cigarjohn said:
So this garbage collecting program including on the Raid Controller cards, is it the same as Trim and will it keep the SSD's running at full performance like Trim? And if I do use the Raid cards garbage collector, can I also use Raid on the SSD's?
Peace.
Garbage collection is an internal process done by the SSD's own controller, and is entirely OS- and SATA/RAID controller-independent. The only requirement is power and no disk activity for a period of time.
cigarjohn said:
From Tom's Hardware Articles, I was looking at the Crucial C300 series of SSD's. If I could Raid them with no problems and no performance hits, I would purchase either (3) 40's or (2) 64's. If Raid is a problem then I will just purchase (1) 128. These would be used as my system drive.
Then if Raid wasn't a problem with the SSD's, I would also invest in purchasing either (4) more 128's or (2) 256's and use in a Raid 0 for my secondary drives for games and video editing software or (2) VelociRaptors 600gb 10k's also in a Raid 0.
And I will be useing external backup in case of system problems.
Peace.
The C300 has a very poor garbage collection implementation. It's incredibly slow and not very effective. Add on the fact that the drives simply aren't as robust as Sandforce ones as far as being able to handle a lot of usage without losing too much performance and you've got a pretty poor performer without TRIM to help out. But even TRIM is only useful if you actually delete data regularly rather than simply overwriting it.
Out of curiosity, what do you need RAID performance for? A single SSD is very fast, and I can't imagine you'd want to spend money on RAID just for normal desktop usage.