Ok so, as I start this i don't want to start a flame thread or any kind of fanboy crap or anything of the sort, i'm just looking for some advise from people who are hopefully smarter than I am.
So, with the above in mind...
If I am running an AMD processor (at the moment AM2, but in the future AM3) would it be within my best interest to pair that processor with an ATI card?
Now, I have always used Nvidia, not because i'm a specific fan of them, but because they are what was used in my first PC's built by other people in the past and they worked great.r
From what i've read, i think Win 7 will have it's own crossing of GPU and CPU for tasks, so i don't need to specifically rely on ATI or Nvida to do it for me.
Cost is not an issue here, i just want a generic, YES i should pair AMD with ATI or NO it doesn't matter.
I suppose I should include in here that mainly what i do with the machine is gaming, some programing, some website stuff, and a little CADD or Rhino (obviously the video card is a mute point with programing and websites, but you get the idea) so again, 95% game, and game hard.
Ok... there is one, tiny difference. With an AMD CPU, AMD chipset, and an ATI GPU, you can use their nifty little Fusion program, which will shut down some minor tasks (like instant messengers) for you, giving you slightly better performance if you want to use it..... or you can just shut down those kinds of things yourself.
the only thing i could think of is that if you are using an AMD processor, then you should probably use an ATI card and AMD chipset if you plan on Crossfire, since Ive heard that nvidia chipsets for AMD arent the best. If you go with the x58 from Intel, that would give you both crossfire and SLI.
If you are planning on crossfire or SLI, and are using an AMD processor, I would recommend an AMD chipset with ATI graphics cards.
If you are not, then it really doesnt matter what card you use, since you can use either card in either chipset.
------------------------------I couldn't overclock my 6000+ so I undervolted it. Stable at 3.0 GHz and 1.05V
Reply to the last resort
Well I would have to say yes, there are reasons to go all AMD/ATI.
It is nothing that would stop me from using nvid if I could get a better deal, but advantages none the less.
1. Fusion does work. It isn't the 2nd coming but it does help (if you us older hardware like I do, probably more so, see reason #2 )
2. The support. By being able to have one place for support that can go over the entire "platform" it simplifies and speeds things up.
ex.
About a month ago I had a problem with my moldy oldie gaming rig (socket 939 Ath 3500+, on a crossfire 200 NB with a pair of x1600 pros in crossfire)
My crossfire stopped working so for giggles I start a problem ticket on the AMD website. I figured hey it is all 4yr old hardware, no way they will help I'l get the canned Out of Warranty response.
surprise , surprise
I had a week long email exchange w/ 3 different levels of customer support.
sure it did come down to your stuff is old and broke and that is why you can't crossfire anymore but they had me pulling info and testing every part of the platform.
Thank you to everyone who posted, i appreciate it!
The replies were about what i figured, i didn't think it would make a difference, but t0r012, you bring up a good point with the support side of things.
I'm relatively unfamiliar with ATI, so i guess i should study up. The only thing i really know about em is that the 4770's kick butt in pairs for the price!
I was considering a GTX260, so i would suppose it's ATI counter-part would be the 4870..or..the 4850..?
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.