Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Monitors: 1920x1200 vs. 1920x1080
Word :    Username :           
 

What should I be considering when buying a 24" LCD Monitor and trying to decide between a monitor that has 1920x1200 vs. 1920x1080 (HD, 16:9)?

Note that my current video card max res is 1280x1024.

Thanks for the help!

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Is this a serious question or am i missing something here?

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger
- 0 +

it is a serious question and we are all missing something. wtf.

------------------------------ E8500 oc'd 4.5 @ 1.44 vcore with 92mm Zalman
ATI 4850 oc'd 680/1158 with aftermarket Zalman
Asus P5Q Pro mobo
2 gigs 800 Corsair ram @ 4-4-4-12
Reply to werxen
- 0 +

I believe the number you are saying is the max resolution of your current monitor, not the gfx card. You may want to post the type of gfx card you have to know if can support a 24" display.

Regarding the resolutions on the 24" monitors, 1920x1080 is meant for movie watching primarily, you can game on it just fine, its just made to fit true hd specs. So if you plan to watch a lot of movies go for that one.

Reply to tonyn84

If I was buying a 24 inch monitor I'd want 1920 x 1200 . The extra height is really useful with almost all productivity apps .
I dont care if theres a small black band top and bottom of the screen when I am watching a movie .


Your video cards driver is reporting a max resolution of 1280 x 1024 because thats the limit of your current screen . Wuith a higher resolution screen it will offer the correct resolution .

Be aware that 3d games need much more powerful gfx cards to run at higher resolutions . Your hardware might not be enough for smooth game play at 1920 x 1200 .

Reply to Outlander_04

Go for a 1900x1200, if you use multimedia apps the extra height is really useful. Make sure it supports 1:1 pixel mapping.

Reply to NatteDraak

+1 for Outlander. It really does help with usability.

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793

@stragestranger & @werxen: Your replies were completely non-value-add. Not sure why u ever bothered to post. Apparently u aren't perceptive enough to gather that I was lacking some understanding, and hence was asking a question, and was not even sure how to ask it. U 2 r brilliant.

Thanks to all the others that replied, your responses were helpful, I appreciate it!

Reply to silentnoiz

Well sorry, but what is there to know, one is 16:9 format, which you apparently knew, the other is 16:10. You gain a few pixels top and bottom, what was there to ask about.

There is nothing major being asked or answered in this thread.

Oh and U2 are an o.k band i suppose.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Monitors: 1920x1200 vs. 1920x1080
Go to:

There are 650 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them