System Builder Marathon, June 2010: $2,000 Performance PC
Tags:
- Hardware
- Performance
- System Builder
- Product
Last response: in Reviews comments
Crashman
June 15, 2010 6:00:09 AM
Tom’s Hardware takes a more frugal approach this month, with a high-end PC that fits within the budget of most folks who call themselves power users. Will recent advances in hardware allow this $2,000 build to beat our $3,000 system from March?
System Builder Marathon, June 2010: $2,000 Performance PC : Read more
System Builder Marathon, June 2010: $2,000 Performance PC : Read more
More about : system builder marathon june 2010 000 performance
gkay09
June 15, 2010 6:20:19 AM
Aatish
June 15, 2010 6:57:52 AM
Related resources
- Looking at System Builder Marathon (or any other PC) for New Build - Forum
- Help! System Builder Marathon, Q2 2014: Our Budget Gaming PC - Forum
- System Builder Marathon: Price/Performance - Forum
- System Builder Marathon: Price/Performance - Forum
- System Builder Marathon, August 2012: $1000 Enthusiast PC - Forum
frye
June 15, 2010 7:05:58 AM
TomD_1
June 15, 2010 7:11:44 AM
Flamango
June 15, 2010 7:14:18 AM
Relayer
June 15, 2010 7:51:23 AM
a4mula
June 15, 2010 7:54:51 AM
Can't say I agree with much here. You pick up a budget case that's going to restrict airflow due to lack of wire management, and then drop 75 on a cooler. Megahalems are spectacular, I own one myself but you've defeated any gain by placing it in a subpar enclosure. Should have just went with a 902 and a CM 212+. Would have been cheaper and less restrictive.
I still fail to see the love of 1366 in these builds where there is no intention of upgrading to hexacore. Save the $100 and do a p55 i7-860 build. You're going to get performance that rivals the 930 on every benchmark including those that take x8/x8 into consideration. You'll surpass the 930 in a few.
700 for dual 470s when you can get dual 5850s for 560.
PSU that is being heavily overtaxed. You're risking the entire 2k machine by running 100w over the psus rated value. The only thing keeping this machine running is the fact that Silverstone makes high quality parts and you have a single rail. Had this of been a multi-rail you would have been pulling out a gpu, scaling back your overclocks, or buying a new psu. At some point you have to wonder if this is a safety hazard.
Sorry Thomas, just not feeling this build at all. I see about $400 of budget that could have easily have been trimmed and would have been within a few percentage points of the current build. This could have gone towards anything from your much wanted redundant storage to SSD drives.
I still fail to see the love of 1366 in these builds where there is no intention of upgrading to hexacore. Save the $100 and do a p55 i7-860 build. You're going to get performance that rivals the 930 on every benchmark including those that take x8/x8 into consideration. You'll surpass the 930 in a few.
700 for dual 470s when you can get dual 5850s for 560.
PSU that is being heavily overtaxed. You're risking the entire 2k machine by running 100w over the psus rated value. The only thing keeping this machine running is the fact that Silverstone makes high quality parts and you have a single rail. Had this of been a multi-rail you would have been pulling out a gpu, scaling back your overclocks, or buying a new psu. At some point you have to wonder if this is a safety hazard.
Sorry Thomas, just not feeling this build at all. I see about $400 of budget that could have easily have been trimmed and would have been within a few percentage points of the current build. This could have gone towards anything from your much wanted redundant storage to SSD drives.
Score
4
madass
June 15, 2010 8:07:51 AM
madass
June 15, 2010 8:10:38 AM
IMO they should have taken an i5 750 (USD80 saved) and 4GB of CL7 1066-no game out there uses more than 2GB, more than 4GB is a waste(at least another USD40 saved). P55 mobo with 2x x8= USD 120. 80 saved. Total: USD200. Dual 5870's anyone? Don't forget- the 5970 has a lot of problems with CFire scaling- even a pair of 5850's can beat it in most cases, especially at 2560-blame crappy ATI drivers.......
Score
-4
Crashman
June 15, 2010 8:40:19 AM
RelayerNeed a bigger PSU. Why are you using the one you did? You have the funds to buy one that will drive this system properly.
