Been having a hard time finding comparisons in performance between these two CPUs. I'm debating between two laptops where this is the only difference, but the price difference is $200? Is it worth it? I do very CPU intensive gaming (i.e. not GPU bottlenecked, CPU bottlenecked.. strategy, RTS, and the like).
P is lower power, T is regular, T is available in higher speeds than P usually
P is more expensive but it saves power.
T usually have a FSB of 800 and P has 1033 (usually, there are lots of Ts out there with better faster FSB, but since the P comes out after, they are ALL 1033 or faster FSB)
for you, if you don't mind the lack of battery then the T would work for you.
And usually you cannot OC laptops, so umm, that I think have little effect on you.
Power usage / battery life is not too much of a concern in my particular situation, I'm mostly looking for performance. I notice the first laptop above (the T9600) has a higher clock speed. Is this the better-performing CPU as far as raw power?
I found a Toshiba Satellite with a difference of $100 in a laptop configuration between P8700 and T9600. Does anyone think this price differential is small enough to justify moving up to the added 3MB cache and 266Mhz improvement of the T9600?
This same machine I mentioned has a 12 cell battery which I thought was important, too. The 4650 with 1GB VRAM feels like it'll be enough for whatever I want to play without killing the battery or running too hot.
What I would love is a P96xx or greater processor with the 25W spec. I'd put the money down if I saw that one.