Cards

RNGT

Distinguished
Apr 15, 2009
1
0
18,510
Hey, I bought Call Of Duty: World At War, and it doesnt work because my graphics card is outdated. So it requires a 256MB Nvidia Geforce 6600GT or better...so if I bought a 512MB GeForce 8400GS, is that better?
 
G

Guest

Guest
no, buy something better... ati 4830 or 4850.

...assuming it's within ur budget, and your power supply can handle it.
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960
An 8400GS would run the game, but you could get something better for only a fraction more money. If you're on a low budget and have a "weaker" power supply, I'd suggest an ATI 4650 or 4670. Good lower resolution gaming performance, low cost, and low power consumption all packed into one.

Can you post some specs? Motherboard & Power Supply make/model, CPU, and what additional devices (drives, sound card, USB, etc) you're using, as well as what resolution monitor you have? It would make recommending a card that's completely compatible with your system and would compliment it well much easier.
 

rewindlabs

Distinguished
Mar 7, 2009
1,181
0
19,290

Really?

You have benchmarks to back up that claim :ange: notice i said claim ;) because it is bs...the difference isn't even noticeable...
 
G

Guest

Guest
i think some cards are maxing out pci-e 1.0 (or 1.1? i forget) now... google is ur friend of course.
 
G

Guest

Guest
err i was, but not in a mean way... sorry :S

but yea, now you can change your stance... some cards are pushing the limit of pcie 1.1
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960
We won't see any single x16 card push the limit of PCI-E 2.0 because it's actually designed to support up to x32. That's why on some motherboards you can run 2x16 in SLI and Crossfire configs.