat make sure to turn fan speed up. I used evga voltage tuner. (remember overclocking result varies from card to card)

 

rags_20: 2x2 2x1 is correct i had a spare of 2x1 left so i just stuck it in there lol didnt want to waste it.

 

michaelmk86: Thanks for the advice i just assumed 16aa was a lot better but ill give 4aa a shot.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by invisik on 04-10-2009 at 03:32:54 PM
Reply to invisik

invisik wrote :

Brandon00000: you can achieve higher clocks by upping the voltage on the cards. This also will produce much more heat make sure to turn fan speed up. I used evga voltage tuner. (remember overclocking result varies from card to card)

rags_20: 2x2 2x1 is correct i had a spare of 2x1 left so i just stuck it in there lol didnt want to waste it.

michaelmk86: Thanks for the advice i just assumed 16aa was a lot better but ill give 4aa a shot.




i am aware of that i just thought evga tuner was just for evga cards the only way i have found to up the voltage on the 285 is the evga volt tuner but unfortunatly i have bfg

Reply to Brandon00000
- 0 +

Evga v tuner is exclusive to evga cards. I believe you can bump up the voltage through rivatuner also.

Reply to invisik
- 0 +

Does EVGA tuner work on ATI cards? Is there some program like that for ATI cards? Mine runs at 67C max, so I have about 15C to spare.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20
- 0 +

No response from OP to any of the posts. OP, please state your budget.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20
- 0 +

You can use ati tool or rivatuner, but i would suggest just use the overclocking feature in the ati catalyst which works great.

Reply to invisik

invisik wrote :

You can use ati tool or rivatuner, but i would suggest just use the overclocking feature in the ati catalyst which works great.



i have tried rivatuner ati tool evga voltage tuner not one of them worked and rivatuner and ati tool neither one have i found where it gives you the option to increase voltage any help i would be very thankful that would be awesome if i could get a 750 core clock

Reply to Brandon00000
- 0 +

^+1
You can even go 285 SLI if you want. I'd say 1000W is more than necessary. 850 should be fine. And I don't think 300GB should be enough. So get a 1 TB barracuda.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20
- 0 +

Alright, so since you didnt give a price limit here:

Video Card: 2 GTX 275s in SLI - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814130475
MOBO:Asrock X58 Supercomputer - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813157150
CPU: Core i7 920 - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115202
RAM: 6GB DDR3 GSKILL at 1333 - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231223
Case and PSU combo: Antec 1200 and a 1000W continuous PSU - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Comb [...] mbo.178066
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 1.5TB - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6822148337

Total: $1,966.93 with shipping

The alternative, of course, is AMD/ATI (NOTE: I will only be changing the video card, mobo, and CPU):

Video Card: 2 4890s in Crossfire - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814102830
Mobo: ASUS M4A79T Deluxe - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813131363
CPU: Phenom II X4 - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819103471

Total: $1,810.48 with shipping

NOTE: The AMD/ATI alternative would only be to save money. There is no performance gain there.

hmmm that was weird....I tried to edit my post but it just deleted it.....

Reply to boudy

just about every configuration sucks on crysis that is mainstream...

lets see... 2 4870x2's work good and 3 GTX 285s work excelent!
quad cores offer minimal performance increase for crysis btw.

Reply to rambo117

http://media.bestofmicro.com/W/2/176114/original/gtx-295_chart-03.png
DirectX 10, benchmark tool


Message edited by michaelmk86 on 04-11-2009 at 10:59:47 AM
Reply to michaelmk86

Possibly a little off topic, but seeing as this is in the graphics section...

How well can I expect Crysis to run on a Geforce 9400/9500 or 9800? I know it won't be fantastic, but I'm putting together an inexpensive midrange system and I'd like to get something it can stretch its legs on that's a bit newer than Oblivion (which oddly enough runs great on my ancient minimum-specs system...) and Crysis looked great on the machines at CES last year.

Reply to novusbogus

novusbogus wrote :

Possibly a little off topic, but seeing as this is in the graphics section...

 

How well can I expect Crysis to run on a Geforce 9400/9500 or 9800? I know it won't be fantastic, but I'm putting together an inexpensive midrange system and I'd like to get something it can stretch its legs on that's a bit newer than Oblivion (which oddly enough runs great on my ancient minimum-specs system...) and Crysis looked great on the machines at CES last year.

