Hd 4850 enough for 22"?

optimus290

Distinguished
Apr 12, 2009
13
0
18,510
Hey guys! I am planning to get new pc. I am curious whether a hd 4850 will be enough for a 22" monitor for high end gaming. I don't intend to run crysis on extreme details :p
I just want to play all the latest games on 1680x1050 resolution without stutters and a smooth game play.
This is what I am thinking of,

Phenom2 x4 920 (I don't want to overclock)
asus m4a78 pro
4 gb ddr2 1066
wd 250gb
cm690
xfx hd 4850 512mb

Should I go with ddr2 or ddr3?
 

jennyh

Splendid
Looks alright to me. The value in upgrading to ddr3 over ddr2 is dubious at best, but the prices are starting to come down a lot so it might be worth considering now.
 

jassao

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2009
103
0
18,680
A 4850 will definitely run all the new games on your 22" monitor, just try to get the 1gb version if you can, it helps at higher resolutions, like yours.
I have a 4850x2 and sometimes I just disable the Crossfire so I'm actually just running 1 4850 1gb, and I can play everything at medium-high settings at 1680x1050.

 
To be honest I wouldn't put a 4850 in a new PC unless you were getting a REALLY good deal on it. It is a last gen card and is now starting to show its age a little. on a 22" I would look at something along the lines of a 5770 or better. My buddy just built an AMD machine with a 965 and just installed a 5770. It run really well at that resolution. He actually came from a 4850 and it was starting to show it's age on the newer games. I think you will find yourself upgrading in the very near future if you go with that. What options do you have? is this a pre-built or are you or someone else building this and you have any choice?
 

xc0mmiex

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2008
321
0
18,790
had one of my 4850's running a 24inch (1920*1200) and a 19inch (1440*900) at the same time without a hitch... crysis is an issue, but the rest (COD whatever, bfbc2, tf2, ) all max res, max detail, some AA AF, and it wont drop below 35's, and thats only when you join a oversize server and are in the main battle... i have a 512mb version fyi
 

gracefully

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2010
761
0
19,160
The physical size of the monitor is not relevant to the performance you will get with using a certain video card. It only provides a general idea of the resolution of your monitor.

Your 22" monitor runs at 1680x1050 natively? It's the resolution that matters to pass down judgment on GPU performance. I agree that the 4850 is probably enough for 1680x1050, but it's last year's tech. Like someone above said, get the 4850 only if you found a great bargain. Otherwise, A 5750 (which performs at par with the 4850, with decreased power consumption) would be better, and can game decently up to 1920x1200.
 

shubham1401

Distinguished
^5750 doesn't game decently upto 1920X1200.

For that recommend at least a 5770.

With the same performance, I'd say 4850 is a better deal over 5750.
Take 5770 into consideration.
 

gracefully

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2010
761
0
19,160
In my experience, it does. Among the games I've played at 19x12 with all settings maxed out are GRID, CoD4:MW, CoD:MW2, ME, Prototype, and Crysis:Warhead. Among them, only Crysis:Warhead can't run at top settings, which isn't much of a surprise, right? I could only set it to Mainstream with no AA to get 40+. If I set it to Gamer/Enthusiast I'd get 20-ish framerates at 19x12.

All the rest go from 55-80 with AA enabled.
 

shubham1401

Distinguished


But why get a 5750 when 4850 is priced at 95$ only.

Secondly, HD5770 is priced so close to 5750 which offers a good performance gain over 5750.