Nobody thought it would draw more than 750W peak load. Even so, the article has been revised to show that the actual power output was only 660W to 680W, well below the unit's limits.a4mulaCan't say I agree with much here. You pick up a budget case that's going to restrict airflow due to lack of wire management, and then drop 75 on a cooler. Megahalems are spectacular, I own one myself but you've defeated any gain by placing it in a subpar enclosure. Should have just went with a 902 and a CM 212+. Would have been cheaper and less restrictive.I still fail to see the love of 1366 in these builds where there is no intention of upgrading to hexacore. Save the $100 and do a p55 i7-860 build. You're going to get performance that rivals the 930 on every benchmark including those that take x8/x8 into consideration. You'll surpass the 930 in a few.I'm not seeing the point of the Blueray drive. If this was a bare bones value to performance build it sticks out like a sore thumb. 700 for dual 470s when you can get dual 5850s for 560. Sorry Thomas, just not feeling this build at all. I see about $400 of budget that could have easily have been trimmed and would have been within a few percentage points of the current build. This could have gone towards anything from your much wanted redundant storage to SSD drives.
It's OK a4mula, but you're completely wrong.1.) The air temperature in the case was excellent. Tom's has tested enough cases to know that smaller models that fit tightly around the CPU cooler do an excellent job of cooling the CPU area, so long as the rear fan is fast enough.
2.) Tom's tested the 212+, and it's only fair (not great). This months build was expected to reach high overclocks.
3.) Tom's has also done an i7-860 build around six months ago, that CPU was one of the worst-overclocking i7's Tom's has ever used. Subtract around 4-8% in game performance for using x8 slots, and the value evaporates.
4.) Would you build a $1000 machine that can't run DVD's? Then why would you build a $2000 machine that can't play BRD's? BRD's are close enough to mainstream that not having the capability should be the thing that "sticks out" IMO, but you do make a decent argument since this pick was based on an opinion.
5.) Yeh, you saw how dual 470's smashed the performance of dual 5870's? Oh, that was a 5970...well there you go. 470's take the big win.
So a4mula, points 1-3 and 5 are purely factual and based on testing. You might be able to win the opinion-based argument on #4, but whoever gave you the thumbs-up was also wrong so don't let popularity mislead you.
Score
11
a4mula
June 15, 2010 9:07:20 AM
Crashman said:
Nobody thought it would draw more than 750W peak load. If anyone involved with the project had known this, a larger unit would have been purchased.It's OK a4mula, but you're completely wrong.1.) The air temperature in the case was excellent. Tom's has tested enough cases to know that smaller models that fit tightly around the CPU cooler do an excellent job of cooling the CPU area, so long as the rear fan is fast enough.
2.) Tom's tested the 212+, and it's only fair (not great). This months build was expected to reach high overclocks.
3.) Tom's has also done an i7-860 build around six months ago, that CPU was one of the worst-overclocking i7's Tom's has ever used. Subtract around 5-8% in game performance for using x8 slots, and the value evaporates.
4.) Would you build a $1000 machine that can't run DVD's? Then why would you build a $2000 machine that can't play BRD's? BRD's are close enough to mainstream that not having the capability should be the thing that "sticks out" IMO, but you do make a decent argument since this pick was based on an opinion.
5.) Yeh, you saw how dual 470's smashed the performance of dual 5870's? Oh, that was a 5970...well there you go. 470's take the big win.
So a4mula, points 1-3 and 5 are purely factual and based on testing. You might be able to win the opinion-based argument on #4, but whoever gave you the thumbs-up was also wrong so don't let popularity mislead you.
1) 21.6, 69.5!, 43.6, 69.9! Above Ambient? These are Excellent case temperatures? What are you used to using as a case, hell?
2) 212+ Has been tested by multiple sources and it's consistently scored high across the board, matching and exceeding the TRUE in many comparisons.
3) Lol, I find that humorous as the 860 is almost a consistently higher overclocker than the D0 920/930 and destroys the older C0. You may have been unfortunate with a bad binning, but any amount of time looking into the 860 and the p55 with it's lack of northbridge shows how strongly these chips perform. As far as your 5-8pct numbers for x8/x8 you're grossly misrepresenting the results. It came out to an average of 3pct.
5) Sorry 5970 doesn't equal dual 5780's, nor does it equal dual 5850s even though it's clocked as such. Perhaps you haven't heard but crossfireX has a pretty major issue with memory management, and thus with scalability.
I could care less about popularity. You put together a ragtag rig that I wouldn't trust to my worst enemy let alone to a follower of Tom's. You lacked focus, foresight, and worst of all you did it with no apologies.
