[Solved] GA-MA770-UD3 Phenom II 940 Bios question

Having a little trouble, installed a Phenom II 940 in my GA-MA770-UD3 and Flashed to the F4 bios per the manufacture recommendations, problem is this bios doesnt recognize the processor, it refers to it as "AMD processor unknown, agena core, 65nm" I know the board supports the chip, are there any other MA770-UD3 users out there that have found the website is incorrect in their recommendations of bios, if so what is everyone else using and is it working better then the F4?

Please dont take my questioning the wrong way as my respect for your knowledge increases every time you post an answer to a question of mine, which has been pretty frequent recently but isnt there an element of concern when it comes to flashing the correct/incorrect bios? If it doesn't work/is not correct wouldn't that "brick" my motherboard so to speak?

Yeah, I will stick with Bios flashing from outside the OS myself, I dont trust the stability of windows at the best of times, certainly not during something touchy like that. Same reason I refuse to use the Overdrive or even my mobo's built in "Easy Tune" to OC, just not something I want to leave up to a loose collection of low flying contradictory code. I will give the F5 Bios a shot, its actually what I had right before because of the Kuma core I had in before, if that doesn't work I will move successively up the list. Thanks again for all your help.

Its actually a variation on a saying from one of my model airplane mentors, something to say about a kit that isn't quite up to par. "That Revell 1/48 P-61 Black Widow isnt so much a model as a loose collection of low flying parts". Just to make everyone aware, heard back from Gigiabyte this afternoon and was made aware THE CORRECT BIOS FOR THE PHENOM II 940 ON THE GA-MA770-UD3 IS THE F8 BIOS. Why that isnt up on their website I dont know, but hopefully now anyone running into the issue will be able to find the right answer here on toms...where the right answer ends up being most of the times anyway. Thanks for being right bilbat...again

Ya know - you'd think that, compared to the effort to actually 'patch' a BIOS, adding three cogent lines to a changelog wouldn't be a big deal - but it certainly always seems to BE! That's one reason, when there's a choice available, I usually pick 'open source' solutions - take a peek here:
http://www.openmedialibrary.org/
Now that's a changelog! Why can't any manufacturers seem to manage this process coherently?