Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Crysis DX10 Enthusiast/Very High benchmarks, links?

Crysis DX10 Enthusiast/Very High benchmarks, links?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Crysis DX10 Enthusiast/Very High benchmarks, links?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
terminus   04-20-2009 at 09:23:23 PM

I'm looking for a website with a legit benchmarks of Crysis at DX10 Enthusiast/Very High with a compiled list of ATI and Nvidia GPUs. Anyone know of one?

Preferably the tests with an Intel Core i7 and the benchmarks including newer GPUs (GTX 275, HD 4890, GTX 285, etc.)

-thanks!

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
BlueScreenDeath   04-20-2009 at 10:22:54 PM
- 0 +

Tomshardware charts

Google

------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
 Reply to BlueScreenDeath
terminus   04-20-2009 at 10:32:38 PM
- 0 +

they have a lot of cards still missing.

Reply to terminus
BlueScreenDeath   04-20-2009 at 10:46:38 PM
- 0 +

Guru 3d

http://www.guru3d.com/article/gefo [...] ew-test/14

Message quoted 1 times
------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
 Reply to BlueScreenDeath
terminus   04-20-2009 at 10:55:16 PM
- 0 +

BlueScreenDeath wrote :

Guru 3d

http://www.guru3d.com/article/gefo [...] ew-test/14



I'm not sure but I think those are on Gamer/High settings.

Reply to terminus
mindless728   04-20-2009 at 11:14:00 PM
- 0 +

well, with my desktop specs, i hit about 27 ave at 1280x1024 very high settings and 8x FSAA and 16x AF and about 16 min (Radeon 4870 1GB)

Reply to mindless728
jaguarskx   04-21-2009 at 02:33:11 AM
- 0 +

Euphoria_MK wrote :

Here is goes terminus:

http://xbitlabs.com/articles/video [...] html#sect2

http://xbitlabs.com/images/video/r [...] ysiswh.png





And here is the page which list the PC setup (Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition), driver version and where they stated:

Quote :

We selected the highest possible level of detail in each game using standard tools provided by the game itself from the gaming menu. The games configuration files weren’t modified in any way, because the ordinary user doesn’t have to know how to do it. We made a few exceptions for selected games if that was necessary. We are going to specifically dwell on each exception like that later on in our article.




http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/v [...] html#sect0

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
 Reply to jaguarskx
terminus   04-21-2009 at 03:14:11 AM
- 0 +

Very interesting, but I'm also shocked. The 4890 and 4850x2 perform better than the GTX 285...in Crysis!?!


Nearly every other benchmark I have seen, the GTX 285 has performaned better than even the 4870x2 at Crysis.

I feel something is a little :sarcastic:

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by terminus on 04-21-2009 at 03:20:36 AM
Reply to terminus
BlueScreenDeath   04-21-2009 at 03:39:46 AM
- 0 +

terminus wrote :

Very interesting, but I'm also shocked. The 4890 and 4850x2 perform better than the GTX 285...in Crysis!?!
Nearly every other benchmark I have seen, the GTX 285 has performaned better than even the 4870x2 at Crysis.
I feel something is a little :sarcastic:



Two 4870s should easily dominate a single GTX285, since two 4870s are comparable to two GTX260s.

Two 4850s or 9800GTXs should also be better than a single GTX285.

Two 4830s or two 9800GTs would perform around the same level or slightly worse than a GTX285.


The only situation where a GTX285 would perform better than 2 4850s or 2 4870s would be if Xfire wasn't enabled, and for the 4850x2 or 4870x2, if they were still using old drivers that wasn't yet supported by ATI.


Message edited by BlueScreenDeath on 04-21-2009 at 03:41:20 AM
------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
 Reply to BlueScreenDeath
terminus   04-21-2009 at 03:42:32 AM
- 0 +

true, however I always though specifically Crysis was a Nvidia optimized game.

Reply to terminus
Maziar   04-21-2009 at 07:48:56 AM
- 0 +

Well,i've played Crysis and Warhead alot and i must admit its not a very good optimize game because i have downloaded a config called CCC 2.1 for crysis and CCC 3.0 for Warhead and it makes the graphic better and u get more FPS too,i myself compared Very high quality with CCC (in both games) and the Graphic quality was better in CCC and my FPS was 15-20 more(than Default Very high)
here are some screens
System: Q6600@ 3.4,ATI HD 4870X2(Stock),4GB OCZ DDR2 800 RAM + Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1

Crysis 1920x1200 + CCC 2.1 LVL5:

Level Rescue:
http://xs138.xs.to/xs138/09172/ccc_best575.jpg.xs.jpg

http://xs138.xs.to/xs138/09172/crysis64_2009-03-21_13-48-23-77808.jpg.xs.jpg

Custom map(GDC 06):
http://xs138.xs.to/xs138/09172/crysis64_2009-04-17_12-53-47-28286.jpg.xs.jpg

http://xs138.xs.to/xs138/09172/crysis64_2009-04-16_17-15-57-12943.jpg.xs.jpg


Message edited by Maziar on 04-21-2009 at 07:51:41 AM
Reply to Maziar
dingumf   05-17-2009 at 04:00:42 AM
- 0 +

I'm not upgrading till there's a card that can run Crysis on Enthusiast.

I AM NOT SATISFIED NVIDIA/ATI

YOUR NEXT LINE BETTER BLOW CRYSIS OUT OF THE WATER OR IM STICKING TO CONSOLE GAMING!!!

Reply to dingumf
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Crysis DX10 Enthusiast/Very High benchmarks, links?
Go to:

There are 733 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.580 seconds
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them