TL;DR VERSION:
1. I am looking to build my first homebuild. I'm hoping for a gaming PC that will serve me adequately for ~4 years on a budget of ~$1600 to spend on components give or take. No need for a display. Planning on running Windows 7 RC until release.
2. Should I spend the whole budget up front or save a portion for upgrades at year 2? If saving a portion, what fraction should I save?
3. Is building an I7 system a reasonable choice if I am planning to upgrade? I don't want to get stuck having to replace the mobo after year two if I want to upgrade something other than the GPU.
4. Should I risk overclocking or not? The extra performance would be great but I'd rather not damage my components or end up with an unstable system.
5. Need help evaluating cases and motherboards especially, but possibly cooling and power supply as well (especially if OCing).
6. Is running a small performance HDD and a larger, slower HDD warranted at this price point? If so, should I go as high as a raptor or solid state drive for the performance HDD?
Hi all -- I've been planning on doing my first homebuild this summer for a while now, and it's time to start making concrete choices.
I'm aiming to build a gaming PC that will last for about four years on a general budget. There are two basic approaches to take here: I can spend only a portion of the budget up front and save some for upgrades around year 2-2.5 or I can spend most or all of the budget up front leaving room for little to no upgrading.
Given the way that the price to performance curve tends to work, I'm thinking that the former scenario is probably the better choice.
I'm not looking to play ultra graphics intensive games on tip-top settings, but I would like to be able to play current mmo/fps/rts/rpg titles with acceptable performance levels throughout the life of the system.
The way I see it, the two options are probably going to look like this based on my own past experiences with buying prebuilt PCs with the full budget upfront:
More upfront w/ no upgrade:
Year 1: Great performance | Year 2: Good/Great | Year 3: Adequate | Year 4: Poor
I'm pretty confident that will be accurate.
Less upfront w/ upgrade after year 2 (hopefully):
Year 1: Good performance | Year 2: Good/Adequate | Year 3: Good/Adequate | Year 4: Adequate
For me, Great is only a little better than good. Good is better than Adequate. Adequate is far better than poor.
So, if you all think my logic here is sound, it seems like I'd get a lot more benefit out of the "less upfront with upgrade" plan.
My overall budget is something in the range of ~$1600 give or take. It's not completely rigid, but I'd rather not go over that unless I'm getting some serious efficiency out of it. I'm currently happy with my Samsung SyncMaster 204bw, so I won't need a new display. My speakers are also fine. I won't need to spend yet on any software either as I'm planning on running the Windows 7 release candidate for the next year or so, as I have heard good things about that and pretty universally bad things about Vista (currently still running XP pro). Now, I'm not sure what ratio to spend now vs. save for upgrades.
Also, I was really hoping to use the system builder marathon as a template to work from, but who knows when the next of those will happen.
______________________________________
OK, so if I pick that plan then I need to plan around my upgrades now. GPU and RAM upgrades are easy. CPU upgrades are a bit more challenging but not bad assuming you don't have to replace the motherboard. If you do have to replace the motherboard, then suddenly you are getting into replacing at least two major components and possibly the RAM as well.
So that means I'd probably want to choose a chipset and motherboard combo now that will likely allow me to upgrade the CPU reasonably in two years without replacing the mobo and ram.
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that the best option that fits this description would be to go for a low end i7 as the technology is fairly new and I imagine there will be a fair amount of life in the mobo. Again, I could be wrong about that and would love to hear it if I am.
_______________________________________
When it comes to picking the rest of the components I have varying levels of expertise. I'm pretty comfortable selecting RAM and GPUs. Haven't really looked into the former yet in detail, but as far as the latter goes crossfire 4770s seems like a very powerful option at a decent price point. Of course, I may be able to afford to go a bit better depending on how much the rest of the components are going to cost me.
I have very little clue as to how to evaluate mobos in particular, so I could definitely use some advice on that front. Same with cases. I don't care much about aesthetics -- I just want a reliable case that works well for my purposes at as efficient a price as possible.
Optical drives aren't a problem.
As far as HDDs are concerned, I don't need a ton of space but performance is a potential issue as some of the games I play put a lot of strain on the HDD. I'm considering running 2 drives, one smaller performance drive and one slower but larger drive for storage. I'm not sure if it's worth going for something as high end as a raptor or (gasp) a solid state drive.
I'll probably go with air cooling, and I imagine that the same heatsinks that were good in January are still good now. My impression is that the technology doesn't change quite as quickly there.
Lastly we have the power supply, which I can't really select accurately until I have the rest of the build set as I'm not sure what my actual power needs will be. I imagine I'll want to get something bigger than I actually need just in case future upgrades require more power.
___________________________________________________________
Lastly, there is the question of overclocking. I've never done it before, but I hear it's easier now than ever. I don't want to risk ruining my components for a marginal gain though.
I imagine this will affect a number of my other decisions, particularly my choice of case, power supply, and cooling.
Anyway, I could use a lot of advice and thanks all for taking the time to read this!
