Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > I have a 1650x1050 moniter, GTX 295?

I have a 1650x1050 moniter, GTX 295?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - I have a 1650x1050 moniter, GTX 295?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

ATM I have a 1650x1050 moniter. Is the Nvidia GTX 295 still worth it? or should I just save $190 and get the Nvidia GTX 285?

I MUST play all games out now at max settings. (exception is Crysis, I want at least 4x AA).

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Save your money and get a gtx 260, 4890,4870, or gtx 275

Reply to chef7734

Yes an overclocked 260 or 275 will work very well indeed...or 4870 and 4890....any of these cards push 1680x1050 quite nicely...they even rock 1920x1080


Message edited by rewindlabs on 04-17-2009 at 06:25:19 PM
------------------------------ http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s145/RSSRM/ay14s5-1.jpg
Reply to rewindlabs

Yeah. 260 should be fine after a slight OC. You could go 275 if you have the money.

One question: What happened to the "Create new thread" and "Create new poll" options on top the forum?


Message edited by rags_20 on 04-17-2009 at 05:23:42 PM
------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 | Thermalright Ultima 90 120mm fan | Intel DG31PR | 4 GB DDR2 @ 800MHz | HD 4850 512 GDDR3 | Corsair VX450 | Samsung 22x DVD RW | Windows Vista HP 32-bit/ Windows 7 64-bit dual boot | Samsung SyncMaster 19" LCD VGA 920NW |
Reply to rags_20

The GTX295 is NOT overkill for this resolution if you play games like crysis, STALKER Clear Sky, Cryostasis, farcry2, empire total war. But it is overkill for games like Call of Duty, left 4 dead.

Some benchmarks with GTX295:

Crisis benchmark 1920x1200 veryhigh DX10 = 40fps
Crisis benchmark 1680x1050 veryhigh DX10 = 48fps

STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1920x1200 max Setting DX10 = 25fps
STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1680x1050 max Setting DX10 = 30fps
.....


GTX275/4890 value

4870x2/GTX295 if you have the money, play some serious games, and want great frames

Reply to michaelmk86

Yes, if you want to max AA and AF on crysis, your only choice is a dual card/gpu setup even at 1680x1050. But is the game play experience that much better? And is it worth the hassle and expense of dealing with crossfire or SLI?

Reply to FredSRichardson

michaelmk86 wrote :

The GTX295 is NOT overkill for this resolution if you play games like crysis, STALKER Clear Sky, Cryostasis, farcry2, empire total war. But it is overkill for games like Call of Duty, left 4 dead.

Some benchmarks with GTX295:

Crisis benchmark 1920x1200 veryhigh DX10 = 40fps
Crisis benchmark 1680x1050 veryhigh DX10 = 48fps

STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1920x1200 max Setting DX10 = 25fps
STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1680x1050 max Setting DX10 = 30fps
.....


GTX275/4890 value

4870x2/GTX295 if you have the money, play some serious games, and want great frames



At last someone with some sense. 1680x1050 is not overkill for 295. Brilliant well done michaelmk86
. Everyone else reckons it's overkill. NO IT ISN'T

------------------------------ Core i7 920 OC 3.6Ghz
Gainward GTX295
Corsair 1000W
12Gb OCZ Reaper DDR3 1500
Reply to kkkk1

Aren't crysis and stalker both badly optimized titles though? :whistle:

------------------------------ http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s145/RSSRM/ay14s5-1.jpg
Reply to rewindlabs

rewindlabs wrote :

Aren't crysis and stalker both badly optimized titles though? :whistle:



That's the rumor, but the vast majority of people saying that have zero programming knowledge and are just repeating what they hear. I'm not saying they are optimized, but I am of the opinion that simply being demanding and having high hardware requirements does not automatically mean unoptimized. If someone has some more compelling evidence, I'd like to see it.

No, that's not a challenge for arguing, I really would like to see it. I like being edumacated =]



Anyway, while a 295 would be overkill for most people, if you play all current games at maximum settings, use lots of AA/AF, and still want a good framerate, the 295 wouldn't be a bad choice. Similar to what Michael said, just make sure the games you play can take advantage of the horsepower.

If you decide the 295 is overkill, you should look at the Radeon 4890. It's a surprisingly potent card.

Reply to efeat

Not really worth it.

The best value would defenetly be a GTX260 or GTX275. The GTX285 is the top i would buy for 1680x1050.

And this is what i have .. a GTX285 ... im playing @ 1680x1050 ....

------------------------------ __________________________Le Québécois_________________________
WCed Q9550 EO + P5Q @ 3.825ghz / HTPC - E5200 + P5Q @ 3.3ghz
BFG GTX285 OC2 + PC P&C 750w . / HIS HD4850 with Sharp 42" 1080p
Reply to boulard83

boulard83 wrote :

Not really worth it.

The best value would defenetly be a GTX260 or GTX275. The GTX285 is the top i would buy for 1680x1050.

And this is what i have .. a GTX285 ... im playing @ 1680x1050 ....



I can't say i blame you although the GTX 285 is a very enviable card. What FPS are you getting in Crysis?

(I know people bang on about Crysis but I think it's still one of the best shooters. Yes it's not greatly optimised but if I have to throw serious hardware at it to make it play I will). My i7 system is coming in 2 weeks.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 OC 3.6Ghz
Gainward GTX295
Corsair 1000W
12Gb OCZ Reaper DDR3 1500
Reply to kkkk1

michaelmk86 wrote :

The GTX295 is NOT overkill for this resolution if you play games like crysis, STALKER Clear Sky, Cryostasis, farcry2, empire total war. But it is overkill for games like Call of Duty, left 4 dead.

Some benchmarks with GTX295:

Crisis benchmark 1920x1200 veryhigh DX10 = 40fps
Crisis benchmark 1680x1050 veryhigh DX10 = 48fps

STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1920x1200 max Setting DX10 = 25fps
STALKER Clear Sky benchmark 1680x1050 max Setting DX10 = 30fps
.....


GTX275/4890 value

4870x2/GTX295 if you have the money, play some serious games, and want great frames



Would the GTX 285 be in between value and enthusiast performance? I still want play all games with max settings at 1650x1050, the only thing I ever will turn down a little is AA.

Reply to terminus

@ terminus
The GTX285 can do it ...

@ kkkk1
Didnt tryed crysis. Ill have to reinstall. Ill try it soon and leave you some feedback about it. Ill have my P5Q FSB1600 tonight. It mostly depand on if my GF let me play with my cpu ;)

ill leave some feedback about it. I think the OP need it too :D

------------------------------ __________________________Le Québécois_________________________
WCed Q9550 EO + P5Q @ 3.825ghz / HTPC - E5200 + P5Q @ 3.3ghz
BFG GTX285 OC2 + PC P&C 750w . / HIS HD4850 with Sharp 42" 1080p
Reply to boulard83
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > I have a 1650x1050 moniter, GTX 295?
Go to:

There are 500 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them