Why would anyone even question it. its like getting free candy and asking why.....
Can't wait till Core i5. If they do have it set the way I hear then a quad with the next SMT will have 4 threads per core. Can't wait till those same questions come up again.
I wouldn't mind a free Core i7. I would OC it to 3.6GHz maybe 3.8, give it a nice high end Asus mobo, feed it 18GB of DDR3, give it dual HD4890X2s to push and probably have 3 1.5TB HDDs in a RAID0 for it to store on.
All topped off with a nice airflow friendly full sized ATX Thermaltake Xaser VI case.
Hey, maybe the OP just wants a cool computer but doesent spend his whole life on the computer looking op geek stuff like we do. Kinda harsh on OP guys...
Not like it couldn't be an OEM box, and he simply didn't know.
------------------------------Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground, or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group.
Reply to Scotteq
It is a 4 core computer with Hyperthreading technology. Due to that the computer Identifies 2 processors for every core on the computer. It is normal, however having that feature enabled can detriment the computers performance for non-multithreaded applications.
That's why I said logical and not physical cores. I was being deliberately vague which means my comment could probably be picked apart for some obscure inaccuracy.
It is a 4 core computer with Hyperthreading technology. Due to that the computer Identifies 2 processors for every core on the computer. It is normal, however having that feature enabled can detriment the computers performance for non-multithreaded applications.
not specifically Hyperthreading. Yes its same in essence but it is better. In fact the performance loss has been shown to be minimal compared to the old HT that would cause some pretty big performance loss in a wide array of apps.
But in the current software state, almost everything supports some sort of multithreading and even games are catching up and by the time a Core i7 becomes obsolete (say 2012, end of the world and all) every program will use at least 4+ cores.
It is a new incarnation of hyperthreading nonetheless. And for purely older single threaded applications it can cause slower performance, though the chance is lessened greatly with the newest use of the technology.
Hyperthreading buddy , and btw you guys are too harsh on the op, he was just trying to get some help, but i do agree he could of have easily googled it.