1. I am looking to build my first homebuild. I'm hoping for a gaming PC that will serve me adequately for ~4 years on a budget of ~$1600 to spend on components give or take. No need for a display. Planning on running Windows 7 RC until release.
2. Should I spend the whole budget up front or save a portion for upgrades at year 2? If saving a portion, what fraction should I save?
3. Is building an I7 system a reasonable choice if I am planning to upgrade? I don't want to get stuck having to replace the mobo after year two if I want to upgrade something other than the GPU.
4. Should I risk overclocking or not? The extra performance would be great but I'd rather not damage my components or end up with an unstable system.
5. Need help evaluating cases and motherboards especially, but possibly cooling and power supply as well (especially if OCing).
6. Is running a small performance HDD and a larger, slower HDD warranted at this price point? If so, should I go as high as a raptor or solid state drive for the performance HDD?
Hi all -- I've been planning on doing my first homebuild this summer for a while now, and it's time to start making concrete choices.
I'm aiming to build a gaming PC that will last for about four years on a general budget. There are two basic approaches to take here: I can spend only a portion of the budget up front and save some for upgrades around year 2-2.5 or I can spend most or all of the budget up front leaving room for little to no upgrading.
Given the way that the price to performance curve tends to work, I'm thinking that the former scenario is probably the better choice.
I'm not looking to play ultra graphics intensive games on tip-top settings, but I would like to be able to play current mmo/fps/rts/rpg titles with acceptable performance levels throughout the life of the system.
The way I see it, the two options are probably going to look like this based on my own past experiences with buying prebuilt PCs with the full budget upfront:
More upfront w/ no upgrade:
Year 1: Great performance | Year 2: Good/Great | Year 3: Adequate | Year 4: Poor
I'm pretty confident that will be accurate.
Less upfront w/ upgrade after year 2 (hopefully):
Year 1: Good performance | Year 2: Good/Adequate | Year 3: Good/Adequate | Year 4: Adequate
For me, Great is only a little better than good. Good is better than Adequate. Adequate is far better than poor.
So, if you all think my logic here is sound, it seems like I'd get a lot more benefit out of the "less upfront with upgrade" plan.
My overall budget is something in the range of ~$1600 give or take. It's not completely rigid, but I'd rather not go over that unless I'm getting some serious efficiency out of it. I'm currently happy with my Samsung SyncMaster 204bw, so I won't need a new display. My speakers are also fine. I won't need to spend yet on any software either as I'm planning on running the Windows 7 release candidate for the next year or so, as I have heard good things about that and pretty universally bad things about Vista (currently still running XP pro). Now, I'm not sure what ratio to spend now vs. save for upgrades.
Also, I was really hoping to use the system builder marathon as a template to work from, but who knows when the next of those will happen.
______________________________________
OK, so if I pick that plan then I need to plan around my upgrades now. GPU and RAM upgrades are easy. CPU upgrades are a bit more challenging but not bad assuming you don't have to replace the motherboard. If you do have to replace the motherboard, then suddenly you are getting into replacing at least two major components and possibly the RAM as well.
So that means I'd probably want to choose a chipset and motherboard combo now that will likely allow me to upgrade the CPU reasonably in two years without replacing the mobo and ram.
I'm no expert, but it seems to me that the best option that fits this description would be to go for a low end i7 as the technology is fairly new and I imagine there will be a fair amount of life in the mobo. Again, I could be wrong about that and would love to hear it if I am.
_______________________________________
When it comes to picking the rest of the components I have varying levels of expertise. I'm pretty comfortable selecting RAM and GPUs. Haven't really looked into the former yet in detail, but as far as the latter goes crossfire 4770s seems like a very powerful option at a decent price point. Of course, I may be able to afford to go a bit better depending on how much the rest of the components are going to cost me.
I have very little clue as to how to evaluate mobos in particular, so I could definitely use some advice on that front. Same with cases. I don't care much about aesthetics -- I just want a reliable case that works well for my purposes at as efficient a price as possible.
Optical drives aren't a problem.
As far as HDDs are concerned, I don't need a ton of space but performance is a potential issue as some of the games I play put a lot of strain on the HDD. I'm considering running 2 drives, one smaller performance drive and one slower but larger drive for storage. I'm not sure if it's worth going for something as high end as a raptor or (gasp) a solid state drive.
I'll probably go with air cooling, and I imagine that the same heatsinks that were good in January are still good now. My impression is that the technology doesn't change quite as quickly there.
Lastly we have the power supply, which I can't really select accurately until I have the rest of the build set as I'm not sure what my actual power needs will be. I imagine I'll want to get something bigger than I actually need just in case future upgrades require more power.
___________________________________________________________
Lastly, there is the question of overclocking. I've never done it before, but I hear it's easier now than ever. I don't want to risk ruining my components for a marginal gain though.
I imagine this will affect a number of my other decisions, particularly my choice of case, power supply, and cooling.
Anyway, I could use a lot of advice and thanks all for taking the time to read this!