I am currently learning that my software raid 0 is not big on safety if a drive dies or some hardware dies.
So I am looking at a setting up a new raid. I am not sure what to go for here. Software or hardware raid?
I use this mobo the Asus P5N-E
What are the pros and cons of hardware raid vs software raid for this mobo and onboard controllers?
What would give me the best choice of redundancy and performance, hardware or software raid?
I am thinking about using raid level 0+1. As it seems to give me the speed of raid 0 and the redundancy of raid 5. As I understand things if 1 drive fails the raid setup will degrade from raid 0+1 into raid 0 until new HDD is added.
Does Linux support software raid 0+1 or do I need to go for BSD?
Will either sw or hw raid give me the option to move raid to new pc with data intact of something like mobo fails?
On widipedia I found this information, unfortunatly the info is not very specific.
So what to choose, Hw or sw raid for my motoherboard? I am looking for maximum speed and redundancy. What will be fastest for me?
Does Linux support software raid 0+1 or do I need to go for BSD?
Will either sw or hw raid give me the option to move raid to new pc with data intact of something like mobo fails?
So I am looking at a setting up a new raid. I am not sure what to go for here. Software or hardware raid?
I use this mobo the Asus P5N-E
What are the pros and cons of hardware raid vs software raid for this mobo and onboard controllers?
What would give me the best choice of redundancy and performance, hardware or software raid?
I am thinking about using raid level 0+1. As it seems to give me the speed of raid 0 and the redundancy of raid 5. As I understand things if 1 drive fails the raid setup will degrade from raid 0+1 into raid 0 until new HDD is added.
Does Linux support software raid 0+1 or do I need to go for BSD?
Will either sw or hw raid give me the option to move raid to new pc with data intact of something like mobo fails?
On widipedia I found this information, unfortunatly the info is not very specific.
Software RAID has advantages and disadvantages compared to hardware RAID. The software must run on a host server attached to storage, and server's processor must dedicate processing time to run the RAID software. The additional processing capacity required for RAID 0 and RAID 1 is low, but parity-based arrays require more complex data processing during write or integrity-checking operations. As the rate of data processing increases with the number of disks in the array, so does the processing requirement. Furthermore all the buses between the processor and the disk controller must carry the extra data required by RAID which may cause congestion.
Hardware RAID controllers use different, proprietary disk layouts, so it is not usually possible to span controllers from different manufacturers. They do not require processor resources, the BIOS can boot from them, and tighter integration with the device driver may offer better error handling.
A hardware implementation of RAID requires at least a special-purpose RAID controller. On a desktop system this may be a PCI expansion card, PCI-e expansion card or built into the motherboard. Controllers supporting most types of drive may be used – IDE/ATA, SATA, SCSI, SSA, Fibre Channel, sometimes even a combination. The controller and disks may be in a stand-alone disk enclosure, rather than inside a computer. The enclosure may be directly attached to a computer, or connected via SAN. The controller hardware handles the management of the drives, and performs any parity calculations required by the chosen RAID level.
Most hardware implementations provide a read/write cache, which, depending on the I/O workload, will improve performance. In most systems the write cache is non-volatile (i.e. battery-protected), so pending writes are not lost on a power failure.
Hardware implementations provide guaranteed performance, add no overhead to the local CPU complex and can support many operating systems, as the controller simply presents a logical disk to the operating system.
Hardware implementations also typically support hot swapping, allowing failed drives to be replaced while the system is running.
However, inexpensive hardware RAID controllers can be slower than software RAID due to the dedicated CPU on the controller card not being as fast as the CPU in the computer/server. More expensive RAID controllers have faster CPUs, capable of higher throughput speeds and do not present this slowness.
So what to choose, Hw or sw raid for my motoherboard? I am looking for maximum speed and redundancy. What will be fastest for me?
Does Linux support software raid 0+1 or do I need to go for BSD?
Will either sw or hw raid give me the option to move raid to new pc with data intact of something like mobo fails?