Score
10
Crashman
June 15, 2010 9:36:36 AM
a4mula said:
1) 21.6, 69.5!, 43.6, 69.9! Above Ambient? These are Excellent case temperatures? What are you used to using as a case, hell?a4mula said:
2) 212+ Has been tested by multiple sources and it's consistently scored high across the board, matching and exceeding the TRUE in many comparisons.a4mula said:
3) Lol, I find that humorous as the 860 is almost a consistently higher overclocker than the D0 920/930 and destroys the older C0. You may have been unfortunate with a bad binning, but any amount of time looking into the 860 and the p55 with it's lack of northbridge shows how strongly these chips perform. As far as your 4-8pct numbers for x8/x8 you're grossly misrepresenting the results. It came out to an average of 3pct.a4mula said:
5) Sorry 5970 doesn't equal dual 5780's, nor does it equal dual 5850s even though it's clocked as such. Perhaps you haven't heard but crossfireX has a pretty major issue with memory management, and thus with scalability.a4mula said:
I could care less about popularity. You put together a ragtag rig that I wouldn't trust to my worst enemy let alone to a follower of Tom's. You lacked focus, foresight, and worst of all you did it with no apologies.Score
3
killerclick
June 15, 2010 10:21:49 AM
lapoki
June 15, 2010 10:40:52 AM
Some minor changes and this can be converted to a nice build
1. Temps are too high for 24/7 use. Maybe clocking the CPU down a notch should help. I dont understand why no review site mentions IOH temps for X58 but whenever i see a build there is always a fan attached to it even with high end boards like Classified and Rampage series.
2. 470 do scale very well in SLI but the amount of heat, power and noise are too uncomfortable. Better use 2 5850s, they do not perform as well but i dont think would render any game unplayable.
3. The PSU used is already overtaxed and should be upgraded to 900-1000W unit (if using 470 SLI). Forget room for expandability, i doubt it would last a couple of months of rigorous use. This PSU should do well with 2 5850s though.
4. A SSD for boot is definetly required with 50 GB Vertex 2 available for $200 and Intel 80GB for $220, i think its a must have for a system like this.
5. A better case is also needed like Antec 902 or CM 690 II
1. Temps are too high for 24/7 use. Maybe clocking the CPU down a notch should help. I dont understand why no review site mentions IOH temps for X58 but whenever i see a build there is always a fan attached to it even with high end boards like Classified and Rampage series.
2. 470 do scale very well in SLI but the amount of heat, power and noise are too uncomfortable. Better use 2 5850s, they do not perform as well but i dont think would render any game unplayable.
3. The PSU used is already overtaxed and should be upgraded to 900-1000W unit (if using 470 SLI). Forget room for expandability, i doubt it would last a couple of months of rigorous use. This PSU should do well with 2 5850s though.
4. A SSD for boot is definetly required with 50 GB Vertex 2 available for $200 and Intel 80GB for $220, i think its a must have for a system like this.
5. A better case is also needed like Antec 902 or CM 690 II
Score
7
Poisoner
June 15, 2010 11:14:48 AM
Poisoner
June 15, 2010 11:50:50 AM
Also, I'd like to see an article where you guys take some graphics cards apart and put a better thermal compound on the card. It doesn't take that much time. I did it on my HD 4770 and it lowered my idle temps by 6C. In a hot case like this, little things like thermal compound can make a difference.
Score
1
kallamamran
June 15, 2010 12:35:25 PM
Another thing that would be reeeeeally interesting to see what kind of performance one could squeeze out of some of the absolutely cheapest parts. How well does hardware from the smaller and/or virtually unknown brands perform? =)
I mean... How many times have you not choosen the well known brand over the one with the strange or unknown name only because of just that - The name? I know I do...
Thank you for some interesting reading... As allways =)
I mean... How many times have you not choosen the well known brand over the one with the strange or unknown name only because of just that - The name? I know I do...
Thank you for some interesting reading... As allways =)
Score
3
maydaynomore
June 15, 2010 12:42:45 PM
save yourself $1,700 and buy a PS3 or a Xbox. Games are ported to the PC anyways (except for a few titles). Fifa Soccer looks horrible on a pc, or any other sports game (which is what I mostly play anymore). Spend the money on a vaccation, college fund for your kids. How about a 50" TV with an xbox and a blue-ray player. PC gaming is dying...as much as I hate it, its true. Used to be an avid PC gamer. Defended PC gaming against console fanboys. Not anymore. I've given in... We lost, they won. This was somewhat of a close fight. Next round the PC will get knocked out. I hate it as much as you do, but its inevitable.
