I understood that the nvidia quadro FX 1700 is the one to aim for
for video editing . This card is out of my leage and I am also not shure
I need it in a ~ $1200 system for family movies editing and some
pictures [ no game playing].
The step down card is the new 580 Does anybody tried it out
or the previus 570 ?
Should I go for that or for something like a 9800 card ???
I understood that the nvidia quadro FX 1700 is the one to aim for for video editing . This card is out of my leage and I am also not shure I need it in a ~ $1200 system for family movies editing and some pictures [ no game playing]. The step down card is the new 580 Does anybody tried it out or the previus 570 ? Should I go for that or for something like a 9800 card ???
Video editing is both GPU and CPU intensive. Don't skimp too much on either one. If you can afford it step up to a GTX260 or 275 and as for the CPU look for AMD Phenom II X4 quad or an Intel Core 2 Quad as an i7 system may be out of the $1200 price range.
Gl and let us know what you end up with.
Irish
Message edited by Irish on 06-09-2009 at 03:03:50 PM
I depends on who you talk to. My line of thinking is If I can get a card for about 150 to do what I need it to then that is perfect. You could prob get away with an 8800 but if you keep computers for a long time then it may be out dated sooner rather than later.
From what I remember is that the Fx cards are coded differently for workstation applications and Multiple monitor use, more than 3 on 1 card kind of thing, where as the the consumer version is more suited toward today's applications, and games. I video edit off of a GTS 250 and before that it was a 7800 gtx, I also game a edit photos. You don't have to go hog wild with the GPU just don't skimp either.
IMO i would go with a non-workstation card unless that's what your building.