yes or no, CAN the death penalty help lower crime rates?
<b>horny bastard [-peep-</b>]
<font color=orange><b>these days every one knows how small your penis is, and they are dying to help you with many many penis enlargement emails.
Yes, make it available to more crimes too (anything with a couple decade sentence). I would also legalize <b>ALL</b> drugs.
A truly free country with harsh penalties for breaking the few laws would be my utopia.
I vote no; because if they are crazy enough to do something that needs the death sentence, I doubt he/she will care whether they live thru the consequences of their decision or not. (I'm not sure if that made sense but I can't get the right wording on what I'm trying to say.)
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=24106" target="_new"> My System Rig</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=535386" target="_new"> 3DMark03</A>
Ride along with Darnell and Tyrone:
Darnell: "That f*cking [-peep-] Jamal stole my god damn bennies. That [-peep-]'s gonna pay!"
Tyrone: "Ya, f*ck that [-peep-]! You should smoke his ass tonight."
Darnell: "The foo won't know what hit em. Call up Pookie and hook us up some AKs. We'll do this [-peep-] right."
Tyrone: "F*CK YA [-peep-]!"
Darnell: "Oh sh!t [-peep-], wait! I jus rememba'd. Those fools will give our asses the death penalty. Man, that sh!t be janky, we can't do this!"
Tyrone: "Aww f*ck man, you're right! Let's write him a note saying how he hurt our feelings stealing our bennies. That sh!t will be crazy and freak that mofo out."
____________________________________________________________
Ya right. Death penalty won't deter people from doing anything they want to do.
-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>
Wouldn't a miserable life in a tiny cell where they're only allowed out once a day be worse than dying and escaping that type of life?
So long as they don't get the lower security prisons where the're not in their own cells and they have tennis courts and pools and stuff.
Although if anyone killed a loved one of mine, I'd want them dead for sure!
<b><font color=purple>51% Angel, 49% Bitch...DON'T push it!</b>
<A HREF="http://angel.fotopic.net/" target="_new">Angel's Photo Album</A></font color=purple>
Yeah, if somebody killed my parents or something, I would find them myself and send a bullet through there brain. I am not scared to kill a person, I'm too smart to do it though. If the person does something such as killing my parents (who I love and respect them most out of anybody) they would not survive, as I know people, people who could help me. Remember, its not what you know, its who you know. Oh, and what you're packing. I want you all to know it would take an outrageous act like that described above for me to kill somebody, so I'm NOT a crazed lunitic or something, just somebody with moral values.
Little funny phrase which I read in a joke e-mail once, that holds true to this conversation:
Friends help you move, REAL friends help you move bodies.
What are we going to do tonight Brain?
The same thing we do every night Pinky; <b>Try to take over the world!</b>
3DMark score <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6607283" target="_new">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6607283</A>
It should be applied consistently where a violent crime results in loss of life. In this situation, death penalty applies, and should always apply. Once the perp has been sentenced, then an appeal should be immediately launched and all possible courses of action taken and examined within a 6 month period, thereby ensuring that the perp doesn't spend 10 years on death row. Why waste good taxpayers money?
Only when new laws are introduced acrosss the board stipulating where the death penalty applies, and is enforced 100%, will crime fall, as people see just what awaits them.
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
I voted no as you could've expected.
What is your goal with this poll? If you want to use this to support your arguments I suggest you find something better.
My CPU fan spins so fast that it creates a wormhole
Exactly what I think as well.
--
If I could see the Matrix, I'd tell you I am only seeing 0s inside your head!
no it won't, but it can empty the prisons of the life-sentence people
people don't commit crimes while they're thinking of the consequences - they never expect to get caught, or if they DO think they're gonna get caught, they don't care about the penalty period (the death sentence = THAT much worse than life in prison that it would change the person's mind? i don't think so)
<A HREF="http://www.planettribes.com/allyourbase/ayb2.swf" target="_new">411 UR 84$3 R 8310N6 2 U$</A>
If our prisons were <i>"better
"</i> life sentances would be much worse than death.
If it were all up to me there would only be three types of punishment:
<b>Fines w/parole
Deportation
Death</b> (by firing squad)
<i>*note no prisons</i>
Oh!
I heard they're looking for someone to take on the job for head of security in Argentina if you're interested?
I agree with your attitude, if not your solutions.
<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b>
Hmm, I'm guessing:
Fines w/parole for lesser crimes, I imagine (midemeanors, etc)
Death for really serious stuff? (murder)
But deportation for everything in between? To which countries would you deport that many people?
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
Anywhere from Canada to Mexico to Zimbabwe to Russia to India to Argentina to Antartica if need be.