You want someone to blame? Blame Pirates. They killed PC gaming.
You want someone to blame? Blame Pirates. They killed PC gaming.
Score
-21
doron
June 15, 2010 1:03:36 PM
PoisonerYou should of picked a different board. Surely Asus or MSI had something comparable that didn't have the slots so close together. You're choking those video cards.
PoisonerAlso, I'd like to see an article where you guys take some graphics cards apart and put a better thermal compound on the card. It doesn't take that much time. I did it on my HD 4770 and it lowered my idle temps by 6C. In a hot case like this, little things like thermal compound can make a difference.
It was said in the article that the cards have some extra ventilation holes on top of the card especially meant for SLI, besides temps were kept in check even after ocing and noise was not tested in this article so this really isn't an issue.
Antec 300 isn't a hot case my friend, far from that. In terms of airflow it beats most other cases hands down which sometimes cost much more.
Score
3
mlcloud
June 15, 2010 1:03:58 PM
Things I liked:
-Great PSU. That thing ranks similarly to Corsairs modular HX series and Antec's new TruePower series in my book.
-The HD103SJ Samsung Harddrive. This can actually be purchased for a lot cheaper than ~$80 in many instances, making it a decently performing, high storage/cost ratio hard drive.
Things I disliked:
-SLI 470s. I'm sorry, but I'm not impressed with the ultra-sized dice Nvidia decided to use for their project. While I understand the price-performance ratio was being the primary concern here, I still don't agree with the what you've sacrificed to accomplish that. BUT I'm an ATI fanboy, take this with a gallon of salt.
-Antec Three Hundred Illusion. Really? Take a look at the CM 690 II Advanced for just a couple dozen bucks more... that might have solved much of your case-related problems. *cough* temperatures *cough*
-SSD. I know, I know, it has little effect on gaming performance, but anyone who has used a decent SSD in any configuration knows what difference it makes. Shave off enough seconds in loading times here and there, you're saving quite yourself quite a bit of time (and frustration).
-Great PSU. That thing ranks similarly to Corsairs modular HX series and Antec's new TruePower series in my book.
-The HD103SJ Samsung Harddrive. This can actually be purchased for a lot cheaper than ~$80 in many instances, making it a decently performing, high storage/cost ratio hard drive.
Things I disliked:
-SLI 470s. I'm sorry, but I'm not impressed with the ultra-sized dice Nvidia decided to use for their project. While I understand the price-performance ratio was being the primary concern here, I still don't agree with the what you've sacrificed to accomplish that. BUT I'm an ATI fanboy, take this with a gallon of salt.
-Antec Three Hundred Illusion. Really? Take a look at the CM 690 II Advanced for just a couple dozen bucks more... that might have solved much of your case-related problems. *cough* temperatures *cough*
-SSD. I know, I know, it has little effect on gaming performance, but anyone who has used a decent SSD in any configuration knows what difference it makes. Shave off enough seconds in loading times here and there, you're saving quite yourself quite a bit of time (and frustration).
Score
5
digitalwitchcraft
June 15, 2010 1:10:47 PM
Poisoner
June 15, 2010 1:21:34 PM
doronIt was said in the article that the cards have some extra ventilation holes on top of the card especially meant for SLI, besides temps were kept in check even after ocing and noise was not tested in this article so this really isn't an issue.Antec 300 isn't a hot case my friend, far from that. In terms of airflow it beats most other cases hands down which sometimes cost much more.
I have a 300 case. It is a very cool case. My CPU doesn't hit over 40C doing large FFTs in Prime95. o_O
Score
4
doron
June 15, 2010 1:31:04 PM
jedimasterben
June 15, 2010 1:44:58 PM
Quote:
Not seen above is the CPU temperature reached with the $3,000 PC during the combined load test, which is an important exclusion, since the CPU and GPU of that system were tied into the same liquid-cooling system. Looking back at our test notes, the CPU temperature under combined load was approximately the same for both systems, while the $3,000 machine’s reduced cooling performance was due mostly to a flow reduction at the GPU water block.No, dude, last time you squeezed an overclocked i7 and a freakin 5970 into a single 2x120 radiator. That was your problem.
