i was thinking about the linux usability thing, and came up with this.
most of the distros out there are too big. They seem to try to be all things to all people. I say this because I can use my distro cd to install a firewall, a development workstation, an office pc, or a full on cross-platform server.
or i can go and buy (say) a Mandrake SNF CD which <i>only</i> installs a firewall. That concept is what I liked about BeOS when I tried it - clean, and it only had what I needed to do desktop stuff. And I didn't have to think "which fs do i want?" when i installed it.
what I'm thinking is put together a new user-oriented pack. one which doesn't make you choose between kde or gnome. which doesn't make you choose between balsa or evolution. Most folks don't want to be computer geeks, and they shouldn't have to be just to use (or even install) linux at home.
It would probably be rpm based, so you could certainly add more things to it, but by default, it'd be pretty lean.
I know it's been said before, but I still don't see it happening...
Any one got any thoughts about this?
Edit: What did you new users want out of linux? What should be different?
rich.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by rjb263 on 10/16/01 01:42 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Not even a new user, I'm still reading up on it. I don't have a compatible printer, that's why I'm hesitant.
Anyways, I only use Office suites, listen to mp3s, surf the internet, and burn CDs. I know Linux is meant for power users, but sometimes, it's still kinda tricky to operate. I want to be able to see my other partitions right off the bat, like in Mandrake 8.1. So far, that's my favorite one yet (I'm back in Windows, like I said). A firewall would be nice, but if it needs <b>a lot of configuring</b>, then I'd be back in Windows.
I want to learn Linux, and expand my horizons , but for now, I'd like ease of use. Even better would be a distro that's more compact than the rest. I see stuff in the menu that I never think to use, anyways.
Are you really thinking of putting together something easier? Isn't it difficult?
yeah, i'm thinking pretty hard about it. nothing's impossible, just don't expect another RedHat!
The really hard part is figuring out what's needed. That's why I'm wondering what non-geeks want. I think most people want fast, reliable, and easy to use.
So something like a Gnome desktop, with SO6 (when out of beta...) and Gimp, Galeon web browser, Evolution email, easy-to-configure dialup settings (with internet sharing?), xmms+grip (play music, and rip cds), and xcdroast or similar.
Probably with some basic security, and something like portsentry running so you know when someone scans your box.
What the hell... I'll start downloading source now. Not sure about the Gnome desktop. The idea of having a hardware rendered desktop though Evas and Enlightenment E17 is too cool!
Re the printer, did you try a Ghostscript PCL3 driver?
Include Pico and the Gnome terminal. Gimp is an excellent choice. Maybe Winamp Linux Alpha? (I now it's in Alpha...but...)
The two most used applications are Microsoft Word and Internet Explorer. Maybe Music Match Jukebox. These are these are the two great holes in Linux...Is somebody working on an Open Source Word Clone?
Users don't wanna know about WINE...There has to be some kind of seamless, easy-to-configure interface for WINE apps.
Lets face it, *nix just isn't a GUI OS. That's why I like it. I enjoy mucking arround at a term every now and then...Linux, from a usablilty stand point, is still very hard, which is the way it should be, because that's where the power of Linux lies.
"If you teach a child to read, then he or her will be able to pass a literacy test" - George W.
don't worry Red_Zealot, there would always be a terminal in there somewhere...
I don't think I'd worry about Wine, either. Enough to think about getting Linux stuff working, without trying to get Windows stuff working too!
The Word Processor app is why I was thinking of Sun's Star Office 6. Maybe others do a better job?
I have to disagree about hard to use being a good thing. I certainly don't want to dilute the "power" of Linux, just rationalise it a bit for the average user. You could still do all of the old-school stuff, but day-to-day should be easier. Also, I prefer Gnome myself, but btvillan's note about KDE got me thinking again. I'm sifting through the KDE's and Gnomes usability sites...
From what I've seen every Linux distro is hopelessly bloated, I mean who needs Vi, EMACS, Vim, Jove, and the other dozen text editors?!? If you want to cut down on bloat make your own distro (www.linuxfromscratch.org) or just go straight to FreeBSD which is far more integrated than Linux and doesn't have the licensing spectre hanging over it.
Me "I bought a TNT2 M64, the BIOS says its a Vanta"
IOMagic "Theyre the same card"
Me "Um, no"
I hated KDE just because the fonts sucked so bad that I couldn't read webpages. I know there's a solution out there somewhere, I just don't have time to dig for it nor the experience to do it safely.
Catheter and Caffeine IV are in place. Let's PLAY.
Your right. My Mandrake 8.0 is very bloated indeed. Do you guys know how to remove some of the excess? Like you said, I don't need 3 different text editors, 3 different telnet apps, 2 spreadsheets, etc. etc..
Catheter and Caffeine IV are in place. Let's PLAY.
or use the mandrake software manager, otherwise it'll get confused :-(
I still reckon you shouldn't need to in the first place.
re KDE, I compiled KDE 2.2.1 and it seems pretty good as far as readibilty and such goes. the stuff that shipped with Mandrake 8.0 is old-hat now. things got better.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by rjb263 on 10/31/01 04:31 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.