Ok to mix DDR333 with DDR400?

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630
I've got a 512 stick of DDR333 and a 512 stick of DDR400. I'm going to be running Windows 7 (just for kicks).

I should just go with both sticks and a lower overall memory speed than just one stick of 512mb DDR400, right?

Or, should I go with just the DDR400 and hope I don't run out of ram?

I'm thinking both. Right? :heink:
 

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630
Intel® Celeron® D Processor 352
(512KB L2 cache, 3.20GHz, 533MHz FSB)

Zenthar, I'm hearing you with the 1gb of ram...
 

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630
HA! So I booted the eMachine and went into the BIOS. Turns out, it's running both sticks at 400mhz. Ever heard of that? Weird... hopefully, I'm stable
 

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630
Yeah, it is actually running fine... Windows 7 boots quickly and runs smoothly. I'm actually at 768mb, also, because of the 256 shared memory.

That's the only thing this computer is missing: decent video. I'm going to run clockgen on the FSB and see if I can push it a little bit after I figure out if the memory is a-ok
 

AMDThunder

Distinguished
Feb 18, 2006
1,239
0
19,310


Agreed. That was supposed to be one of the improvements of Win7. Vista is a hog. Can't wait till they ship my copy of 7.
 

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630
How many memtest86+ passes do you reckon I should run? It just finished without any errors. Maybe one more, for good measure?
 

yobigd20

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2008
82
0
18,630
Your bottleneck is going to be the amount of RAM (megabytes), not the speed. So yes, while both sticks will run at the lower speed (333), your system should be more responsive in multitasking due to the higher amount of ram in the system. Honestly though, you shouldn't really be running a windows 7 o.s. with less than 2gb IMO.
 

diznanl

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2009
83
0
18,630


As posted above, the ram is running at 400mhz ... don't know why. But it is!