That was a bad idea. There's a reason that that kit doesn't include a GPU block, or even hint at the idea of it. A 2x120 is good for an i7 at 4GHz with no additions.
Score
3
shovenose
June 15, 2010 1:45:48 PM
gfg
June 15, 2010 1:52:49 PM
a4mulaCan't say I agree with much here. You pick up a budget case that's going to restrict airflow due to lack of wire management, and then drop 75 on a cooler. Megahalems are spectacular, I own one myself but you've defeated any gain by placing it in a subpar enclosure. Should have just went with a 902 and a CM 212+. Would have been cheaper and less restrictive.I still fail to see the love of 1366 in these builds where there is no intention of upgrading to hexacore. Save the $100 and do a p55 i7-860 build. You're going to get performance that rivals the 930 on every benchmark including those that take x8/x8 into consideration. You'll surpass the 930 in a few.700 for dual 470s when you can get dual 5850s for 560.PSU that is being heavily overtaxed. You're risking the entire 2k machine by running 100w over the psus rated value. The only thing keeping this machine running is the fact that Silverstone makes high quality parts and you have a single rail. Had this of been a multi-rail you would have been pulling out a gpu, scaling back your overclocks, or buying a new psu. At some point you have to wonder if this is a safety hazard.Sorry Thomas, just not feeling this build at all. I see about $400 of budget that could have easily have been trimmed and would have been within a few percentage points of the current build. This could have gone towards anything from your much wanted redundant storage to SSD drives.
I agree with you in the psu, but for a high end pc: tripple channel, pci-e 2x (16x) and future upgrade to hexecore is the way to choose. Maybe for mid-range pc what you say is the right choice. Then you can compare the value of each, but not the potential in the future of both systems.
That's my opinion.
Score
2
Otus
June 15, 2010 2:00:44 PM
Nice performance build, though I can't say I agree with all the choices.
Even going by official TDP numbers, 750W is cutting it awfully close. 2x220W for the GPUs and 130W for the CPU, add some for the rest of the system and you are above 600W stock. GTX 4xx has been shown to sometimes exceed the TDP without overclocking.
Personally, I would
Games from Steam and movies form whatever online shop offering downloads. Windows installation is the only thing requiring an optical drive, but that can be played around or omitted in favor of other OSes. My current rig didn't have an optical drive for the last few months, but I put in an old CD drive to quickly reinstall XP.
CrashmanNobody thought it would draw more than 750W peak load. If anyone involved with the project had known this, a larger unit would have been purchased.
Even going by official TDP numbers, 750W is cutting it awfully close. 2x220W for the GPUs and 130W for the CPU, add some for the rest of the system and you are above 600W stock. GTX 4xx has been shown to sometimes exceed the TDP without overclocking.
CrashmanWould you build a $1000 machine that can't run DVD's?
Personally, I would
Games from Steam and movies form whatever online shop offering downloads. Windows installation is the only thing requiring an optical drive, but that can be played around or omitted in favor of other OSes. My current rig didn't have an optical drive for the last few months, but I put in an old CD drive to quickly reinstall XP.
Score
1
cknobman
June 15, 2010 2:13:43 PM
Sorry this build was fail before you even put it together.
While the performance of dual 470s is great the extreme cost and extreme heat are just too much for most experienced builders to want to deal with.
Should have gone with dual 5850's and been willing to live with the reduced performance for power and heat advantages.
Plus the tinker toy case you used is just a disgrace for a high performance build. You could have at least used a Panzer box or a cheaper model Lian Li.
While the performance of dual 470s is great the extreme cost and extreme heat are just too much for most experienced builders to want to deal with.
Should have gone with dual 5850's and been willing to live with the reduced performance for power and heat advantages.
Plus the tinker toy case you used is just a disgrace for a high performance build. You could have at least used a Panzer box or a cheaper model Lian Li.
Score
-12
Otus
June 15, 2010 2:30:27 PM
Trueno07
June 15, 2010 2:31:04 PM
maydaynomoresave yourself $1,700 and buy a PS3 or a Xbox. Games are ported to the PC anyways (except for a few titles). Fifa Soccer looks horrible on a pc, or any other sports game (which is what I mostly play anymore). Spend the money on a vaccation, college fund for your kids. How about a 50" TV with an xbox and a blue-ray player. PC gaming is dying...as much as I hate it, its true. Used to be an avid PC gamer. Defended PC gaming against console fanboys. Not anymore. I've given in... We lost, they won. This was somewhat of a close fight. Next round the PC will get knocked out. I hate it as much as you do, but its inevitable. You want someone to blame? Blame Pirates. They killed PC gaming.
