Word :    Username :           
 

Which would u choose 8800 or 9600? and why?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

1100 or 1000 depending on mood/sunshine.

Reply to mousemonkey

Almost any of the 8800 series cards will be more powerful than a 9600 series, but it will draws more power.
Perhaps you should post more details like which 8800/9600 series cards you are looking at, what your system has in it (including the PSU), your gaming resolution and your local prices?

 

Posting for Newcomers


Message edited by outlw6669 on 06-10-2009 at 10:13:24 PM
Reply to outlw6669

I assume he means 8800gt vs 9600gt and at lower resolutions the difference isn't noticable. Once you get to higher resolutions and aa/af the 8800gt has a clear advantage, additionally the 8800gt can overclock far more.
Just for note, the 9800gt is the same as the 8800gt but with a few energy saving features.

Reply to spanner_razor

I join the vote for the 8800/9800 GT. It's a known fact. Better than both is the Radeon 4850 which can be found as low as $80 after MIR now..Except it does not support cuda (physix in games for example), but a 8800 GT will struggle when it's enabled in most games to be honest.

Reply to avatar_raq
- 0 +

Kind of curious kind of a what if question. How do the two cores G92/G94 stack up when all things are completely equal? Hypothethically speaking, if the 9600 GT had 112 SP's as the 8800 with same clock speeds would there be any difference?

Reply to sdf

I thought it was something to do with motorcycles.

Reply to mousemonkey

I'd get the Kawasaki or Yamaha.

Reply to HundredIslandsBoy

My Kawasaki is in bits and my Yamaha has a flat rear tyre the BMW has no tax so I'm going on the Honda today. :)

Reply to mousemonkey

Guys, seriously...

The weakest 8800, the 8800GT, is the exact same card as the 9800GT, which is obviously more powerful then the 9600GT. As such, any 8800 card (GT, GTX, or Ultra) will beat the 9600GT, and by a significant margin.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/622598.png
Reply to gamerk316
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

Guys, seriously...

The weakest 8800, the 8800GT, is the exact same card as the 9800GT, which is obviously more powerful then the 9600GT. As such, any 8800 card (GT, GTX, or Ultra) will beat the 9600GT, and by a significant margin.


Don't forget the 8800GS. There are some exceptions, but in general 9800GT/8800GT > 9600GT > 9600GSO/8800GS.

Reply to pauldh

Dang, forgot about the GS; thanks for the reminder :D

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/622598.png
Reply to gamerk316

Man, I have no idea why people claim the naming structure of modern cards is confusing.....

:|

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685

my vote for 8800GT.

Reply to shubham1401

daedalus685 wrote :

Man, I have no idea why people claim the naming structure of modern cards is confusing.....

:|



Its not really the stucture, I just forgot that particular card:

NVIDIA NAMING SCHEME:

GS -> GSO -> GT -> GTX -> Ultra

x950 GX2 - Dual GPU (7950 GX2, 295 (9800 GX2 ignores this rule))
x800 - High end (6800, 8800, etc)
x600 - Medium end/budget (8600, 9600)
x500 - low end budget (9500)
x400 - non gaming (8400, 9400)
x200 - integrated?
Note: Drop last zero for 200 series and above

anything in between would qualify as a revision/die shrink (275 fits between 260 and 280; 285 is die shrink of 280)

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/622598.png
Reply to gamerk316

Its the letter suffixes that i find silly. Though I do understand how it works, no need to link it all. I could just look it up if I wasnt sure anyway...

------------------------------ CPU: Q9550 at 3.6ghz (FSB 425mhz) | MB: P5E3 Premium | Ram: 4*2Gb Corsair DDR3 @1417mhz | GPU: 2 HD4890 1Gb (925core/1025mem) CF | PSU: OCZ ELiteXtreme 800W | Sound: Creative Titanium Fatal1ty Pro | 2*120gb OCZ Vertex SSD Raid0 and 2 500gb Raid0 HDDS
Reply to daedalus685
- 0 +

gamerk316 wrote :

Its not really the stucture, I just forgot that particular card:

NVIDIA NAMING SCHEME:

GS -> GSO -> GT -> GTX -> Ultra

x950 GX2 - Dual GPU (7950 GX2, 295 (9800 GX2 ignores this rule))
x800 - High end (6800, 8800, etc)
x600 - Medium end/budget (8600, 9600)
x500 - low end budget (9500)
x400 - non gaming (8400, 9400)
x200 - integrated?
Note: Drop last zero for 200 series and above

anything in between would qualify as a revision/die shrink (275 fits between 260 and 280; 285 is die shrink of 280)



But you also should mention that the 8800GT and 9800GT are the same card, and the 8800GTX and 9800GTX are the same, and 9800GTX+ and GTS250 are the same, am I missing any? which adds to the confusion

Reply to ausch30
- 0 +

8800GS = 9600GSO (the 384Mb ones). And the 9500GT is the 8600GT.

But the 8800GTX and 9800GTX are different, the 9800GTX is the 8800GTS (512Mb) with higher clocks.

Reply to Dekasav
- 0 +

HundredIslandsBoy wrote :

I would choose the GTS 250.



You do realize that the GTS 250 performs the same as the 4850 and costs $30-$40 more, good choice. :sarcastic:


Message edited by ausch30 on 06-12-2009 at 12:31:52 AM
Reply to ausch30

But it's worth it for the better driver support. :lol:

Reply to mousemonkey
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 8800 vs 9600
Go to:

There are 1237 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them