Basically anywhere they will take 'em. It would be up to the convict and thier lawyer to find a place of refuge, delaying/stalling this process would result in fines.
So you'd expect them to call up some country and say something like, "Hey, my country is trying to get rid of me because I'm a career criminal and a menace to society. Will you take me?"
I'm sure all those countries will be really grateful for such a wonderful opportunity.
Lots of people aren't threatened by fines.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
Fines would increase exponentially, failure to pay would elevate punishment to death! So basically you better find a way to get your law breaking ass out cause you aren't going to like what happens if you stay here.
I'm sure some country would find a use for these people.
You can't deport someone from their own country of origin.
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
So you'd have the death penalty for not paying fines? A tad extreme. Rob is right, too.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 06/16/03 10:29 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Think of it as asking them to politely leave. We would not be forcing other countries to take them merely providing them the opportunity to leave the country (as a fugitive) rather than <i>"pay"</i> for their crimes with us.
You would be deported for not paying fines, if you are to be deported but cannot find a country to take refuge in and cannot pay the fines incurred from refusing to leave then you would be removed from society by being put to death.
Keep in mind they would have a fair amount of time to seek refuge (while in police custody of course).
Why not "invite" them onto a sun drenched island somewhere in the middle of the Pacific, hundreds of miles from anywhere.
And then do some nuclear weapon testing.
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
That would be cruel, the same reason why murdering 1 person and murdering 100 would have the same penalty (death).
It's cruel to arrive at the same end result by different means (ie torture, medical experimentation, etc). There is no reason be cruel and I'm a nice guy.
| Quote : Fines would increase exponentially, failure to pay would elevate punishment to death! |
Actually, you said they'd be put to death for not paying fines. Re-read your own post, if you need to.
I don't think that being vaporized in a fraction of a second from having a nuke dropped on you is cruel and unusual. Would be quicker that many, if not all, conventional methods.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
I was refering to the fines that you would get for delaying your deportation which is what I thought you were refering to when you said, "Lots of people aren't threatened by fines."
| Quote : I don't think that being vaporized in a fraction of a second from having a nuke dropped on you is cruel and unusual. Would be quicker that many, if not all, conventional methods. |
First no one can prove that being vaporized isn't the most horrible painful death possible (unless you believe in talking to dead people). Second, that would be incredibly expensive and completely unrealistic to nuke everyone to death. Third, everyone is killed the same way, this is most fair way to do it. Weather they want to be boiled to death or have sex to death (somehow), there is no choice.
That is what I was talking about. So putting people to death for not paying a stupid fine isn't cruel?
If someone detonated a nuke right on, you, you'd be history before you had a chance to register pain.
So what would be your "fair" way of killing everybody that didn't pay their fines for refusing to leave their own country?
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
I'll admit it's pretty severe/harsh but it isn't cruel, there is a difference.
Fair is giving everyone equal treatment, my method of choice would be firing squad as I mentioned before.
| Quote : Second, that would be incredibly expensive and completely unrealistic to nuke everyone to death |
Not really. You've got to ship 'em out of you're country anyway, so there's no extra cost involved in dumping them on an island in the middle of nowhere. And you've got to test nuclear weapons anyway, so again, no extra cost.
And then...
| Quote : Third, everyone is killed the same way, this is most fair way to do it. Weather they want to be boiled to death or have sex to death (somehow), there is no choice. |
Equal rights for everyone. They all die within a split second, and having studied army training vids on nuclear warfare, it is a very very quick death. You wouldn't feel it. So, in a pain sense, it would be a very humane way to day, although not exactly your conventional death sentence.
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
| Quote : You've got to ship 'em out of you're country anyway |
LoL we aren't paying for any of that! It's all on them or they can stay and die
15 vs 10... even if he wants to use it 60% pro isn't going to stand strong in an argument.
My CPU fan spins so fast that it creates a wormhole
I've got it. Freeze their bank accounts when you sentence themand then confiscate all their money and assets. You make money and, in a roundabout way, they pay for their own death. Now <i>that's</i> sensible governing!
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
That's your opinion. I'd consider it pretty damned cruel if somebody put me in front of a firing squad for not paying a fine.
You consider being instantly evaporated before having a chance to register pain as cruel, but put in front of a firing squad isn't? That's hilarious.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
All of you who voted <b>no</b> are just simply wrong.
Lets just look at the exact question:
<b>CAN</b> the death penalty <b>help</b> lower crime rates?
If the death penalty were employed for even the smallest of crimes you can't possibly say that those crime rates wouldn't lower. Think if you got caught 1mph over the speed limit they would kill you. Do you think we would have much speeders? Even if we just took 10000 <i>"innocent"</i> people and killed them surely one of them was bound to commit some sort of crime eventually, well they can't do it now, so bam lower crime!