Games or no games, pirates or no pirates, there is nothing like custom building your own PC.
Score
11
Snipergod87
June 15, 2010 2:38:54 PM
kallamamranAnother thing that would be reeeeeally interesting to see what kind of performance one could squeeze out of some of the absolutely cheapest parts. How well does hardware from the smaller and/or virtually unknown brands perform? =)I mean... How many times have you not choosen the well known brand over the one with the strange or unknown name only because of just that - The name? I know I do... Thank you for some interesting reading... As allways =)
I agree that would be a pretty cool article
Score
1
doron
June 15, 2010 2:42:44 PM
maydaynomoresave yourself $1,700 and buy a PS3 or a Xbox. Games are ported to the PC anyways (except for a few titles). Fifa Soccer looks horrible on a pc, or any other sports game (which is what I mostly play anymore). Spend the money on a vaccation, college fund for your kids. How about a 50" TV with an xbox and a blue-ray player. PC gaming is dying...as much as I hate it, its true. Used to be an avid PC gamer. Defended PC gaming against console fanboys. Not anymore. I've given in... We lost, they won. This was somewhat of a close fight. Next round the PC will get knocked out. I hate it as much as you do, but its inevitable. You want someone to blame? Blame Pirates. They killed PC gaming.
The aforementioned pc does much more and performs wayyy better than a ps3 platform. A pc which equals PS3 performance costs roughly 500$ and is way more versatile than a ps3 - Can be hooked to a tv, monitor, can surf the web, download / upload anything I want from any source, upgrade / change / repair very easily. And I'm not even talking about the overpriced ps3 games compared to pc.
Score
4
wildeast
June 15, 2010 2:46:55 PM
sandypants
June 15, 2010 2:59:38 PM
killerclick
June 15, 2010 3:00:29 PM
I first read most of the article, and the comments, around 5:15 AM this morning. I finally got to really go through all of it now though.
A4mula, I understand your comments, but they miss what I think is the point of the SBM articles, which is to test and learn things. If someone built this identical machine today, after reading the article, I'd join you in calling them a fool. Beforehand though, I don't think a lot of the downfalls could have been predicted.
I think this was a very interesting build. Among its lessons, SLI with Fermi is infeasible unless the build is planned from square one to include it, and then it becomes merely wasteful. Another is to not count on particular OC-ing results. We're told time and time again that each chip is different; well here's an example of one that didn't do so well. That's another reason though, to focus on stock performance in a value comparison, because only that is a sure thing.
As the article states, this machine was designed to win benchmarks. I think that is how its results should be judged. Personally, I think many of us are more likely to build for usability, I know I am; but that may not be a fair way to judge how this one turned out.
If I win it, the only things I think I'd do is yank one Fermi, put in a SSD, and make the OC a little more conservative. Now THAT machine would do very well on usability, and my non-twitch games would do quite well at 1920x1080 on one 470.
A4mula, I understand your comments, but they miss what I think is the point of the SBM articles, which is to test and learn things. If someone built this identical machine today, after reading the article, I'd join you in calling them a fool. Beforehand though, I don't think a lot of the downfalls could have been predicted.
I think this was a very interesting build. Among its lessons, SLI with Fermi is infeasible unless the build is planned from square one to include it, and then it becomes merely wasteful. Another is to not count on particular OC-ing results. We're told time and time again that each chip is different; well here's an example of one that didn't do so well. That's another reason though, to focus on stock performance in a value comparison, because only that is a sure thing.
As the article states, this machine was designed to win benchmarks. I think that is how its results should be judged. Personally, I think many of us are more likely to build for usability, I know I am; but that may not be a fair way to judge how this one turned out.
If I win it, the only things I think I'd do is yank one Fermi, put in a SSD, and make the OC a little more conservative. Now THAT machine would do very well on usability, and my non-twitch games would do quite well at 1920x1080 on one 470.
