Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > About pentium 1
Word :    Username :           
 

what is the speed of a pentium 1 computer

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Google is your best friend. You wont usually get a direct answer from the regulars here with asking a question you can get with a little research so Im going to be the nice guy here and risk getting a thrashing and help you out:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium

Im going to take a beating for you now so you will learn and not make the same mistake twice. =)


Message edited by englandr753 on 07-27-2009 at 12:48:18 PM
Reply to englandr753

While Im waiting on the bus to arrive to throw myself under it...

 

@ Randomizer:
What processor did you have prior to the I7 920 and can you say
its a noticeable and worthwhile upgrade?

 

I hear the bus two stops away so answer quickly please o_O

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by englandr753 on 07-27-2009 at 12:49:24 PM
Reply to englandr753

 


thats not correct

 

pentium 1's are actually VERY slow

 

but are ideal for running such advanced operating systems as Windows 95 .
I recommend 32 mb of RAM , but you can get by with 16 if you dont mind waiting even longer

 

PS englandr753 is completely correct , but people just think Im being even more grumpy than usual if I tell them to think for themselves [ which most people seem to hate ]


Message edited by Outlander_04 on 07-27-2009 at 02:37:38 PM
Reply to Outlander_04

englandr753 wrote :

While Im waiting on the bus to arrive to throw myself under it...

@ Randomizer:
What processor did you have prior to the I7 920 and can you say
its a noticeable and worthwhile upgrade?

I hear the bus two stops away so answer quickly please o_O


I had an E6600. For video encoding it's a night and day difference, but for most other things it's not huge. Left 4 Dead loves having 4 threads to play with though. It loads them all quite evenly, leaving the remaining 4 threads basically untouched.

Reply to randomizer

You had a high enough fps anyway...

Reply to amdfangirl

70-240FPS at 1680x1050, 16xAF, 16xQ AA and max ingame settings FTW :D

Reply to randomizer

darn...

I'm like 100fps only :cry:

Reply to amdfangirl

valve never release benchmarking games that burns in the hardware lol, their games will run on old PIV with some crappy Dx 8.1 card so all that hardware for L4D is just a joke.

Reply to theholylancer

I like it that I don't need great hardware to play fun games...

Graphics aren't everything, nor is bloat.

Reply to amdfangirl

Not really. L4D requires decent CPU power because of the massive amount of AI (although it doesn't need an i7 obviously). Video card isn't that important unless you want AA.

Reply to randomizer

exactly, which is why many people loves valve, they gives you the option to have the latest and greatest, or the rusty bucket of crap and still can play their games.

i would love to see wow in full high detail glory, or crysis on a 8.1 card, but chances are, that isn't going to happen.

Reply to theholylancer

Mine plays Crysis ... happy with that ... er not the Pentium 1 tho ...

As history goes the Pentium one was a bit of a premature birth.

Almost everyone was dissappointed with the 60 / 66 ... the 75 was ho hum and the 90 lukewarm.

The bun was not cooked properly before they got it out of the oven.

It also wasn't noticeably faster than the best 486 (4/133 for AMD and 3/100 for Intel) until the speedometer pushed past 133Mhz ... then they took off nicely.

The Heatsinks were a joke and I first modded mine with a decent fan from the case way way back ... and some springs and wire and fairy floss ... wit ha small spell or two of binding.


Message edited by reynod on 07-27-2009 at 04:35:59 PM
------------------------------ Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds

 

Reply to reynod

i remember my old 486 (or eas it a pentium?) keychains lol, but now with multi cores, if a core or two fails, they just disables them and sells them as less cored versions... no more keychains for cheap lol (and at 300 a pop, a i7 keychain is way out of question, even the sempron or celeron option isnt good)

 

i started on a Pentium (something, maybe II or pro lol) when I was 5 in 1995, playing a nice CD with some sonic games and other misc games, then I moved on to transport tycoon when it was finally available, funny as I still play the delux version every now and then on my I7.


Message edited by theholylancer on 07-27-2009 at 04:55:33 PM
Reply to theholylancer

theholylancer wrote :

valve never release benchmarking games that burns in the hardware lol, their games will run on old PIV with some crappy Dx 8.1 card so all that hardware for L4D is just a joke.



Um no it wnt. L4D needs at least DX9. It wont run on DX8. In fact VALVe just added multicore rendering only to TF2 to keep the lower DX support.

But try running L4D with a P4 and a low end AGP GPU. When the horde comes it will be a very slow slide show.

BTW random, I get like 190FPS in L4D right now with my Q6600 and 4870 1GB but I don't max the AA. Leave it at like 4x because beyond that I haven't seen any difference.

And its smooth as butter. I love my 4870 1GB. Well until the 5870 comes out or Larrabee comes out and (maybe) creames everything. Then I will love either one of those.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

I can't tell the difference either. But I run it that high because I can, which is something I couldn't do before in any game. The game is too fast-paced to need AA at all really. Too bad you still can't enable triple-buffering in many games without running V-sync as well. I hate V-sync.

Reply to randomizer

randomizer wrote :

I can't tell the difference either. But I run it that high because I can, which is something I couldn't do before in any game. The game is too fast-paced to need AA at all really. Too bad you still can't enable triple-buffering in many games without running V-sync as well. I hate V-sync.



yea I hate that too. But L4D allows it. Or it does for me at least. Unless I am lucky.

Also, I'm not a big fan of the new CCC. Some things are cool, others are meh.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Relative to today's CPUs, it's about as fast as change in the republican party. Between 66 - 200 MHz for the non MMX version. With that you could, umm, run a fire wall, or a very low traffic linux web server.

I think over 75MHz is all you would need to play the original quake :D (90MHz for QII). You could also play doom II or something on it. Win 9x if your don't have anything better to do.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00

jimmysmitty wrote :

yea I hate that too. But L4D allows it. Or it does for me at least. Unless I am lucky.

Also, I'm not a big fan of the new CCC. Some things are cool, others are meh.


L4D only has options for triple buffering with vsync :(

megamanx00 wrote :

Win 9x if your don't have anything better to do...



...than fix stability issues all day.

Reply to randomizer

The original Pentiums were 60 and 66mhz.

------------------------------ DFI LP UT X58-T3eH8|Core i7 920 @ 4000|TRUE Copper w/TR-FDB-2000 push-pull|G.SKILL PI Black 3x1GB PC3 16000| SeaSonic M12D SS-750|HIS HD 4670 512MB IceQ|4x 1tb WD RE3|1x Dvico FusionHDTV5 Gold 1x DViCO FusionHDTV7 Dual Express|1x WinTV-HVR-2250|FT01-BW

 

Reply to Ancient_1

Are you sure? The original pentiums were 60 and 75MHz. I don't think the 66MHz Pentium came out until the 90MHz.

------------------------------ The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Reply to 4745454b

The original Pentiums were indeed 60 and 66mhz, running on a 60 and 66 mhz bus, respectively.
Later, running on a 50, 60, and 66mhz bus with a 1.5 multiplier were the P75, P90 and P100.
Wow, it has been a long time since we discussed the advantages of "super pipelineing".


Message edited by jitpublisher on 07-28-2009 at 02:48:06 PM
Reply to jitpublisher
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > About pentium 1
Go to:

There are 737 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them