I'm running mostly Adobe softwares & some gaming in between. I'm thinking either a 6GB Corsair Dominator or OCz Platinum. I most likely won't be doing any OC...since I'm not really good at those kind of stuff. Corsair costs $50 more...is it worth the price? Or if you have any other suggestion please let me know. Thanks in advance!
Message edited by jakes69 on 10-07-2009 at 08:45:21 PM
both are good chip companies w/ great products
Dominator is product line, w/ multiple chips under that name
Just remember to look for lowest latency. The lower the better, but i wouldn't pay an exorbitant amount of money for a small gain in memory performance
When you compare #1 and #2, both are name brands that guarantee performance at the same rated speed, voltage, and timings. #2 is $78 cheaper, so if you aren't overclocking that's the one to buy. If you are overclocking, you may believe (or may find proof in reviews) that the Corsair will overclock faster and easier.
#3 is guaranteed to run at the same speed and voltage, but at faster timings. Importantly, with only 7 latency (the first "7" in the 7-7-7-24 string). So this memory only requires 7/8ths as long a delay between "accesses" as #1 or #2.
Of these, #3 is the best memory for a non-overclocker. It may also prove to overclock as well or better than the Corsair, but none of that is known or guaranteed by the specs.
#3 will benchmark faster, help overall system performance by a few percent, but frankly that probably won't really be noticable in day to day use.