The keyword is <b>CAN</b>. It leaves it open ended so you can say, "Yes, <b>if</b> it were like this...
So Yes of course it <b>CAN</b>. <b>Does</b> the death penalty lower crime rates? Check the statistics.
| Quote : That's your opinion. I'd consider it pretty damned cruel if somebody put me in front of a firing squad for not paying a fine. |
Well as they say, "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time."
| Quote : You consider being instantly evaporated before having a chance to register pain as cruel, but put in front of a firing squad isn't? That's hilarious. |
It's cruel because it's unfair to the people who are put to death by a different means. By giving someone a <i>"better"</i> (less painful) death than someone else you are being cruel to those who don't get killed in this manner.
You're insane.
<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=389&s=1fee5dab901bebe29da7aa1c2658fc6f" target="_new"><font color=red>dhlucke's system</font color=red></A>
<font color=blue>GOD</font color=blue> <font color=red>BLESS</font color=red> <font color=blue>AMERICA</font color=blue>
Bah, just admit you want me running your country!
Failure to pay a fine should in no way, shape, or form justify execution. If you think it does, then DH is right, and you're insane.
The fact that one method is "different" from another does not make either one cruel. Hey, I'm all for letting those on death row choose their own method, while you're insistent on having to use the same one for all. If someone chooses a certain method for their own death, who are we to argue with that? They freaking chose it themselves.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
Let me ask you this:
What would you do with criminals if you couldn't put them in prison?
A) That's <b>far</b> too vague to answer. Depends on the crime, man. The term "criminals" could mean anybody from a jaywalker to somebody that got busted for selling one ounce of weed to someone that's raped and murderd 67 people.
B) What kind of fantasy world are you talking about?
C) What's the point? We can and do put them in prison. And when a prison reaches its official "capacity", we just cram more of them in there.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
A)I'm just going to take this response as you agreeing with me.
B)Utopia
C)I believe people don't change so there is no point to wasting time and money on prisons.
Agreeing with you? As to what, exactly?
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
| Quote : Agreeing with you? As to what, exactly? |
| Quote : If it were all up to me there would only be three types of punishment:
|
I honestly don't know where you thought that I agreed with you about that. In your post above, you're saying that you think there should only be three types of punishment. I was just saying that your question was much too vague to answer. Those three examples I gave were just to illustrate the wide range of "criminals", and point out that the question you asked cannot simply be given one answer, without you getting more specific.
Put down the crack pipe, man. Seriously.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
The question was general but not vague. Here's a specific one for you:
What would you do with a repeat offender drunk driver who ran into a family of 4 (mom, dad, daughter, son) killing 2 (mom, son) and injuring the other 2 (dad, daughter) though not severely if there were no prisons?
| Quote : Put down the crack pipe, man. Seriously. |
<A HREF="http://www.angelfire.com/va/unofficialchrisshep/song22.html" target="_new">I Just Flat Out Can't Stop Smoking Crack</A>
| Quote : All of you who voted no are just simply wrong.
|
Then it is Scammy's fault for making such a broad question! It is also his fault for using STRICT YES OR NO rather than "Perhaps if..." options, because his question is definitely open ended. Ahh so you see, it isn't voters' fault here!
--
If I could see the Matrix, I'd tell you I am only seeing 0s inside your head!
Well, since you're talking about this happening in "Utopia", I wouldn't have to do anything, because it wouldn't happen; Utopia being what it is, and all.
Edit: Nice little rhyme, btw.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 06/16/03 08:25 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
| Quote : I believe people don't change so there is no point to wasting time and money on prisons |
Don't you think that you are tarring everyone with the same brush? Not everyone is a career criminal. Some do actually want to be rehabilatated.
<font color=blue>"Ah, its you. Thought I could smell cabbage" - Nigel Powers</font color=blue>
| Quote : Ride along with Darnell and Tyrone:
|
notice that only rappers talk like this
-------
<A HREF="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001355.html" target="_new">*I hate thug gangstas*</A>
Exactly.
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
| Quote : Don't you think that you are tarring everyone with the same brush? |
Of course I am, that's the only way to be fair! You want the justice system to be fair don't you?
| Quote : Some do actually want to be rehabilatated. |
And the ones who don't will say they do! There is no way to tell them appart.
Fair?!?!
Executing people because they can't pay a fine is fair?
Refusing to offer a chance for rehabilitation to those that can and want be rehabilitated simply because some can't be is fair?
<A HREF="http://www.phototalk.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=3394&ppuser=663" target="_new">My phototalk gallery</A>
<font color=blue>War</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Eagle</font color=orange>
There are 975 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

