Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Gigabyte > Gigabyte vs Intel Sata Controllers
Word :    Username :           
 

Reading the manual of my (yet to arrive) ga-p55m-ud2, I see sata ports (2) dedicated to a Gigabye controller, and other Sata dedicated to an Intel controller (7, I think).

The manual is quite specific how to enable either and use either set for raid, but nothing indicates the reason one would have two different controllers.

What's the point? Anyone know?

I plan to boot from a standalone drive, have a second standalone drive as a scratch storage, and finally have two additional drives in raid 1 for work storage.

Would there be any logic that would drive me to use one or the other controllers for the raid? or the boot?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Best,
Bob

System in transit:
i7 860 on Gigabyte ga-p55m-ud2; 4x2 mb G.Skill ddr3-1600

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Often these extra ports come "free" with the chip that supports IDE disks, or some other function on the board.

Normally, place all your HDs on the Intel ports. The "Gigabyte" ports usually are lower performance.


Message edited by Twoboxer on 09-23-2009 at 02:22:01 AM
Reply to Twoboxer

Twoboxer is right - don't use your GSATAs (typically, jMicron JMBX36xx chips) until you've 'run out' of Intel ports; the Intels are 10% faster in normal use, 12-18% faster in RAID, the firmware is better, the automatic monotoring/repair software is infinitely better and more robust - an all-around better deal! The jMicrons are a good place to park a SATA DVD, if you're using one...

Reply to bilbat
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Motherboards & Memory > Gigabyte > Gigabyte vs Intel Sata Controllers
Go to:

There are 1100 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them