Ok so I am planning to get a new Core 2 Quad CPU and motherboard and I was wondering how big the performance difference is between a 8mb L2 and 12mb L2 running at the same clock speed and bus speed?
hey noob next time read the title he didnt ask what AMD chip to get, fanboy.
as far as my knowledge goes the bigger cache the more improvement you will see in heavy applications such as rendering and intense games. think of it this way, do you think there is a big difference between 4 vs. 8 instead? i'm inclined to say yes. higher cache you will notice a difference for sure.
------------------------------E8500 oc'd 4.5 @ 1.44 vcore with 92mm Zalman
ATI 4850 oc'd 680/1158 with aftermarket Zalman
Asus P5Q Pro mobo
2 gigs 800 Corsair ram @ 4-4-4-12
Reply to werxen
It depends on the program, but in most cases, there won't be much of a difference. IIRC though, all 8MB cache Core 2 quads are 65nm, while 12MB are 45nm. The 45nm will run cooler and use less power (and overclock better).
------------------------------Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl
Ok so I am planning to get a new Core 2 Quad CPU and motherboard and I was wondering how big the performance difference is between a 8mb L2 and 12mb L2 running at the same clock speed and bus speed?
It depends on the memory access pattern of the programs you're running, but generally yes - the larger the cache the better the performance. But there are diminishing returns. For example (and these are entirely numbers I'm making up myself) it may be that with 4MB of cache you get a 90% hit rate, and with 8MB of cache you get a 95% hit rate, and with 12MB of cache you get a 97% hit rate. So you get less improvement with each increment of cache.
hey noob next time read the title he didnt ask what AMD chip to get, fanboy.
I just want him to get the most value for money. If he's getting a new mobo, a Phenom II will perform better at lower prices.
There's no need to be agressive.
It's not like he was asking for i7 advice and I suggested the Phenom II.
It's just that it makes sense to choose AM3 with bettter a upgrade path than the dead 775, and superior performance at the same price of a Core 2 Quad system.
How much cache is needed is also determined by the clock speed, Just say your running both quads at 2GHz there will be very little difference between 8mb and 12mb. As you increase the speed to 3GHz the gap will widen(but still may be small) and the difference will carry on getting bigger at higher clock speeds.
@daship, the 'above 6MB cache makes no difference' argument only applies to the phenom II's, because it has 2MB L2 cache and 6MB L3 cache. However if it has a smaller L2 cache then you need a bigger L3 cache. Hence why the i7's have 8MB L3 cache, although Intel could have increased performance by a severe margin by doubling the L1 and L2 cache on the i7's.