Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > Poor 4870 performance
Word :    Username :           
 

I have been running 2 Sapphire 4870 1GB cards since February and have so far been disappointed. It benchmarks real well in 3D Mark Vantage but thats about it.

I have been playing Lord of the Rings Online with the graphics set to Ultra High and AA set to 8x. I can get upto 120FPS but will dip down to 15 -20 sometimes creating some awful jerking. I have tried this with only one card in the system and also in a crossfire setup. I even tried putting one of my 4870s in my cousins computer to see if it was my setup and I had the same results. My cousin was running a 9800GTX that would get up to 90FPS but rarely dropped below 60FPS in the exact same area. Now he has a GTX 270 and rarely drops below 90FPS in any area.

Crysis has been running horrible on her too, on medium settings I will get 25 - 30fps but its real jerky and some lighting effects look broken.

I have read alot about the 4870 and mostly I feel like mine should be running much better then they are.

Any tips that I could try to make this run better would be great.


My System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit was running Vista Ultimate 64bit both have same performance in my scenarios.
Antec 900 Case
Q6600 2.4GHZ have also tried 3Ghz and is mainly the same performance.
GA-EP45-UD3P
2X2GB G.Skill PC2-8500
2X Sapphire 4870 1GB
640GB WD Cavier Black
OCZ StealthXStream OCZ600SXS 600W
ATI Catalyst 9.4


Message edited by dpickard30 on 05-15-2009 at 06:05:23 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

big help would be to have a good overclock for your cpu. 3ghz is good. 3.5 is better if you can get it. are you ocing your 4870. i have a 4870x2 its dodgy as well but still has good fps. (when i over clock.
also whats your gpu driver?? i am running ati 9.3 drivers at the moment as they work the best with me. wait till tomorow and 9.5 will be out. might fix some problems. also, 8x AA??? thats a little too crazy. try 2x and if you must 4x. 4x and 8x have no real difference between them.

opps just noticed you said 9.4...

------------------------------ http://www.speedtest.net/result/603075842.png
Australian internet at its best...
Core i7 920 @ 3.76 ghz > Thermalright u120 > Thermaltake 850w psu > Hd 5870 + 5870 vapor x
> DDR3 1600mhz > ex58ud4p
Reply to heroofspirits

Your cards are severely bottlenecked by your slow processor speed.

You cant compare you friends fps to yours unless he's using the exact same settings and has the exact same 2.4ghz clock speed.

Your running everything Ultra high with 8x AA, I mean cmon, simple answer is turn the settings down and turn the AA to 4x.

------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

Yeah, leave your CPU at At least 3GHz. By the way I have 1 hd4870 1gb Vipor-X runing in Crossfire with HIS hd4870 1GB and I am running all games at 8xAA and 16xAniso, except Crysis on which I have AA turned off.

 

Games I play Left4Dead, Fallout 3, Far Cry 2 (this one is running at 4xAA), Grid, Burnout, COD 4

 

my specs:

 

Phenom II x4 940 BE @ 3.515GHz
Windows Vista 64bit Business
RAM: G.Skill 4GB 2x2 @ 1066
HD 1 320GB and 1 640 GB WD 16MB Cache SATA

 

Edit: Also I game at 1080p : 1920x1080 resolution


Message edited by Euphoria_MK on 05-15-2009 at 02:40:08 PM
Reply to Euphoria_MK

Here is the thing my cousin has the exact same processor he is running on an ASRock P43 chipset board and he only has PC2-6400. As I stated before, I placed one of my cards in his rig and it had the same massive dips in fps where his did not.

I did not spend $500 on 2 cards to start cranking stuff down, especially when I have seen it run better with just one 9800GTX. So are you telling me ATI cards need more bandwith then a 9800GTX?

In LOTRO 1x and 8x only make about a 2 - 5 fps difference in my performance. I usually run my cpu at 3Ghz by changing my fsb to 1066 anything past that and it seems to get unstable. It will run at 3ghz for a few weeks and sometimes it will default back to 2.4 after a reboot.

I game at 1680X1050, I have noticed in GPU-Z that my cards do not go over 50% in crossfire and if I physically remove one of the cards I can get it to get up to 62% usage. Is that pretty normal?

Reply to dpickard30

If your system is unstable dont overclock your CPU.
Your cards should perform fine the way they are.

 

I am not sure why you are not getting any game performance increase.
You have a good setup....
Dont know try maybe Windows Vista 64 bit instead of Windows 7...
Windows 7 ATI drivers are still very new, and might be experiencing some issues...

 

I am using CAT 9.4 drivers for Vista 64bit and dont have issues with my cards. They run great in Crossfire.

