Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Drives > SAS: Cheatah 6gb/s 15k vs UltraStar 6gb/s 15k

SAS: Cheatah 6gb/s 15k vs UltraStar 6gb/s 15k

Forum Storage : Hard Drives SAS: Cheatah 6gb/s 15k vs UltraStar 6gb/s 15k

Word :    Username :           
 

hello and merry christmas to all of you,

i have been wondering about these 2 drives before i buy one, ultrastar 15k600 sas has 64mb of cache, the cheatah sas 15k has 16 mg of cache.....
i will be using 1 sas drive only, i hope to get the ultimate! fastest in these 2 drives.
i understand these are very new drives and hope someone here will know, i dont need a encripted drive.
thank you kindley

which drive is fastest out of these 2.....


Message edited by ericanthony on 12-14-2010 at 08:23:45 PM
Reply to ericanthony
Register or log in to remove.

The 15K.7 is a BIT faster than the 15K600 (195 MB/s vs 200 MB/s throughput respectively). See article => http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 566-5.html

If you are looking for a fast drive you may be best off with an SSD with a SandForce controller. I.E. => http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] -_-Product
Sequential Access - Read:up to 285MB/s
Sequential Access - Write:up to 275MB/s
Power Consumption (Active):2W
Power Consumption (Idle):0.5W

Reply to sadams04

sadams04 wrote :

The 15K.7 is a BIT faster than the 15K600 (195 MB/s vs 200 MB/s throughput respectively). See article => http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 566-5.html

If you are looking for a fast drive you may be best off with an SSD with a SandForce controller. I.E. => http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] -_-Product
Sequential Access - Read:up to 285MB/s
Sequential Access - Write:up to 275MB/s
Power Consumption (Active):2W
Power Consumption (Idle):0.5W



thanks for that!
i had a feeling the cheatah 15k sas was a bit faster, but didnt see or find the test for the 600gb drives...
i already have a crusial c300 ssd........are you an sas person or ssd or both?

Reply to ericanthony

SSD > SAS. Lower power consumption and noise are keys for me.

EDIT: Let me rephrase... SSD > SAS for a single drive. SAS > SSD for RAID 0 configs (price / performance favors the SAS).


Message edited by sadams04 on 12-14-2010 at 08:53:51 PM
Reply to sadams04

just ordered the 600gb 6gb/s sas seagate cheatah 15k drive.....as soon as they come in there gone......$530. total 2nd day delivery.....im just hooked on sas and scsi....i have a new controller from:Atto H608 HBC, im running my crucial c300 thru it not bad at all.....

thanks for your help......
im vaporchilled cooled on my cpu i will put my sig later :)

Reply to ericanthony
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Drives > SAS: Cheatah 6gb/s 15k vs UltraStar 6gb/s 15k
Go to:

There are 1831 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Mushkin Chronos
By willard, 2 hours ago:

No. You will still get the drive's rated IOPS even over SATA II, which is by far the...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts