Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Which of these video cards is worth buying?

Which of these video cards is worth buying?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Which of these video cards is worth buying?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

EVGA 01G-P3-1182-AR GeForce GTX 285 FTW Edition 1GB 512-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 SLI
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814102839

or

SAPPHIRE Atomic Radeon HD 4890 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFire (GPU at 1000 MHz w/ Vapor-X technology)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814130483

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

What are you using this for, what are your system specifications?

Reply to AKM880

I plan on using this for mostly gaming for such games as Crysis and Far Cry 2. This is going to be part of my new build that will most likely have a i7 920 Processor.

Reply to genetix

If you check the benchmarks on this site I think you will find the GTX 285 is generally the stronger card , but whether you need it is all about the resolution of your monitor .

Reply to Outlander_04

The recommended resolution of my monitor is 1280 x 1024 on a 19". I was planning on purchasing this new build soon, so any opinions would be appreciated.

Reply to genetix

Get the 4890, much better in price-per-performance

------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath

4890 all the way.

gtx285 + the ftw edition lol is jsut too much for your monitor. I mean the only game it could struggle ... is Crysis at very high with AA and AF enabled. It will play Far Cry 2 maex out though.

Plus if we count with you

2 +8 +5 + "X" as losw pressure turbo = 15 +6 = 21
4+8+9+0 = 12+9+0 = 21

Yes, n vidias performance is still betterr at this particular power index.

Consider buying Hd4890.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Christopher11 on 05-24-2009 at 09:15:11 PM
Reply to Christopher11

Christopher11 wrote :

4890 all the way.

gtx285 + the ftw edition lol is jsut too much for your monitor. I mean the only game it could struggle ... is Crysis at very high with AA and AF enabled. It will play Far Cry 2 maex out though.

Plus if we count with you

2 +8 +5 + "X" as losw pressure turbo = 15 +6 = 21
4+8+9+0 = 12+9+0 = 21

Yes, n vidias performance is still betterr at this particular power index.

Consider buying Hd4890.


Drop the joke already. I've seen at least 10 threads where you've used this "numeric theory".

Reply to g3force

g3force wrote :

Drop the joke already. I've seen at least 10 threads where you've used this "numeric theory".




this is not jioke, this is theory which was made by our research bureau.

And one more thing: tell me what did I say wrong? Please compare facts and statementz from my posts to the ones posted now and further and to graphics charcts.
the thing is - tbhis theory works.

Reply to Christopher11

@Christopher11, according to your theory the 9800GTX is better than the GTX295. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by GTS458 on 05-24-2009 at 09:58:47 PM
Reply to GTS458

Christopher11 wrote :

this is not jioke, this is theory which was made by our research bureau.

And one more thing: tell me what did I say wrong? Please compare facts and statementz from my posts to the ones posted now and further and to graphics charcts.
the thing is - tbhis theory works.



You have a research bureau - yet you can't even spell correctly.

lulz


Message edited by Bluescreendeath on 05-24-2009 at 10:03:17 PM
------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath

Oh dont be envy because.. yes I dO!


Message edited by Christopher11 on 05-24-2009 at 10:11:20 PM
Reply to Christopher11

GTS458 wrote :

@Christopher11, according to your theory the 9800GTX is better than the GTX295. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:




No way.

9+8+0+0 = 17 whereas 2+9+5+ low pressure turbo ) x 2 = 16 +5-6 ) * 2 = 42-44.


17 < 42-44

Reply to Christopher11

RivaTNT64 = 6+4+Kaboooom (TNTx400) = 130000000000

I want a TNT....

This is hilarious, the funniest thing I have seen on Tom's.

AC

Reply to ac3144

If you are going to keep your 19" monitor and run at 1280 x 1024 you don't need either of those cards or a Core i-7.

 

You would be far better off with an Nvidia GTS250 or an ATI 4850. They have more than enough pixel power for a 19" screen. You would be over-paying otherwise.

 

If you want a better card you should invest in a bigger monitor first.

 

You only need power house cards like what you are looking at for 24" inch monitors or better.


Message edited by Rwayne on 05-25-2009 at 01:04:24 AM
------------------------------ AMD 64x2 5000 Black Edition OC’d @ 2.9 GHz - Sapphire HD4870 Toxic 512MB Videocard - MSI K9A Platinum Motherboard - 2GBs Kingston Hyper-X DDR2 800 - Cooler Master Centurion 534 case - 700W OCZ Game Stream PSU - Windows XP - Logitech Illuminated keyboard
Reply to Rwayne

+1 what Rwayne posted.

Reply to AKM880

Christopher11 wrote :

No way.

9+8+0+0 = 17 whereas 2+9+5+ low pressure turbo ) x 2 = 16 +5-6 ) * 2 = 42-44.


17 < 42-44



9800GTX and the 250 GTS are near about the same...what does your theory suggest

9+8+0+0=17

2+5+0=7

????????

Reply to UberGenocide

UberGenocide wrote :

9800GTX and the 250 GTS are near about the same...what does your theory suggest

9+8+0+0=17

2+5+0=7

????????




The turbo boost is not reflected in the gts 250 name.
Its 2+5+0+10 = 17

Reply to Christopher11

Christopher11 wrote :

The turbo boost is not reflected in the gts 250 name.
Its 2+5+0+10 = 17


Can you link/cite a reputable source regarding this theory?

Reply to g3force

A Radeon HD 4870 would be more than enough for you.

1gb HIS IceQ4+ Radeon HD 4870 Turbo: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814161265

Reply to edeawillrule

g3force wrote :

Can you link/cite a reputable source regarding this theory?



He pulls this information out of his ass.

------------------------------ i7 920, E5300
GTX260, HD4870, HD4830
Reply to Bluescreendeath

Bluescreendeath wrote :

He pulls this information out of his ass.



+1

Reply to edeawillrule

g3force wrote :

Can you link/cite a reputable source regarding this theory?




The source of this theory is our research bureau. I posted some information on it but eventually the thread was aloced.. and i wanted to add up even more..

Reply to Christopher11
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Which of these video cards is worth buying?
Go to:

There are 1296 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them