I'm building a computer for someone who wants it specifically for Flight Sim X. Its important it runs Flight Sim X the best, for the budget, which is quite limited ($550), so he is sacrificing how future proof it is as long as it runs this game well. Already have Windows XP.
Total is $560 after shipping, (so I'm already $10 over which I'm not worried about).
My question to you is, should I got ATI on graphics (if I recall FSX likes nVidia more then ATI and the card I put on there is a beefy nVidia card). Should I get a quad core processor, and a weaker graphics card? I think I've got the best bang for the buck. He was quite pleased with FSX performance on my rig which is in my profile, and this computer has a much better GPU, with a CPU only 100 MHz slower (my CPU was only running at 2.8 GHz at the time he saw it).
My understanding is the Flight Sim X was highly cpu dependant, I could be wrong. Don't get that powersupply. Get a good quality one from PC power and cooling, antec, or the like. A bad powersupply could destroy all of your components. You sacrificed a lot of components to get that graphics card. A more balanced system should have a low end core2duo that can be overclocked. Your previous computer has a better cpu. You can't just compare clock speeds. For the clock, a Core2duo is better than a pentium.
Greg the Pentium e5400 should be quite a bit faster then the e4400 at stock speeds (all the specs are better are they not)?
I'll also say it again, I will not be overclocking this build. So if you have a better CPU suggestion I would be interested in it based on its stock performance, not potential performance after overclocking
As far as the PSU goes, what would you suggest instead? If I extend the budget an additional $15 leaving $50 for the PSU?
Greg the Pentium e5400 should be quite a bit faster then the e4400 at stock speeds (all the specs are better are they not)?
I'll also say it again, I will not be overclocking this build. So if you have a better CPU suggestion I would be interested in it based on its stock performance, not potential performance after overclocking
As far as the PSU goes, what would you suggest instead? If I extend the budget an additional $15 leaving $50 for the PSU?
Give me about 15 - 20 min. and I'l have a build posted on here that will run that game and fits your budget.
For a flight simulator you really want to go with a quad core if you can swing it. You might be better off following knotknut's advice with the budget you have.
The review is a year old so it does not have the latest cpu and graphics cards, however it shows various video cards and processors - with some overclocks as well. What it seems to show is that, with respect to Intel processors, the speed of the processors is more important then whether it has two or four cores. Extrapolating from this, I would recommend going with a faster E7400 over a slower Q8200.
It also confirms that for FS the cpu choice is relatively more important than the GPU compared to other game choices. It appears that 9600 GT should give excellent results when paired with the faster CPU - and some are on sale now for $70. You might want to consider a GS 250 which is a little faster than all of the ones on the year old review since it is based on the 9800GTX+, although you will pay $100-130 for what might be a small advantage.
The review also shows the impact of overclocking the CPU. While I understand this does not interest you at this time, you might consider the benefits to be gained by simple OC of the FSB ratio to increase processor speed.
Finally, you did not state what resolution and AA and AF settings you wish to use, which also makes a difference.
The only system finally able to handle FSX at high settings, will involve the use of the newest i7 CPU & X58 MB.
My previous system :
E8400 dual core @ 3.0 GigHz
ATI Radeon EAH Vid Card
4 Gig DDR3 Patriot Ram 1333MHz
X48c Platinum MB..................................
The above noted system even when OC'd was barely able to run FSX at moderate settings..
The system you quoted will probably be able to run FS 2004 decently, but not FSX ....
Later...
P.S. I am actually a pilot, & for years have been trying to put a system together to run FSX at the highest settings ..Only the advent of the i7 allows for that now. I am also using 6Gig DDR3 ram & Vista 64 bit...Will be switching to Windows 7 when possible..