 

BTW, I will install Cat 9.5 today when ATI updates it's drivers site and see if there are any performance differences.

 


Message edited by Euphoria_MK on 05-15-2009 at 04:12:27 PM
Reply to Euphoria_MK

I was using Vista 64 I upgraded to Windows 7 about a week ago, I have ran the 9.4 drivers for about 3 weeks before I upgraded to Windows 7.

It seems like alot of the games I play just dont seem to play nice with ATI. I played Warhammer Online for a little while but they did something to there game that made me go from 60FPS on high settings to 20 -25FPS on the lowest settings.

I had an 8800GT before I bought the 4870s and I see only a fraction of improvement on Crysis, FarCry looks pretty good too but like any other game I can get High FPS but the sudden dips in frames just makes it feel jerky.

I will be anxious to try the 9.5 drivers today.


Message edited by dpickard30 on 05-15-2009 at 04:26:14 PM
Reply to dpickard30
- 0 +

yeap its a windows 7 driver bug. They are just vista64 drivers a lil moded.
Got win update notificatio that new driver released TODAY for download but nothing happened. 9.5 should release soon. I got some very annoying Win7 bugs with the 9.4 drivers under win 7 including some bad performance. Hope ati dosnt screw it up with the 9.5 for win7 .

------------------------------ N-ai Treaba !!!
Reply to Ciuy

At that resolution you will never see the full potential of those cards.


Message edited by zipzoomflyhigh on 05-15-2009 at 08:57:29 PM
------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

I have hooked it up to my 42" lcd tv running 1920X1080 through HDCP and the fps is the same as when I run 1680X1050

Reply to dpickard30

So that is good news. You should not see that big of a hit at higher resolution since you are running crossfire

Reply to Euphoria_MK

dpickard30 wrote :

I have hooked it up to my 42" lcd tv running 1920X1080 through HDCP and the fps is the same as when I run 1680X1050



Then your cards are definitely being bottlenecked by your cpu.

------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

I have been reading some guides and I am going to try to achieve 3.2Ghz or 3.4Ghz depending on temps and stability tongiht. When I am playing the game G15 LCD shows cpu usage at about 20 - 25% with Core 0 and 1 at about 50% each and the Core 3 and 4 rarely ever get used. Call of Duty WaW seems to spread the load across all 4 though.

Reply to dpickard30

2.4ghz cpu can run games fine, crossfire 4870's can run games fine, p45 will not restrict things, fresh install of windows should eliminate any old driver related problems.

The basic thing of catalyst A.I settings and games being run in windowed mode by accident deserve to be asked but your primary complain seems to be about LotR's and i do not have experience of that game.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

In the Catalyst Control Center, do you have Catalyst AI turned on? If not, you'll not notice any performance difference from CrossfireX.

Also, look in device manager and see what it says about what driver version you are running. Although I DL'ed the proper driver package for Win7 64-bit, it installed old drivers from several months ago. I installed the correct driver manually through device manager and my performance on my 4830 jumped significantly.

Reply to jedimasterben

I beleive I have CCC is set to default.

Reply to dpickard30

Go to 3d options and set the cat a.i to advanced.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

What are you 3DMark Vantage scores? I seem to be having the same issues... I was running Windows 7 x64, but switched back to Vista Ult. x64 today, and my scores went up very little... That's probably just because it's a clean install with absolutely no other processes running... I just went into CCC and set AI to advanced and am fixing to run 3DMark again... I'll post back in a few...

Abit AB9 QuadGT mobo
(2) 2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC6400
(2) 2GB Samsung PC6400
Intel E8500 Wolfsdale @ stock 3GHz
Thermaltake 850W PSU
(2) Radeon HD4870 cards


What would good scores be in 3DMark Vantage? I'm not really even sure what to compare them to...


Message edited by rkwerchan on 05-16-2009 at 12:46:03 AM
Reply to rkwerchan

Everything went up about 50 points with AI set to advanced -
I'm at:

P10261
GPU - 13072
CPU - 6237


Reply to rkwerchan

I put my CPU back to 3Ghz which is what I run it at 98% of the time and ran 3DMark and this is my score:

P12839
GPU - 13821
CPU - 10582

Reply to dpickard30

Wow... you really owned me on CPU... I didn't realize there was that big of a difference between the two processors... guess I'll have to start on the OC process now... but we did just about match up on the cards, so now I know mines doing what it should... thanks for posting that...

Reply to rkwerchan

I still dip real bad in games on the frames so I hope the new driver fixes it, whenever that comes out.

Reply to dpickard30

3D mark does not give a fair rerpresentation of a comp's computer.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

I mean ability not computer.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

strangestranger wrote :

2.4ghz cpu can run games fine, crossfire 4870's can run games fine, p45 will not restrict things, fresh install of windows should eliminate any old driver related problems.

