Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > General Motherboard > Future investment : x16 lanes

Future investment : x16 lanes

Forum Motherboards & Memory : General Motherboard - Future investment : x16 lanes

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Since the comming of dx 11 card soon, would it be a wise choice to invest in the NF200 controller for the reason that the cards might acutally exceed pci 2.0 x8 lanes?

Addtional, Does a somewhat oced gtx 285 exceed a x8 lane bandwidth??

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

so with the same logic, a x16 x16 for gtx 285 in SLI should hold no difference in x8 x 8 gtx 285 in SLI (For the P55, core i5 thing?)

Reply to unlimitedro

http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,2379.html
that should answer your question :)

1. How does incorporating 16 lanes of PCI Express 2.0 onto the Lynnfield die affect performance? The answer depends on how many graphics cards you’re using, but is mostly academic with this generation of GPUs. The more pressing concern should be finding a Core i5 that’s fast enough to actually let modern graphics cards stretch their proverbial legs. It all goes back to the concept of building balanced PCs. If you’re going to spend close to a grand on 3D horsepower, you’ll need a heavily-overclocked processor in order to keep pace. With a single Radeon HD 4870 X2, we saw some theoretical advantages to serving all 16 lanes through an on-die controller versus using X58.

2. Will Core i5 handicap you right out of the gate with multi-card configurations? The aforementioned gains evaporated in real-world games, where Core i7’s trended slightly higher, perhaps as a result of Hyper-Threading or its additional memory channel. With two cards installed, Core i5 simply didn’t gain as much performance as Core i7 at high resolutions. It wasn’t, however, noticeably handicapped, and was still able to deliver more performance than Core 2 Quad (also limited to a pair of x8 connections via P45).

3. Are eight lanes per card enough? Almost certainly, yes…in this story. There is a perceivable performance ding associated with halving PCI Express bandwidth when two cards are installed. However, if you flip over to our Core i5 and Core i7 gaming analysis, which tests these two new chips with Turbo Boost turned on, you'll see that in most cases, the higher clocks measured there are able to make up some of the losses at low resolutions, while high-res tests demonstrate very close performance between the mainstream P55 platform and higher-end X58-based configurations.

4. How will P55 compare to X58, P45, and 790GX? Naturally, X58 has an advantage in that it’s able to serve up twin x16 links and communicate with the CPU across a 25 GB/s+ QPI interconnect. P55, P45, and 790GX all force you to split connectivity up unto smaller links if you run multiple graphics cards, though. Integrating that functionality into the processor die looks to be a good thing for Core i5, especially given the motherboard/processor prices we're expecting immediately after launch.

Reply to Maziar
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > General Motherboard > Future investment : x16 lanes
Go to:

There are 1347 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them