Hi Folks
Just having a discussion at work and am hoping you guys can provide some input.
We have a client that needs a new switch, they had 2 Allied Telesyn 24x 10/100Mbps with crossover linking port 1 of switch 1 to port 1 of switch 2 (what I mean is they had nothing fancy, no EtherChannel or STP etc).
One of those switches has failed entirely.
We've been quoted about $350 for a 10/100 Mbps 24 port switch with 4x 1GB ports or about $550 for a 24x 10/100/1000 24 port, both would suit our requirements from a configuration point of view.
With regard to speed which would we be best to go with?
A 24 port 10/100/1000 where all computers would have equal access to the network.
Or a 24 port 10/100 + 4 1GB with the main server connected to one of the 1GB ports.
Personally I'd prefer the 10/100/1000 24 port, but a colleague pointed out that the server could be bombarded with requests from it's client PC's as there is quite a bit of file sharing done at this site to and from the server.
Which would you guys go with?
Go with the 10/100/1000 as it makes no difference for the server. If there are several client PCs making requests at the same time, you could implement teaming on the server to improve network performance. I presume that you have a real server with 2 NICs, fast hard disks and a RAID controller.
Go with the 10/100/1000 as most, if not all, computers are coming with G-Bit as the standard. This will increase the speed on your network especially since you mention there is quite a bit of file sharing. As for your colleague tell him that a 10/100 would be more of a bottle neck then Gbit.
Do what GhislainG said and team the nics together to increase throughput to the switch.
------------------------------I ain't signing nothin
Reply to sturm
Because of file sharing, the 10/100/1000 would certainly be better. However, will the 2nd old switch still be used? If so, how often do PC on that switch will communicate with systems on the new one? Remember that this link will still be limited to the 100Mbps link of the old switch and could cause a severe bottleneck (but no more than it used to I guess).