The basic thing of catalyst A.I settings and games being run in windowed mode by accident deserve to be asked but your primary complain seems to be about LotR's and i do not have experience of that game.




Sure 2.4ghz will run games fine. But it will still bottleneck two 4870's for sure. You wont see the full potential of the cards at that clock speed. Did you read the article on Toms about the 4770? A single 4770 was bottlenecked by a 2.8ghz 7850 X2. When the same card was run with an i7 965 the fps went through the roof.

------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

Cpu limit does not equal bottleneck, a glass bein gfilled to it brim despite you having more water in the jug is not the same as the water flow being restricted.

Seriously, with 2.4ghz, you can still see gains from crossfire so bottleneck, frankly no. easily playable games with no noticable effects from the "low" speed.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger
- 0 +

Have you ever tried your friend's graphics card in your computer? And a full reinstall often helps things (especially if your drivers are a mess). Also, that jerking at certain times sounds more like hard drive reading to me. Maybe reinstall the game (and Windows, if you can) and give it a good defrag.

------------------------------ Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.0GHz - 1.25V > GA-MA790GP-DS4H > XFX ATI 4850 1GB > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1066MHz 5-5-5-15-2T > PCP&C 610W
Athlon II X2 250 3.0GHz > GA-MA770T-UD3P > Sapphire ATI 4650 512MB DDR3 > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1600MHz@1066MHz > XP/Win7 Enter 64
Reply to EXT64

Even with the CPU at 2.4 GHz, he should really have no problems running the games he is running.

This is definitely a driver issue or software issue, and not a cpu-bottleneck issue.

btw, your PSU might not be enough if you're trying to run 2x4870s on a 600watt

------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath

I have an APC battery backup and when under load I rarely exceed 350Watts and thats including my 22" monitor.

From everything I have read just one of my cards should perform much better then a 9800GTX. My cousin has a very similar machine and even running his at 2.4 GHZ with PC2-6400 Ram he still out performs me. We both have all the settings the exact same. Even when I placed one of my cards in his computer it did the exact smae thing it does on mine. It will get upto 90-120 FPS but when you go to turn it will kind of jerk and drop to like 20FPS briefly and then go back up to 90-120. His car would only get upto 90 but rarely dipped below 60.

Reply to dpickard30

I am trying to convince him to let me borrow his 9800GTX so I can try it on my system. He has a GTX275 now that pushes upwards around 160 and will dip down to 90 in intense areas with everything maxed and 8Xaa 16AF.

Reply to dpickard30

I didnt say his PROBLEM was a cpu bottleneck issue.

I'm saying his cpu cant keep up with two of those card and he will never see their full potential at that clock speed.

------------------------------ P965/Q6700@3.2 8MB HD4850 OC Edition
4GB Corsair XMS 800
Vista64/Win7
Fatality 550w/Antec 300
Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

Really?

You used the word severe bottleneck as if that was a problem when it ain't.

I know that you can see gains by crossfire with that speed of cpu so it isn't as if it is cpu limited at all times.

Cpu speed should rarely be mentioned in relation to modern processors as a factor or performance exceopt when other avenues have already been explored IMO.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

Well I downloaded Catalyst 9.5 and my average FPS dropped by 20.

Reply to dpickard30
- 0 +

dpickard: Heh, so that's not good is it?

I just bought a single Radeon 4870 512Mb and I have experienced some troubles. Before I explain any, I would like to know: Would I get a performance increase by upgrading to Vista? I currently use XP professional 32bit, so naturally can't use Direct X 10.

I mainly play L4D, for which this card should be plenty capable of running I think. I prefer to play in windowed mode as I do a lot of design and otherwise just find fast window switching very convenient - however, the game runs at 30 FPS in windowed mode (1680x1050), with maximum settings.

Full screen I get >60 FPS, which is much better, though I still wonder if it is as good as it should be.

Thank you so much with any help you can offer - I have been Google hunting for some information about Radeon 4870s, and this thread caught my eye.


My specs:

Windows XP 32bit professional
4 Gbs DDR3 RAM (2 x 2Gb)
MSI P965 mobo
520W power
XFX Radeon HD 4870 512Mb DDR5 - Using latest ATI Catalyst drivers (9.5)
Two DVI monitors, one 1680x1050, the other 1280x1024


Another thing is that I get some videos in my chat program going blank on the 2nd monitor, if I have a tool-tip pop-up in the same horizontal space. I'm not so fussed about this problem, though.


Message edited by merkaba on 06-03-2009 at 06:50:14 PM
Reply to merkaba
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > ATI > Poor 4870 performance
Go to:

There are 461 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them