saint19 :
1- Sorry, I'm referring to H50 and H70 made by Asetek, the A70 looks good but cost more that Hyper 212+.
2- The Zalman is better for price/performance/noise, that's why we prefer it.
1- But it also performs much better. It's too bad it wasn't a part of the mega-review carried out by benchmarkreviews; would have been great to know where it stood with the big names.
2- According to
this review of Titan Fenrir EVO, it is much quieter than the Zalman, even though it doesn't perform quite as well (it does come pretty damn close). It's definitely not a bad buy, and you said as much.
JackNaylorPE :
You decide:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=432&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=20
Intel-LGA1366 CPU Cooler Thermal Difference
ProlimaTech Megahalems 24.29°C over ambient
Thermalright Venomous-X 24.47°C over ambient
Scythe Mugen-2 SCMG-2000 26.03°C over ambient
Cogage Arrow 26.53°C over ambient
Titan FENRIR TTC-NK85TZ 27.92°C over ambient
Zalman CNPS10X-Performa 28.08°C over ambient
Coolink Corator-DS 28.38°C over ambient
Cogage TRUE Spirit 28.39°C over ambient
Noctual NH-D14 (2x 140) 29.10°C over ambient
ProlimaTech Armageddon 29.26°C over ambient
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme 29.40°C over ambient
CyberPowerPC XtremeGear HP-1216B 29.42°C over ambient
3R-System IceAge Prima Boss-II IA-120B2 29.46°C over ambient
Tuniq Tower 120 Extreme 29.52°C over ambient
Intel DBX-B ATS (Performance) 29.65°C over ambient
Xigmatek Balder SD1283 CAC-SXHH3-U06 30.00°C over ambient
Xigmatek Thor's Hammer S126384 30.76°C over ambient
Noctua NH-U12P 31.68°C over ambient
Thermaltake Contac-29 CLP0568 32.60°C over ambient
The Scythe Mugen 2 at $40 is a sure winner if budget is a criteria.
Note however that these tests are subject to heat signature variations which differ by CPU. In the 950 test, the top 3 finishers were the same but in different order.That test went :
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=447&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=13
1) Venemous X
2) Scythe Mugen 2 (+0.27C)
3) Prolmatech Megahalems (+0.89).
In the 920 test, the Mega was on top again.....
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=544&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=11
1) Prolimatech Megahalems
2) Prolimatech SuperMega (+0.2)
3) VenemousX (+0.5)
4) Scythe Mugen 2 (+2.50C)
Ha, why all the fuss over a mere 0.16C?
I notice you're using the results of the high output fan to compare the coolers, which makes sense, ofcourse - the best way to judge the cooling potential of the heatsinks is to test all of them under similar conditions, i.e. using the same, high output fan.
However, I think I'm more interested in determining what kind of performance I'll get at stock since I don't intend on getting a high output fan anytime soon. According to the 920 test (Q2), the rankings are like:
1. CM V6GT
2. Prolimatech Megahalems (+0.9)
3. Prolimatech Super Mega (+1.1)
4. Scythe Mugen 2 (+3.0)
|
7. Zalman CNPS 10X Performa (+3.2)
|
11. Titan Fenrir (+6.3)
I guess the Prolimatechs shouldn't count so much since a fan isn't even provided with these and a separate fan would need to be purchased and therefore factored into the total cost.
With the 930 test, it goes something like:
1. Venomous X
2. Zalman CNPS 10X Performa (+0.34)
3. Xigmatek Aegir (+0.8)
4. Scythe Mugen 2 (+2.41)
5. Titan Evo (+2.85)
Now that's what you call conflicting results. I'd have loved to known where the V6GT would have ranked in the 930 test. It was my initial, initial choice (since it was the only thing available where I live, urgh) and the reviews were mostly positive.
The Zalman CNPS 10X Performa looks great, but I can't find it on overclockersuk. (As you might have guessed, I don't actually live in the UK and plan to get whatever component through a friend who does live there.) So any reliable websites you guys could recommend where I could look for the Performa?