 

Well considering the graph above:
9400GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 2fps
9500GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 4fps
9800GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 17fps
GTX280 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 30fps
GTX295 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 48fps

 

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by michaelmk86 on 04-11-2009 at 12:16:32 PM
Reply to michaelmk86
- 0 +

michaelmk86 wrote :

Well considering the graph above:
9400GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 2fps
9500GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 4fps
9800GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 17fps
GTX280 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 30fps
GTX295 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 48fps



Ask me and I say its is NOT worth the performance sacrifice just for AA. Run it at Very High and native resolution unless you have GTX 285 SLI or 4870x2 or GTX295 or something like that.

Oh and how did you make such accurate predictions? 17fps?

Lets just say that 9400GT/9500GT are playable at 1680x1050 no AA Low
9800GT - 1680 x 1050 no AA High
GTX285 1680x1050 4xAA Very High

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

rags_20 wrote :

Ask me and I say its is NOT worth the performance sacrifice just for AA. Run it at Very High and native resolution unless you have GTX 285 SLI or 4870x2 or GTX295 or something like that.

 

Oh and how did you make such accurate predictions? 17fps?

 

Lets just say that 9400GT/9500GT are playable at 1680x1050 no AA Low
9800GT - 1680 x 1050 no AA High
GTX285 1680x1050 4xAA Very High


I think you need to have a closer look as those benches
0xAA = no AA, this results is without AA

 

9800GT 1680x1050 0xAA veryhigh 17fps : that is not a prediction is from a benchmark with identical setting with the above graph

 

9500GT is playable at 1280x1024 no AA Low setting
9400GT is playable at 800x600 no AA Low setting

 

GTX285 1680x1050 4xAA Very High: 24fps(totally unplayable) and this is not prediction is from a benchmark…

 


Message edited by michaelmk86 on 04-11-2009 at 01:50:22 PM
Reply to michaelmk86
- 0 +

24fps may not be playable to you, but it is to me. Guess I have better eyes. And about the AA. It was just a general statement. Not based on your previous thread.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

24fps is not playable. :non:
Note: the 24fps in crysis are from the benchmark in the first level of the game the levels that follows are mach more demanding (in terms of graphics) and the average fps from 24 will drop to 20fps and the minimum fps will be 10fps.

 

So everybody agree that in crysis benchmark you need to have:
35fps avg to be just playable.
50-60fps avg to be enjoyable.
100+ fps avg for perfect experience.

 

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by michaelmk86 on 04-11-2009 at 03:23:50 PM
Reply to michaelmk86
- 0 +

Brandon00000 wrote :

i have tried rivatuner ati tool evga voltage tuner not one of them worked and rivatuner and ati tool neither one have i found where it gives you the option to increase voltage any help i would be very thankful that would be awesome if i could get a 750 core clock




Well ati tool i believe is only for overclocking not voltage change and rivatuner im not to sure since i have never used it myself but i hear people using it to overclock/volt change. Im really new into voltage changing so im kinda limited on that. You might want to start a new thread people familiar with rivatuner can help you more. Evga voltage tuner should work what nvidia drivers do you have installed?

Reply to invisik

if 24fps is playable to you then you have worse eyes.

feels weird since 35-40fps is only just playable to me.

Reply to Helloworld_98
- 0 +

michaelmk86 wrote :

24fps is not playable. :non:
Note: the 24fps in crysis are from the benchmark in the first level of the game the levels that follows are mach more demanding (in terms of graphics) and the average fps from 24 will drop to 20fps and the minimum fps will be 10fps.

So everybody agree that in crysis benchmark you need to have:
35fps avg to be just playable.
50-60fps avg to be enjoyable.
100+ fps avg for perfect experience.


Like I said, that is from your pov. I get 24fps on the Crysis GPU benchmark and it is perfectly playable in the first level, Contact. However I still run settings to get 40 fps avg. PS. The zero gravity levels result in lower fps than normal ones due to increased physics calculations.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

my first crysis run through was with an athlon x2 / 8600gt 256mb. played it on a mix of high/medium settings and of course no AA @1440x900 dx9. the scenery still blew me away.