Score
2
wolfram23
June 15, 2010 3:17:55 PM
tl;dr the comments, so I'm just going to point out in Test Settings you show that you're going to run Crysis at very high settings with 8xAA but you ran all the benchmarks at 0xAA. Seriously, you're just skewing results. Nobody with a top end machine is going to run 0xAA ever. Let's at least see 4xAA!!
Score
5
JohnMD1022
June 15, 2010 3:37:14 PM
ordcestus
June 15, 2010 3:46:58 PM
i thought the build was overall pretty good. I don't understand why you didn't add another spinpoint for a Raid 0 array and an extra dvd drive. that would have been easily within the budget and while the dvd drive would have done nothing for performance its an extra many people would like. The raid would have added some performance and for $60 it would have been worth it
Score
0
youssef 2010
June 15, 2010 4:45:46 PM
A very illuminating article.It seems the performance gap is getting narrower while the price gap is getting wider.BTW,the board you used is UD3 not UD7(typo in the test settings page).Also, Please remove AVG from your benchmark suite along with TMPGEnc as their results are unreliable,to say the least.Last but not least, your PSU is stable but,is it durable???!!!
Score
1
skora
June 15, 2010 4:47:38 PM
Finally, something that can play Crysis!!
Love the approach of entry level capable parts with left over room to customize the build.
As far as storage, there's a deficiency in your testing in that you're aren't tracking load times for windows or game levels. Gaming is more than just FPS and settings, but the experience overall. An SDD or a 2tb HDD that's short stroked may or may not make a difference, but we won't know until you test and track the results.
Love the approach of entry level capable parts with left over room to customize the build.
As far as storage, there's a deficiency in your testing in that you're aren't tracking load times for windows or game levels. Gaming is more than just FPS and settings, but the experience overall. An SDD or a 2tb HDD that's short stroked may or may not make a difference, but we won't know until you test and track the results.
Score
-2
ionut19
June 15, 2010 4:52:21 PM
CPU cooler: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
And it is about 20$ more expensive.
Total Current Cost $1,808 It could have fit into the budget. Wouldn't it be a better cooler for the CPU?
I saw this by mistake, http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-cpu-gpu,2... you have the UD3r and here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-cpu-gpu,2... you have ud7. A small mistake
.
Nice article though. I like reading these.
And it is about 20$ more expensive.
Total Current Cost $1,808 It could have fit into the budget. Wouldn't it be a better cooler for the CPU?
I saw this by mistake, http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-cpu-gpu,2... you have the UD3r and here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-cpu-gpu,2... you have ud7. A small mistake
.Nice article though. I like reading these.
Score
-2
coldmast
June 15, 2010 5:01:07 PM
cadder
June 15, 2010 6:29:15 PM
I enjoyed this article and I think this is a good build (except I can't comment on the video setup because I'm not experienced in that area). I like that this build used relatively common parts, no water cooling, etc.
I've built a lot of computers for AutoCAD and Revit and I usually use an i5-750 and 8GB of ram, because it is a little cheaper, but then I used a slightly faster drive for C: (velociraptor) and then put a normal drive in for D:.
I think your cable routing looks good!
AND I LIKE THE ANTEC 300 CASE! I've used 5 of them recently and they have all worked well. They seem to be made well, they are easy to build, they have plenty of openings and places to put fans. I wasn't able to buy the Illusion version but I always add a pair of Xigmatek fans on my own.
I've built a lot of computers for AutoCAD and Revit and I usually use an i5-750 and 8GB of ram, because it is a little cheaper, but then I used a slightly faster drive for C: (velociraptor) and then put a normal drive in for D:.
I think your cable routing looks good!
AND I LIKE THE ANTEC 300 CASE! I've used 5 of them recently and they have all worked well. They seem to be made well, they are easy to build, they have plenty of openings and places to put fans. I wasn't able to buy the Illusion version but I always add a pair of Xigmatek fans on my own.
Score
0
Crashman
June 15, 2010 6:50:56 PM
lapokiSome minor changes and this can be converted to a nice build1. Temps are too high for 24/7 use. Maybe clocking the CPU down a notch should help.
It could help, but you do understand this is the highest possible reading (from the CPU die, not surface) under the highest possible load right? You don't get a load like that 24/7, most people never see a load like that. I've seen stock i7's run in the low-70's under the same circumstances. lapokiI dont understand why no review site mentions IOH temps for X58 but whenever i see a build there is always a fan attached to it even with high end boards like Classified and Rampage series.
