Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Bus Width Vs Frequency Vs Memory

Bus Width Vs Frequency Vs Memory

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Bus Width Vs Frequency Vs Memory

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hi All,
I am a first time buyer of graphics card. I have made up my mind on 4770 Sapphire reference card. Comparing the specs of 4770 Vs 4850 how much will bus width matter. I mean to ask does bus width help higher resolution or higher settings (as in high details Vs Medium details OR no AA vs 4xAA).

Thanks
Santosh

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Bus width doesnt matter on its own.

Bandwidth is a product of memory speed and bus width. DDR5 memory is quad pumped, ie bandwitch is frequency*bus*4. DDR3 is double.

A 4850 and 4770 use different types of memory. the 4770 uses quad pumped GDDR5, the 4850 only GDDR3. The 4850 has double the bus width.. but the same effective memory transfer rate.

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

Performance wise they are very similar but the 4770 uses less power and is newer tec, thats why i would pick it over a 4850.

Mactronix

Reply to mactronix

Thanks Daedalus685 and mactronix

Reply to santoshnavale

It depends really, although in general performance, its a push.

A higher Bus width allows for the transfer of more data per LOAD operation. In theory, a 256-bit GPU can access 4x as much data as a 64-bit CPU in a single LOAD operation (hence, why CPU's tend to be clocked higher, to allow for more LOAD operations to compensate for a small data bus).

Provided the GPU can execute all its data in a single cycle, the higher bus width would clearly be faster. Of course, that almost never happens, so most of the data needs to be stored in RAM, where faster RAM speeds then start to close the distance.

Hence theres almost no diffrence between the two approaches, at least in current applications. I suspect that purley mathematical functions, as opposed to rendering, would run much faster on a wider bus though (maybe the reason ATI refuses to implement Physx? Because NVIDIA's larger Bus would be too big an advantage in benchies? )

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/622598.png
Reply to gamerk316
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Bus Width Vs Frequency Vs Memory
Go to:

There are 1061 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them