Reply to wh3resmycar

welll, when i run stalker clear sky with EVERYTHING on high, it dips down all the way to 12fps but the environment is GOREGEOUS! look at those sun rays... :)
(totally off topic but oh well lol)

Reply to rambo117

michaelmk86 wrote :

24fps is not playable. :non:
Note: the 24fps in crysis are from the benchmark in the first level of the game the levels that follows are mach more demanding (in terms of graphics) and the average fps from 24 will drop to 20fps and the minimum fps will be 10fps.

So everybody agree that in crysis benchmark you need to have:
35fps avg to be just playable.
50-60fps avg to be enjoyable.
100+ fps avg for perfect experience.



Where did you get those completely random numbers? 100+ fps for perfect experience? Yeh right, 2 GTX295s can't even get 60 fps average, let alone 100. Your values are completely arbitrary with no factual basis.


The playable fps for most first person shooters is 30. Halo 3 on the XBOX360 runs locked at 30 frames per second.

The human eye usually can't tell the difference beyond 60 fps.

And considering that most LCD monitors have refresh rates of 60-75, that means your screen doesn't even render past 60-75 fps on your monitor.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Bluescreendeath on 04-11-2009 at 07:46:10 PM
------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath

Bluescreendeath wrote :

Where did you get those completely random numbers? 100+ fps for perfect experience? Yeh right, 2 GTX295s can't even get 60 fps average, let alone 100. Your values are completely arbitrary with no factual basis.


The playable fps for most first person shooters is 30. Halo 3 on the XBOX360 runs locked at 30 frames per second.

The human eye usually can't tell the difference beyond 60 fps.

And considering that most LCD monitors have refresh rates of 60-75, that means your screen doesn't even render past 60-75 fps on your monitor.



This numbers are not random 100fps is the average that means that if you have 100fps average you will have 60fps minimum, and yes 2 GTX295s can get 80fps very high settings(and if you lower the setting you will get 100fps avg)

These are facts and I don’t care if you agree or not
35fps avg to be just playable.
50-60fps avg to be enjoyable.
100+ fps avg for perfect experience.

Reply to michaelmk86

invisik wrote :

Well ati tool i believe is only for overclocking not voltage change and rivatuner im not to sure since i have never used it myself but i hear people using it to overclock/volt change. Im really new into voltage changing so im kinda limited on that. You might want to start a new thread people familiar with rivatuner can help you more. Evga voltage tuner should work what nvidia drivers do you have installed?





evga voltage tuner only works with evga cards i have bfg

------------------------------ q6600 2.4 oc 3.17 8 gigs ddr2 800
1000 watt psu
p5n-d mb 2 gtx 285 sli
hp 2408 monitor
Reply to Brandon00000

michaelmk86 wrote :

This numbers are not random 100fps is the average that means that if you have 100fps average you will have 60fps minimum, and yes 2 GTX295s can get 80fps very high settings(and if you lower the setting you will get 100fps avg)

These are facts and I don’t care if you agree or not
35fps avg to be just playable.
50-60fps avg to be enjoyable.
100+ fps avg for perfect experience.




These aren't facts. These are just fps numbers you think are good for playing Crysis...numbers that you've probably never even tested.


Message edited by Bluescreendeath on 04-12-2009 at 01:25:22 AM
------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath
- 0 +

^+10000000
What's he talking about? 100+ fps, isn't that great? Perfect experience. You just don't know what you're talking about. You don't understand that after a certain point it makes no difference what fps you get. Like I said, the playable fps varies from person to person.

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

RAID a couple of OCZ Vertex drives or Intel X25s.

If you are playing on Very High mode, with the large textures being streamed in real time, you need very high random and sequential read performance.

Even though my system (i7 920 @ 3.8GHz, SLI 285 SSC) was running in the 50s-60s fps at Very High 1920, the game stuttered every few moments while in movement. Basically it was a disc I/O bottleneck. RAID X25-Es solved the problem, now the game is buttery smooth.

Reply to astrallite
- 0 +

Brandon00000 wrote :

evga voltage tuner only works with evga cards i have bfg

 


start a new thread regarding voltage increase on your graphic card since i havent used any other program but evga v tuner. sorry.

 


What is he talking about? The human eye cant tell apart 60fps or 1000fps lol.


Message edited by invisik on 04-12-2009 at 03:45:14 AM
Reply to invisik
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Crysis?
Go to:

There are 896 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them