SYSTEM USAGE FROM MOST TO LEAST IMPORTANT: gaming, movies, internet, home work
PARTS NOT REQUIRED: Keyboard, Mouse
PREFERRED WEBSITE(S) FOR PARTS: Newegg, cheapest
PARTS PREFERENCES: Too new to be picky about this stuff
OVERCLOCKING: Maybe
SLI OR CROSSFIRE: Prob not
MONITOR RESOLUTION: all of the above
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
This is my first build. I am very new with everything. Ive done research to figure out stuff on my own but can only go so far. THANKs FOR YOUR HELP.
Also, Im just trying to build this comp up for gaming and movies.
Now, heres a big question. My first choice for the cpu is the 3.2 X4 core below. Although, for sake of saving money(kinda important) I was wondering how much of a difference would I notice if I used a 2.8 X3 core, below, instead of the quad. Is it worth the extra 100 dollars? Or will i not notice and should go with the X3?
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Deneb 3.2GHz 4 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Quad-Core Processor - Retail
If its in your budget then the 955 is a stronger cpu ,
but the 720 be is not going to be a disadvantage in games with that video card and monitor resolution .
I would buy the 720 be and if the extra money was available I'd get a 22inch 1680 x 1050 monitor instead . You might have to turn some detail settings down on some games but its probably worth it to play with the bigger monitor
Why don't you just read some reviews and let the charts speak for themselves? If you'll see a difference or not depends on your intended use. I think it'd be hard to tell the difference in the tasks you mentioned in your OP. You'll see a definite improvement in video editing and other tasks that will use all four threads, but you won't notice much of a difference in most games.
In games, you will not notice a difference unless you play FSX. You would notice the difference in Video editing and 3D rendering, and things like photoshop or CAD. If none of those things fit the description of what you like to do, then the X3 sounds like the better option...for now. In a year or two though its possible that games will be able to use 4 cores, and you may wish you had a quad.
I personally think that the 955 is a waste of money. Why? because its basically the same thing as the 940, which is $60 cheaper. It has 200mhz faster clock, and it achieves that by having a faster bus speed. However to get that higher stock bus speed, it must also have a higher stock voltage. That means that the silicon in the 955 is no better than the silicon in the 940, if it were, you wouldn't need to increase the voltage. If you will not overclock, then there might be a reason to go for the 955, but honestly its not worth 30% price increase for a 7% speed increase. If you are going to overclock, then I see no good reason to get the 955, since they will both overclock to the same speeds. DDR3 memory doesn't really make a difference in any benchmarks except for 3Dmark. So I would shoot the middle of those two processors you are considering and get the 940 with DDR2 memory on the AM2+ socket.
IMO the PII 940 is the best value in a quad core processor anywhere.
Message edited by xthekidx on 05-14-2009 at 11:23:44 PM
------------------------------Asus P6T & i7 920 @ 3.6ghz
GTX 260 Core 216
6gb 1443MHZ 7-7-7-18 1T OCZ Platinum
CM RC-690, CM V8 HSF
Reply to xthekidx
So, if I go with the X3, what would I notice in difference from the X4?
Examples, so i can weigh it out better?
I think there wont be a difference in gaming since the limitation of your system will be the gfx card and not the processor
Elsewhere the 955 will pull ahead . Having said that I personally dont care if an encoding job takes 10 minutes or 9 minutes . Either way I wont be sitting there watching happen . I'd be getting a coffee or making a phone call etc
You have to decide what is the right balance for you
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.