Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Heaven Benchmarks 2.1

Last response: in Overclocking
Share
December 28, 2010 12:56:55 AM

Not sure if this is the right place, but I thought I would ask

Does this Benchmark score look a bit low or on the odd side? I am kind of skeptical of it
Thoughts?

Thank you very much

More about : heaven benchmarks

a c 197 K Overclocking
December 29, 2010 8:37:16 PM

Never heard of Heaven Benchmarks. Whether your numbers are good or bad depends on how your system compares to others using the same benchmarks.
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 9:14:22 AM

Hi.
I wanted to give you a bit of a reference point so I downloaded and benchmarked my computer. I assumed you had run just with default settings but now I've looked again I can see you didn't. I had to share my results though because look at my score!! PERFECT SCORE lmao.



I'll re-bench now matching your settings as close as I can to see what results I get.
m
0
l
Related resources
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 9:33:16 AM

I can't run tessellation due to having older graphics cards, so probably an unfair result to compare to.. anyway.. here is mine with all settings the same (that I can actually set).

m
0
l
a c 125 K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 12:14:51 PM

Your score seems fine if your GTX580 is at stock.

Here's what I got with the same settings with a GTX570 @ 930/1860/2200 and a Core i7 920 @ 4.3Ghz (CPU speed doesn't seem to effect this benchmark much)

m
0
l
January 14, 2011 6:40:04 PM

Why won't my image display?
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 6:48:22 PM

solidliquid said:
Why won't my image display?


Because you just posted a link to it..

You need to wrap the link in [ img ] tags.
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 6:51:18 PM

acer0169 said:
Because you just posted a link to it..

You need to wrap the link in [ img ] tags.


I already tried that and went back and changed it to URL from IMG.

I will do another IMG below and show you what I mean...

m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 6:54:24 PM



is what you're meant to link to.. imageshake.us shows an address ending in .jpg but it's actually a URL. To do this in future, right click the image and copy the image path.
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 6:57:21 PM

I don't see an image in your post above. Do you see one? Hmmm.... wonder what is going on here.
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 6:57:41 PM

oh wait, now I do. Weird!
m
0
l
a c 125 K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 7:02:37 PM

You do realise there's a place to test posts right?

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/forum-45-46.html

Anyway I think the OP was looking to find out if his heaven 2.1 score was as it should be, Cinebench CPU test doesn't really have anything to do with heaven 2.1.... Good score though
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 7:03:12 PM

thanks man, it worked!
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 7:05:45 PM

Rustyy117 said:
You do realise there's a place to test posts right?


Yes, but I was using the IMG button, and it was not working. And, as it was pointed out, it was some weird thing with the URL returned by ImageShack. When I copied/pasted the URL they furnished, the IMG tool here showed the text and not the image. When I did right click on the image, as he suggested, it did embed a URL that did work with the IMG thingee on here.

:) 
m
0
l
a c 125 K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 7:09:42 PM

Yeah thats great and im glad you have it working, but try not to ask questions that aren't related to the thread in any way, you may de-rail the thread..
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 7:12:39 PM

OMG is right. Solid if you want to talk about Cinebench then find the cinebench thread or start a new one if there isn't one. For now.. download and benchmark in Heaven and post your results.
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 7:47:01 PM

Sorry, was just trying to provide some "common ground" since it did not appear that people were aware of "heaven", and I wanted to see their CineBench scores so I could compare them to mine.

This is a work machine and I cannot install anything on it that is not on there already.
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 8:00:20 PM

CineBench doesn't add any common ground to a thread called "Heaven Benchmarks" ¬_¬.
m
0
l
January 14, 2011 9:28:15 PM

Yes, but my point was...

1. I can't install Heaven
2. I did have Cinebench
3. Other people might also have Cinebench.
4. Those subset of (3) who could also run the benchmark in (1) might post their Cinebench score, from which I could interpolate a candidate score my system might get in Heaven.

:) 
m
0
l
a c 125 K Overclocking
January 14, 2011 9:34:19 PM

Cinebench CPU score will in no way indicate accurately what score your PC would get in Heaven 2.1

Cinebench is extremely CPU intensive, Unigene Heaven is extremely GPU intensive, they were made to test different componenets of a PC...

You may have Cinebench and so may other's, Some people may also have trouble installing Heaven, but thats still not a reason to post Cinebench results in a Heaven 2.1 thread..

As acer has already mentioned, if you want to show your cinebench results or see other people's results then create your own thread.
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 15, 2011 9:17:13 AM

solidliquid said:
Yes, but my point was...

1. I can't install Heaven

Then don't comment on the thread.
solidliquid said:

2. I did have Cinebench

..so do I.. relevant.
solidliquid said:

3. Other people might also have Cinebench.

Other people DO use Cinebench.
solidliquid said:

4. Those subset of (3) who could also run the benchmark in (1) might post their Cinebench score, from which I could interpolate a candidate score my system might get in Heaven.

CineBench and Heaven are two completely different benchmarks. There's almost no way you'd be able to get a Heaven score guess from what someone else got in Cinebench.

*sigh*.
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 15, 2011 9:19:12 AM

Talk about de-rail.

Anyone else using Heaven that can set us back on track!? ;) .

I might benchmark my old computer a little later today to see how it compares to todays machines. It's like 4-5 years old now, AMD X2 3.0GHz with SLI 8600GTS (could never efford the 8800!!).
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
January 15, 2011 11:53:42 AM



Here's the benchmark from my old computer, now called the "facebook" machine as that's all it's used for lol. AMD Athlon 5600+ 3GHz, 8600GTS SLI.
m
0
l

Best solution

January 15, 2011 4:50:00 PM

All these results being posted without tesselation doesn't count for anything when comparing, because running in dx10/ with tesselation off yields scores significantly higher.

Also here is how i bench it normally:



But when I up AA from 0x to 2x and then up Tess from NORMAL to EXTREME here is what I get:


Which is about 68% of the speed of your GTX 480

Now considering that mine is heavily overclocked 919MHz/1838MHz/3980MHz it sounds about right. GTX 460 SLI is a little faster than GTX 580 on average**. And hte performance gain of GTX 460 SLI is supposed to be nearly 90% or thereabouts on average**. So stock GTX 460 should be close to half the speed of GTX 580.

So I have to agree with OMFGWTFBBQ... If your GTX 580 is stock or only slightly overclocked then the results seem to agree.


_________________
** Not sure about the exact scaling on Heaven, but IIRC those are the average figures from some benchmarks I've seen.
Share
a b K Overclocking
January 15, 2011 5:04:33 PM

If the 460 is anything like the 260s then yes, the scaling is right up in the 90% range. On Crysis, SLI litterally doubles my FPS which I was amazed at, though on GTA I only get around 75% increase.
m
0
l
June 20, 2011 12:46:52 AM

Best answer selected by Chilledchaos.
m
0
l
May 9, 2012 10:12:44 AM

Hey guys, Can someone help me with the benchmark settings, I think I haven them incorrect, My fps looks to high lol


m
0
l
May 9, 2012 10:24:26 AM

I re-did the test with all high settings, is this accurate?


m
0
l
!