I have used, built and tested AMD rigs and i have found no difference w/e between 800 and 1066 for a real world desktop environment. If one required extra headroom for OC fair enough In fact most of clients upgrade to 1066 with this misconception and end up having issues getting their 1066 to run at 1066 due to lack of experience!
I have used, built and tested AMD rigs and i have found no difference w/e between 800 and 1066 for a real world desktop environment. If one required extra headroom for OC fair enough In fact most of clients upgrade to 1066 with this misconception and end up having issues getting their 1066 to run at 1066 due to lack of experience!
Using DDR2 1066 RAM on an AMD build has nothing to do with overclocking. The integrated RAM controller benefits from the additional bandwidth without overclocking the CPU, unlike Intel Core 2 chips.
More trouble than worth if just running at stock from my experience Way too much frustration by peeps not getting 1066 to run as advertised if you read feedback ^^
We'll have to agree to disagree. This isn't helping the OP. DDR2 1066 has never been a problem for any of my builds. A Phenom II really deserves RAM that will take full advantage of the CPU's built-in RAM controller IMO.
Well thats up to you but the gains from DDR2-->DDR3 aren't great. Onboard GPU means the integrated graphics that is available on certain chipsets/motherboards Example you have a GF8200 on 750a , HD3200 on 780G, and HD3300 on 790GX
Message edited by batuchka on 05-01-2009 at 10:39:04 AM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.