Yes, it's unfortunate that there is no way to get an accurate reading from the Northbridge. Most people just ignore that their temperature reading is wrong and report it anyway.lapokiThe PSU used is already overtaxed and should be upgraded to 900-1000W unit (if using 470 SLI). Forget room for expandability, i doubt it would last a couple of months of rigorous use. This PSU should do well with 2 5850s though.
I seriously doubt that you've ever used a program that maxes out the CPU and GPU simultaneously. On top of that, according to the power supply's efficiency rating it should have been outputing around 670W (less than its rated limit) while consuming 858W, so this isn't the end of the world.lapokiA SSD for boot is definetly required...
SSD does nothing for benchmarks, and there will be a value comparison on Friday that uses ONLY the cost and benchmark results.lapokiA better case is also needed like Antec 902 or CM 690 II
Again I refer to the competition. A so-called "better" case that is no more durable and doesn't even make the CPU cooler is just a waste of money.Score
1
Crashman
June 15, 2010 6:56:37 PM
mlcloud-Antec Three Hundred Illusion. Really? Take a look at the CM 690 II Advanced for just a couple dozen bucks more... that might have solved much of your case-related problems. *cough* temperatures *cough*
I know you probably missed it, but the answer was already mentioned in several posts above yours and it all comes down to the point that the case used was almost perfect and those who've criticized it are simply wrong.jedimasterbenNo, dude, last time you squeezed an overclocked i7 and a freakin 5970 into a single 2x120 radiator. That was your problem.That was a bad idea. There's a reason that that kit doesn't include a GPU block, or even hint at the idea of it. A 2x120 is good for an i7 at 4GHz with no additions.
You have no idea of what you speak, why don't you read THAT thread, or at least read THAT article? The radiator of THAT system was "ice cold" as the CPU got "fire hot" because of a restriction in the coolant flow. The card was made for a 3/8" high-pressure pump and the CPU block was made for a 1/2" high volume pump, end of story. You don't have to believe it any more than you have to believe that the earth is round.cknobmanYou could have at least used a Panzer box or a cheaper model Lian Li.
Have you ever used a Panzer Box or a low-end Lian-Li? Put those two next to the Three Hundred, and find that the Pazer Box is built sloppily (though a decent design for holding a radiator cheaply) and the low-cost Lian-Li is made out of something that resembles foil.Score
2
foscooter
June 15, 2010 7:14:49 PM
Althought I love my Antec 300 case, note the complete build picture, side open view. Image if you had more than one drive, look how the graphcs card take up space of at least 2 bays! At least the PCI-e power plugs into the "top" of the card, unlike my 4870.
And I can't believe the DVD they picked (muchless as a THG recommended pick). Have you read the reviews on NewEgg? No BD support, it's $99.00 more for the software. Push that price up to $198.00. Why buy a Blu-Ray player, and then have to pay more to use it? Poor choice guys.
Still, I'll take it! I mean, I hope I win it!
And I can't believe the DVD they picked (muchless as a THG recommended pick). Have you read the reviews on NewEgg? No BD support, it's $99.00 more for the software. Push that price up to $198.00. Why buy a Blu-Ray player, and then have to pay more to use it? Poor choice guys.
Still, I'll take it! I mean, I hope I win it!
Score
0
foscooter
June 15, 2010 7:18:34 PM
Was there room for a side fan? Was it included or additional? Could it really cool the GFX cards?
What is the difference b/t my Antec 300, and the 300 Illusion? Fans included? All 3: 2 front, 1 side? Top and back are included?
**EDIT**
I found out myself: The Illusion comes with blue LED fans, fronts and top, no side. Rear is regular fan.
Still, did they add a side fan?
What is the difference b/t my Antec 300, and the 300 Illusion? Fans included? All 3: 2 front, 1 side? Top and back are included?
**EDIT**
I found out myself: The Illusion comes with blue LED fans, fronts and top, no side. Rear is regular fan.
Still, did they add a side fan?
Score
0
Related resources
- Questions on june 2012 system builder pc Forum
- With Tom's System Builder Marathon in mind: Build a Infinite Budget PC Forum
- System Builder Marathon, May '09: $1,300 Enthusiast PC Forum
- System Builder Marathon: Sub-$4000 PC Forum
- Toms hadware system builder 2010 December 500 gaming pc Forum
- More resources
!