Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > (another) dual xeon vs single i7 vs quad amd

(another) dual xeon vs single i7 vs quad amd

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - (another) dual xeon vs single i7 vs quad amd

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Gang,

I'm a huge multitasker, my present machine is run 24/7 and I reboot about three times a year. I don't close programs, I usually move stuff around between three monitors and tend to have 60-80 tasks running at once when displayed in Windows Task Manager. When I load the system particularly heavy, the interactiveness of the GUI really starts to be affected.

I'm building a new system. I'm running Windows 7 on a VM, and I hate the interface (I use XP and have stayed away from Vista because I hate its interface). I'm hoping Win7 either has a throwback interface to the Win2k/XP days, or, with some work, is fully customizable to achieve the same effect.

Having said that, after reading the benefits of Win7 on 64-bit hardware, I'm giving it a serious look.

Which brings me to architecture. I don't do a lot of gaming. Mostly I use a ton of desktop apps, mapping software, satellite imagery, and of course a million browser windows, Outlook managing several 2+GB PST files, etc.

Core i7 times one or Xeon 5500 times two? Or quad board with four AMD CPUS? Eight or more physical/sixteen or more virtual cores really has appeal. I understand that for software that is specifically written to take advantage of massively multi-cored systems will no doubt perform better, but what I am looking for is overall system speed when under heavy load. Most importantly, I want my GUI to remain interactively-instantaneous even when I've got a million things open and active. Perhaps trivial to most, the ability to have windows not "skip" when I scroll, fast window paints, instantaneous reaction to icons being clicked, etc., is worth a few extra dollars on system harware considering I want to future-proof this system and will be using it for the next 5 years.

Having said all that, will Win7 perform better with dual Xeons for "regular" user-level apps, vs a single i7 overclocked? Again, I know its trivial, but when I have 3GB RAM in use and 90% CPU load across most cores, I still want Word to open in the blink of an eye :)

What's my best option?

Thanks.


Message edited by tucansam on 07-29-2009 at 08:40:30 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

First, you definitely want Windows 7 - it will stay responsive with a million windows better than Vista does, and far better than XP. A single i7 or AMD quad should be more than enough, though you'll want a TON of RAM and a dedicated video card (though you won't need a top end one).

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

well if you want dual LGA1366 and tons of ram

SUPERMICRO MBD-X8DAH+-O, 18 DDR3 slots
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813182176

though you don't need it, an i7 + 12GB of memory should do you fine
or an AMD quad with 8GB

Reply to mindless728
- 0 +

Oh, and if you want apps to open in the blink of an eye, you'll want an SSD.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

Hi,

Did you get any solution for your question, I am also looking for the same kind of "super Power" machine,
Please let us know what Recommended configuration you got for such high level multitasking heavy projects..

Reply to b4u2_gaurav

I decided on a single Core i7.

I want, above all, a super-quiet system, and the case I selected (CM Centurion 590) would be a tight fit for a dual CPU board, if it fit at all. A second CPU would be nice, but right now I figure the overall cost-to-performance ratio, plus my need for a quiet system, better lends itself to a single CPU.

I plan to overclock the i7 to maximize performance, something I'm not sure I could do with a Xeon (haven't researched it much). I don't have tasks working in the background (ie a rendering underway while I'm multitasking) so interactive performance of the in-focus app should be sufficient with a single CPU, given enough RAM to manage apps that are open but idle.

I may look into a more robust system down the road, but for now I'll see how a single i7 performs for my needs.

Reply to tucansam
- 0 +

tucansam wrote :

I decided on a single Core i7.

I want, above all, a super-quiet system, and the case I selected (CM Centurion 590) would be a tight fit for a dual CPU board, if it fit at all. A second CPU would be nice, but right now I figure the overall cost-to-performance ratio, plus my need for a quiet system, better lends itself to a single CPU.

I plan to overclock the i7 to maximize performance, something I'm not sure I could do with a Xeon (haven't researched it much). I don't have tasks working in the background (ie a rendering underway while I'm multitasking) so interactive performance of the in-focus app should be sufficient with a single CPU, given enough RAM to manage apps that are open but idle.

I may look into a more robust system down the road, but for now I'll see how a single i7 performs for my needs.



So... Progress report? How goes the i7 so far?

Reply to arvliet

It ain't the cores ---- it's the RAMs (and as noted) the disk I/O.

And If you want 'super quiet' you do not want to OC ---- you want to underclock and undervolt to keep temps down ....

Reply to wisecracker
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > (another) dual xeon vs single i7 vs quad amd
Go to:

There are 591 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 tehue won the Freshman badge
  • 12:11 mi1ez won the Watchman badge
  • 01:00 sighQ2 won the Freshman badge
  • 09:06 ulysses35 won the CPUs badge
  • 01:00 fleeb won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 jaymoney61 won the Freshman badge
  • 07:06 amdfangirl won the Watchman badge
  • 01:00 benw won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 anmjoven won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 dpnaugle won the Freshman badge